Singapore petrol is still the cheapest in the world?
-
Originally posted by huzane89:
i thought they are clones of each other?Doesn't matter if they are clones or no clones.
Both are just as under-developed.
-
Originally posted by jojobeach:
Doesn't matter if they are clones or no clones.
Both are just as under-developed.
they just dont have an appetite for liars -
Originally posted by jojobeach:
LIES and Deekhunter , two clowns talking to each other... hahah.. the circus has come to town.
Shut the hell up, american NoHole bitch!. Are you so lonely no americans want you that you must come here and talk your crap? Go and kiss your american butts and leave your stinking mouth there.
And eagle, you are the one who put words in the mouth of theirs. I had never claim the silent ones who are reading, watching and observing as agreeing or disagreeing with me, you dumbass!
-
Originally posted by £ Ĭ €Ú°:
Eagle, are you Gensis?Wow, people cannot accuse you, then you can accuse people?
Why don't you accuse me of being Maurizio as well?
Good job. Any more stupid comments we can expect from you?
-
Originally posted by DeerHunter:
Shut the hell up, american NoHole bitch!. Are you so lonely no americans want you that you must come here and talk your crap? Go and kiss your american butts and leave your stinking mouth there.
LOL... are you lonely too ? Your SG gf just dumped you for being under-developed , yes ?
-
Originally posted by eagle:
Wow, people cannot accuse you, then you can accuse people?
Why don't you accuse me of being Maurizio as well?
Good job. Any more stupid comments we can expect from you?
I am not accusing, i am politely asking if you are Gensis. And the answer I am expecting is a YES or NO.Why I dont accuse Maurizio? Ofcouse I have my reasons.
-
And eagle, you are the one who put words in the mouth of theirs. I had never claim the silent ones who are reading, watching and observing as agreeing or disagreeing with me, you dumbass!
Are you very very sure? Aren't you the one who said this
Do you think i care about what your gansters here say? Your numbers here and YOU mean nothing to me. It's those who are silent, reading and observing that means more. You are indeed a deluded fool not to realize that.
Yeah, the ones that commented about you in this forum doesn't matter even though the majority opinion is the same. To you, you would feel justified of your posts because "it's those who are silent, reading and observing that means more."
To you, the majority in forum does not matter even though this majority keep pointing out your mistakes; those who are silent, reading and observing matters simply because they did not point you to you your mistakes. You have a history of continuously justifying some of your rubbish by saying "it's those who are silent, reading and observing that means more", a clear indication of you putting your opinions into their mouths.
It's simple logic. If you think the silent readers disagreed with you, would you even have continued with your same posts and content that it is these silent readers who mean more when almost everyone else in this forum disagreed with you?
-
Originally posted by £ Ĭ €Ú°:
I am not accusing, i am politely asking if you are Gensis. And the answer I am expecting is a YES or NO.Why I dont accuse Maurizio? Ofcouse I have my reasons.
Simple answer for you, kid
No
-
Originally posted by eagle:
Simple answer for you, kid
No
Then could you do us a favour by inviting Gensis to meet me and Deerhunter in the shoutbox. And I would like you to talk to Deerhunter while I talk to Gensis. That way, we both can be sure that none of us are clones of one another.As for your claim that you could log on into Sgforums with 10 different nicks and talk in the shoutbox at the same time, may I suggest that you try first before telling us that you can do it. Having your nick appearing and chatting in shoutbox is a complete different thing.
-
Originally posted by £ Ĭ €Ú°:
Then could you do us a favour by inviting Gensis to meet me and Deerhunter in the shoutbox. And I would like you to talk to Deerhunter while I talk to Gensis. That way, we both can be sure that none of us are clones of one another.As for your claim that you could log on into Sgforums with 10 different nicks and talk in the shoutbox at the same time, may I suggest that you try first before telling us that you can do it. Having your nick appearing and chatting in shoutbox is a complete different thing.
I believe I'm already done with you on that, having already pointed out to you things you can try to prove it yourself, of which the most simple of all is to post in any IT forum around the world to confirm, something which you do not have the guts to do so. If you cannot accept hard facts, I don't see the need to drive it into your thick skull. Only a fool like you would prefer a harder and more time consuming way to get proof.
-
Originally posted by eagle:
Are you very very sure? Aren't you the one who said this
Yeah, the ones that commented about you in this forum doesn't matter even though the majority opinion is the same. To you, you would feel justified of your posts because "it's those who are silent, reading and observing that means more."
To you, the majority in forum does not matter even though this majority keep pointing out your mistakes; those who are silent, reading and observing matters simply because they did not point you to you your mistakes. You have a history of continuously justifying some of your rubbish by saying "it's those who are silent, reading and observing that means more", a clear indication of you putting your opinions into their mouths.
It's simple logic. If you think the silent readers disagreed with you, would you even have continued with your same posts and content that it is these silent readers who mean more when almost everyone else in this forum disagreed with you?
Dumbass, show me, show me, where i put words into others mouth? If you are stupid, don't attempt to fool others to believe your crap.
"it's those who are silent, reading and observing that means more" - simply means, for your dull witted stubborn brain, that their reactions, whether they agree or disagree with me - meant more. I am only excercising my freedom of expression of speech here, which you are determined to undermine. Whether others excercise theirs, i do not force them to, unlike you, who continually thinks that others who disagree with your idotic views have no right to disssent, but just simply because they disagree with you and you need to insult them and not use facts or reason. How about now a taste of your own medicine? -
And you call yourself a scholar? good grief! what scholarship did you get - crapology? Perhaps so, for you history of crap here, you indeed are a crapologist, academician of crap and even the sole holder of Phd in Crap perhaps?
-
Originally posted by DeerHunter:
Dumbass, show me, show me, where i put words into others mouth? If you are stupid, don't attempt to fool others to believe your crap.
