Singapore petrol is still the cheapest in the world?
-
Originally posted by £ Ĭ €Ú°:
If I can show you the article, would you apologies to me and say you will never reply to any of our post and thread forever.
DEAL or NO DEAL?
You have yet to prove to me that you have not spouted rubbish as per the points above. That is the main subject of contention between us. Any reason why you consistently like to bring in unrelated context?
You give a satisfactory explanation why I should apologize for you to show the article when our discussion is about Luxembourg, in which I have already proven you to be rubbish and of no substance, then I deal with you.
-
Originally posted by eagle:
You have yet to prove to me that you have not spouted rubbish as per the points above. That is the main subject of contention between us. Any reason why you consistently like to bring in unrelated context?
You give a satisfactory explanation why I should apologize for you to show the article when our discussion is about Luxembourg, in which I have already proven you to be rubbish and of no substance, then I deal with you.
If I can show you the article, would you apologies to me and say you will never reply to any of my post and thread forever.DEAL or NO DEAL?
-
Originally posted by £ Ĭ €Ú°:
If I can show you the article, would you apologies to me and say you will never reply to any of my post and thread forever.DEAL or NO DEAL?
You have yet to prove to me that you have not spouted rubbish as per the points above. That is the main subject of contention between us. Any reason why you consistently like to bring in unrelated context?
You give a satisfactory explanation why I should apologize for you to show the article when our discussion is about Luxembourg, in which I have already proven you to be rubbish and of no substance, then I deal with you.
-
Originally posted by eagle:
You have yet to prove to me that you have not spouted rubbish as per the points above. That is the main subject of contention between us. Any reason why you consistently like to bring in unrelated context?
You give a satisfactory explanation why I should apologize for you to show the article when our discussion is about Luxembourg, in which I have already proven you to be rubbish and of no substance, then I deal with you.
Eagle, please dont try to make up fairytale just to tell the world that you have balls. If you have what it takes to bring me down with your stupid dumb ass luxembourg formula, do you think you can wait till now to bring this up??
The reason why NO ONE in this forum, I repeat, NO ONE, not even MAURIZIO, is interested to comment on your stupid little Luxumbourg conclusion is because it is CRAP, and within that CRAP there lies more crap, it contain stupid calculation error which took you 72 hours and countless attempt of self glorifying to release. The best part is that, the error is so basic and obvious that a primary 6 kid would have noticed it right away.
The is the exact words from you, not some cut and paste BS like you have created above to enlarge your fake manhood.
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Originally posted by maurizio13:
Please show us the link to prove.
I have nothing to hide, all excerpts from news article and government reports.
EAGLE : Seems like TS likes to spout rubbish
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
I am sorry, I cant be bother to put words in your mouth, I will put a ton of shit in your mouth for being a slimy little coward
Please stop acting like a spineless sissy coward lah..call yourself a scholar? Might as well cut off your manhood and become a x-dresser.
-
Maurizio, what is your views about Eagle's Luxembourg conclusion? I noticed that you have avoided commenting on it, I wonder why.
-
Originally posted by £ Ĭ €Ú°:
Eagle, please dont try to make up fairytale just to tell the world that you have balls. If you have what it takes to bring me down with your stupid dumb ass luxembourg formula, do you think you can wait till now to bring this up??
The reason why NO ONE in this forum, I repeat, NO ONE, not even MAURIZIO, is interested to comment on your stupid little Luxumbourg conclusion is because it is CRAP, and within that CRAP there lies more crap, it contain stupid calculation error which took you 72 hours and countless attempt of self glorifying to release. The best part is that, the error is so basic and obvious that a primary 6 kid would have noticed it right away.
The is the exact words from you, not some cut and paste BS like you have created above to enlarge your fake manhood.
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
EAGLE : Seems like TS likes to spout rubbish
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
I am sorry, I cant be bother to put words in your mouth, I will put a ton of shit in your mouth for being a slimy little coward
Please stop acting like a spineless sissy coward lah..call yourself a scholar? Might as well cut off your manhood and become a x-dresser.
So has anyone commented on M13's Taiwan's comparison?
You make totally no sense again, simply because you cannot even compare
-
Originally posted by £ Ĭ €Ú°:
Maurizio, what is your views about Eagle's Luxembourg conclusion? I noticed that you have avoided commenting on it, I wonder why.
Why should he comment on my discussion with you when I didn't comment on his Taiwan's discussion with you?
Seems like another senseless and childish post from you
-
Originally posted by eagle:
So has anyone commented on M13's Taiwan's comparison?
You make totally no sense again, simply because you cannot even compare
Why dont you be the first? Why scare Taiwan with turn into another Korea? -
to put the matter to rest, TS where's your korean article. You claimed that you have it. So where is it?
-
Originally posted by huzane89:
to put the matter to rest, TS where's your korean article. You claimed that you have it. So where is it?
May i know why you doubted me in the first place? -
Originally posted by £ Ĭ €Ú°:
May i know why you doubted me in the first place?
Its hard not to. You keep delaying for whatever reasons. You keep demanding apologies in exchange for viewing the article. It really look as it is very obvious that you dont have the article.If you really dont have it, I suggest you disappear from this forum for a few days and let the matter rest.
