1 Leadership Responsibility Test
-
Originally posted by maurizio13:
If I start similar thread later thread gets ban, because it's the same leadership responsibility test.
That reply of his already shows little he knows about how this forum functions
-
I believe all travelling vessel has AT LEAST 1 safety precaution.
-
Originally posted by Spartans:
As I mentioned in another thread, I dun think DeerHunter = Gazelle.
Gazelle is incapable of writing such English standard. His English standard is simply pathetic.
He is capable of differentiating his style slightly, but fundamental MO cannot be changed.Even lionnoisy's standard of English in his post has improved within these few months, perhaps the MIW has budgeted some funds to enable him to take some English courses to improve his English.
-
Originally posted by maurizio13:
He is capable of differentiating his style slightly, but fundamental MO cannot be changed.
Is it? I tot Gazelle is nothing but a retarded moron with limited English proficiency who only hobby is panty sniffing.haha...
-
Originally posted by poker69:
Weird ley, why the captian cannot control his crew?TS is already wrong, because this is hardly a test of leadership. It is more of a case of moral judgement. However, this is a badly designed question. This is because no matter you choose the utilitarian approach or the deontological approach, both seems to point at A.
A harder one would be... Supposed a fat man is standing beside you on a bridge. You see a train which lost control and chiong-ing down the tracks. In addition, some madman has tied 5 people to the tracks. You know that if you push this fat man down, you will be able to stop the train and hence save the 5 people. However, the fat man will die. Yet, if you don't push the fat man down, 5 lives would be lost instead.
In the above scenario, which one would you choose?
-
Originally posted by Spartans:
Is it? I tot Gazelle is nothing but a retarded moron with limited English proficiency who only hobby is panty sniffing.haha...
He is.These days he keeps registering news nicks to avoid detection, but we can smell his odour the moment he comes in.
Maybe MIW propaganda department required him to take a course in soft skills propaganda.
-
Let's give him the benifit of doubt LOL
-
Originally posted by Midlusionz:
Let's give him the benifit of doubt LOL
Ya. Cos I still think DeerHunter is not Gazelle.At least he is more fluent and coherent in his argument whereas Gazelle only know how to insult others.
-
Originally posted by Spartans:
Ya. Cos I still think DeerHunter is not Gazelle.At least he is more fluent and coherent in his argument whereas Gazelle only know how to insult others.
U will be amazed how humans can evolve and change into another one within days, months or years but still let's continue this so called leadership test ya.
-
Originally posted by Spartans:
Ya. Cos I still think DeerHunter is not Gazelle.At least he is more fluent and coherent in his argument whereas Gazelle only know how to insult others.
If you say so, but I am telling you DeerHunter is 99.99% Gazelle.Gazelle is also capable of fluency if and when he chooses.
-
Originally posted by maurizio13:
If you say so, but I am telling you DeerHunter is 99.99% Gazelle.Gazelle is also capable of fluency if and when he chooses.
Gazelle and Deer is somewhat related in terms of animal facts..
-
Originally posted by maurizio13:
Leadership responsibility test 2:
If you are the captain of a ship, you as the captain make $3.7 millions, while your lieutenants make $2.5 millions and your deck hands (sailors) make $20,000.
When the price of living goes up, your sailors are not making enough to provide basic necessities for their elderly parents, wife and children.
Will you as a leader:
1) Ask the ship owner to reduce the salary of the captain and lieutenants, distribute the excess of these salaries to help your ship crew.
or
2) Greedily keep all the money for yourself at the same time asking the ship owner for more salary because you get more from selling backside at the docks. Since you are no longer selling backside at the docks, you demand the same payment as you would get from selling backside.
What kind of moral leader do you think we have? (1) or (2)
There is no right or wrong answer, it's only a question of morality.
If I am the captain, I will donate some of the ship's profit to the sailors so he can afford his families expense and won't think about going to work for another ship.
-
Summon Captain Planet to put out the fire.
-
I wouldn't seal the door because I believe any fire wouldn't spread so fast unless there are flammable materials in the engine room. But who would put flammable materials in the engine room. It's a matter of time the 15 ran out unless they were planning for a fire tolerance test.