From you character, it seems that you are in upper primary or lower secondary. Honestly speaking. No negative intentions involved.
-
Originally posted by £ Ĭ €Ú°:
May i know why you doubted me in the first place?
May I know why not? -
Originally posted by £ Ĭ €Ú°:
Why dont you be the first? Why scare Taiwan with turn into another Korea?I see that this time you admitted your flawed comparison.
Nah, I'm not going to hijack his discussion. You think everyone else thinks like you?
Don't continue in your self denial.
And yeah, you still need to show us your korea article.
-
Originally posted by huzane89:
Its hard not to. You keep delaying for whatever reasons. You keep demanding apologies in exchange for viewing the article. It really look as it is very obvious that you dont have the article.If you really dont have it, I suggest you disappear from this forum for a few days and let the matter rest.
From you character, it seems that you are in upper primary or lower secondary. Honestly speaking. No negative intentions involved.
He's afraid of me exposing him wrong again and again.
-
Originally posted by eagle:
I see that this time you admitted your flawed comparison.
Nah, I'm not going to hijack his discussion. You think everyone else thinks like you?
Don't continue in your self denial.
And yeah, you still need to show us your korea article.
You will be the last on everyone's mind to come out with something that is worth reading. trust me, your luxembourg conclusion is crap!! dont believe go ask your professor in your Uni of Dung to comment on it.
-
Originally posted by eagle:
He's afraid of me exposing him wrong again and again.
I support yr view. Lets have a vote of who is the real spinless coward in this thread..Those signup on june 08 and after are not qualify to vote to prevent cheating.
£ Ĭ €Ú° is the real spineless coward.. So the dog +1
-
Originally posted by eagle:
He's afraid of me exposing him wrong again and again.
Please dont simply hijack other peoples discussion. That is both rude and childish. It only show that you are becoming more insecure about yourself and you are desperately looking for alliance. -
Originally posted by eagle:
He's afraid of me exposing him wrong again and again.
I support yr view. Lets have a vote of who is the real spinless coward in this thread..Those signup on june 08 and after are not qualify to vote to prevent cheating.
£ Ĭ €Ú° is the real spineless coward.. So the dog +1
-
Originally posted by zenden9:
I support yr view. Lets have a vote of who is the real spinless coward in this thread..Those signup on june 08 and after are not qualify to vote to prevent cheating.
£ Ĭ €Ú° is the real spineless coward.. So the dog +1
Eagle, you can talk to Zender as much as you want. this one I am OUT!! -
Originally posted by £ Ĭ €Ú°:
Please dont simply hijack other peoples discussion. That is both rude and childish. It only show that you are becoming more insecure about yourself and you are desperately looking for alliance.
I think u are more rude and childish.. Bad dog! -
Originally posted by £ Ĭ €ڰ:
Eagle, you can talk to Zender as much as you want. this one I am OUT!!
£ Ĭ €ڰ.... U no balls to take part in vote? Quickly apologise to other forumer since u admit defeat.. The poll still stand at 1-0.. -
Originally posted by £ Ĭ €Ú°:
Maurizio, what is your views about Eagle's Luxembourg conclusion? I noticed that you have avoided commenting on it, I wonder why.
I am sure there are merits for using petrol prices over GDP per Capita to make a comparison.It shows the percentage of the price of petrol as compared to their GDP per person. Although I think Singapore wages fails far from it's GDP per Capita, because the wages in Singapore aren't exactly fair by Gini Coefficient standards. Luxembourg Gini is only around 26.0, whereas Singapore is trending towards 50.0.
A low Gini like 26.0 shows that the income is more evenly distributed than a Gini of 50.0 by Singapore. Therefore Singapore's GDP per capita as received by the majority of citizens is definitely less than stated, therefore petrol prices divide by a smaller GDP per Capita will only result in a larger percentage of petrol prices.
-
Originally posted by maurizio13:
I am sure there are merits for using petrol prices over GDP per Capita to make a comparison.It shows the percentage of the price of petrol as compared to their GDP per person. Although I think Singapore wages fails far from it's GDP per Capita, because the wages in Singapore aren't exactly fair by Gini Coefficient standards. Luxembourg Gini is only around 26.0, whereas Singapore is trending towards 50.0.
A low Gini like 26.0 shows that the income is more evenly distributed than a Gini of 50.0 by Singapore. Therefore Singapore's GDP per capita as received by the majority of citizens is definitely less than stated, therefore petrol prices divide by a smaller GDP per Capita will only result in a larger percentage of petrol prices.
Maurizio, should we also include the income tax factor since in Singapore majority of us dont pay income tax?
-
Originally posted by £ Ĭ €Ú°:
Maurizio, should we also include the income tax factor since in Singapore majority of us dont pay income tax?
Don't think so, because the income tax in those countries goes into helping the less privileged of society unlike Singapore which goes into helping the Ministers. -
Originally posted by maurizio13:
Don't think so, because the income tax in those countries goes into helping the less privileged of society unlike Singapore which goes into helping the Ministers.
But I would presume that majority of the less privileged doesnt drive isnt it?