Regards
-
LOL..
If only we can judge a person's morality by answering A or B.
In a real life situation. Neither A NOR B will apply.
If the captain choose A OR B , he is a very stupid captain.
It will be immoral to have such a captain run ANY ship with humans on it.
-
Originally posted by eagle:
TS is already wrong, because this is hardly a test of leadership. It is more of a case of moral judgement. However, this is a badly designed question. This is because no matter you choose the utilitarian approach or the deontological approach, both seems to point at A.
A harder one would be... Supposed a fat man is standing beside you on a bridge. You see a train which lost control and chiong-ing down the tracks. In addition, some madman has tied 5 people to the tracks. You know that if you push this fat man down, you will be able to stop the train and hence save the 5 people. However, the fat man will die. Yet, if you don't push the fat man down, 5 lives would be lost instead.
In the above scenario, which one would you choose?
Nice analysis...How come deerhunter always get so badly pwned in just about every thread one?
-
guys,
Please stop using fictional situations to teach youngsters here about morality.
Soon they will believe it is OK to kill someone to save what they value more.
IT IS WRONG to kill !!!!
Please use realistic situations with realistic choices.
There are emergency and safety protocols , so please.... use those instead !!!
Teach the proper way to handle emergency situations !!!
-
Originally posted by DeerHunter:
Had enough? I do know for sure you will NEVER make a leader in anycase with all that stupid responsibility shirking questions. How's your PMS? Seems like you have PMS daily. Do watch that anger, your spleen's about to burst. But no matter, as you live in a rubbish bin. I will just collect the bin and cremate it together with you inside. Makes my samaritan job easier.
Hahahaha - your Great Mentor Shepherd will give you a characteristic laughter laced with ridicule to your very decisive juvenile response compared to your indecisive expectation to your own test in idiotlogy.
Have you started a fire in your $27 garbage bin and decided to seal the only door - and now wish that you can "jump ship" since you have no crew with you ?
Can you even know what makes a leader - when you do not even know where to begin to get any "right or wrong answers" to your stupendous test question in pure idiotlogy ?
Have you decidedly retired into your garbage bin and produce some new wimpy collection from your garbage bin residence ?
How did you so brilliantly switch to a new topic concerning "issues from the female underworld" ?
With your sudden indulgence in a public display of your stupendous knowledge in all the characterisitcs of "daily PMS" - you seem to have the same skill set that only a Gazelle possess from his remarkable knowledge gathered from his "not-so-secret" indulgence in the "fine fabrics" belonging to his friend's sister..
On your favored PMS subject, I will defer to the decided expertise of a deerHunter's sniffing abilities that is similar to the Gazelle's expertise with his "panty sniffing" indulgence.
-
Originally posted by DeerHunter:
Had enough? I do know for sure you will NEVER make a leader in anycase with all that stupid responsibility shirking questions. How's your PMS? Seems like you have PMS daily. Do watch that anger, your spleen's about to burst. But no matter, as you live in a rubbish bin. I will just collect the bin and cremate it together with you inside. Makes my samaritan job easier.
Sigh... now he's acting like a small child after asking people to take a "leadership responsibility test"
-
It's a stupid test
-
Originally posted by Midlusionz:
It's a stupid test
X2
-
Originally posted by jojobeach:
guys,
Please stop using fictional situations to teach youngsters here about morality.
Soon they will believe it is OK to kill someone to save what they value more.
IT IS WRONG to kill !!!!
Please use realistic situations with realistic choices.
There are emergency and safety protocols , so please.... use those instead !!!
Teach the proper way to handle emergency situations !!!
this is what's wrong with the gahmen here in general, simulate without a dose of reality. therefore, application that is out of touch.
the TS is merely conforming to this line of thought. we need to be emphatic with this chap here.
-
Originally posted by jojobeach:
guys,
Please stop using fictional situations to teach youngsters here about morality.
Soon they will believe it is OK to kill someone to save what they value more.
IT IS WRONG to kill !!!!
Please use realistic situations with realistic choices.
There are emergency and safety protocols , so please.... use those instead !!!
Teach the proper way to handle emergency situations !!!
That's why I said...
Call Captain Planet!