"it's those who are silent, reading and observing that means more" - simply means, for your dull witted stubborn brain, that their reactions, whether they agree or disagree with me - meant more.
And you call yourself a scholar? good grief! what scholarship did you get - crapology? Perhaps so, for you history of crap here, you indeed are a crapologist, academician of crap and even the sole holder of Phd in Crap perhaps?
ya la ya la
I don't need to attempt to "fool" others at all.
Your main argument against majority consensus is usually "it's those who are silent, reading and observing that means more".
Perhaps you should really have a read in TS's thread 7 Signs That You're Living in Denial
The following really applies to you
Everyone Else is Wrong: Are all of the people who don't agree with you clueless? Are they that ignorant, can't they understand your brilliance? I'm sorry but, if that's the way you see things, I am afraid that the problem lies elsewhere. One tip: it's not with everyone else.
And
whether they agree or disagree with me - meant more.
you might as well tell me that whether the walls around you or the little ants around your table agree or disagree with you meant more. You know and ackowledged that they are silent readers, and yet you would still justify your posts by insulting every single forumer who disagreed with you, then tell everyone else that the silent readers meant more. Wow.
And you call yourself a scholar? good grief! what scholarship did you get - crapology? Perhaps so, for you history of crap here, you indeed are a crapologist, academician of crap and even the sole holder of Phd in Crap perhaps?
So having not even discussed with you much before, how would you know or not if I'm a scholar or not? Just because TS said so and you believe it? Or are you a clone that I have talked with beforehand?
-
Originally posted by eagle:
ya la ya la
I don't need to attempt to "fool" others at all.
Your main argument against majority consensus is usually "it's those who are silent, reading and observing that means more".
Perhaps you should really have a read in TS's thread 7 Signs That You're Living in Denial
The following really applies to you
And
you might as well tell me that whether the walls around you or the little ants around your table agree or disagree with you meant more. You know and ackowledged that they are silent readers, and yet you would still justify your posts by insulting every single forumer who disagreed with you, then tell everyone else that the silent readers meant more. Wow.
So having not even discussed with you much before, how would you know or not if I'm a scholar or not? Just because TS said so and you believe it? Or are you a clone that I have talked with beforehand?
Hey crapologist, running away from my post without answering any of it. You allege i insult every single forumer who disagreed with me. SHOW PROOF! SHOW PROOF NOW! Looks who is in denial! Lost your balls? If you can't show, then shut your slandering idiotic mouth, dumbass!
SHOW PROOF NOW! EVERY single one of them. SHOW PROOF NOW!
-
Originally posted by DeerHunter:
Hey crapologist, running away from my post without answering any of it. You allege i insult every single forumer who disagreed with me. SHOW PROOF! SHOW PROOF NOW! Looks who is in denial! Lost your balls? If you can't show, then shut your slandering idiotic mouth, dumbass!
SHOW PROOF NOW! EVERY single one of them. SHOW PROOF NOW!
Such a time consuming thing. Why don't you prove me wrong by finding one forumer who disagreed with you and that you did not insult before?
Show proof I'm wrong. SHOW PROOF NOW! Just one of them. SHOW PROOF NOW! And get the forumer to state too that you did not insult him before.
I will apologize for that statement, then change that sentence to you insulting most forumers who disagreed with you.
Talk about escaping questions when you are doing it yourself? Hypocrite again.
So having not even discussed with you much before, how would you know or not if I'm a scholar or not? Just because TS said so and you believe it? Or are you a clone that I have talked with beforehand?
-
Originally posted by DeerHunter:
Hey crapologist, running away from my post without answering any of it. You allege i insult every single forumer who disagreed with me. SHOW PROOF! SHOW PROOF NOW! Looks who is in denial! Lost your balls? If you can't show, then shut your slandering idiotic mouth, dumbass!
SHOW PROOF NOW! EVERY single one of them. SHOW PROOF NOW!
Not sure if you read the section where I was asking them if they agree with Maurizio13's $1.50 per L korean petrol. And Eagle is the first to chicken out when i ask him to comment. But then came 2 other forumers whom I cant remember their name, they agreed to disagee with Maurizio and then Eagle join in.
Isnt this a classic example of a balless chicken running around without a brain in his head? hhahaha.
Best part was, he was telling other forumers that he is a scholar.. :)
-
Originally posted by DeerHunter:
Hey crapologist, running away from my post without answering any of it. You allege i insult every single forumer who disagreed with me. SHOW PROOF! SHOW PROOF NOW! Looks who is in denial! Lost your balls? If you can't show, then shut your slandering idiotic mouth, dumbass!
SHOW PROOF NOW! EVERY single one of them. SHOW PROOF NOW!
Got leh.. you insult people who no agree with you leh.
I confirm , I witness.
-
Originally posted by jojobeach:
Got leh.. you insult people who no agree with you leh.
I confirm , I witness.
One more for you to witness
An idiotic childish forumer claiming others chicken out of his deal when others merely brush his childish antics aside
Any other term for it?
-
Originally posted by eagle:
Such a time consuming thing. Why don't you prove me wrong by finding one forumer who disagreed with you and that you did not insult before?
Show proof I'm wrong. SHOW PROOF NOW! Just one of them. SHOW PROOF NOW! And get the forumer to state too that you did not insult him before.
I will apologize for that statement, then change that sentence to you insulting most forumers who disagreed with you.
Talk about escaping questions when you are doing it yourself? Hypocrite again.
Will wonders never ceaze! The dumbass Phd Crap scholar APOLOGISES to me!
I will apologize for that statement - from eagle.
I will let you off, dumbass, make sure you be careful of your words. SDP may allow you and anyone else freedom to slander, but i sure as hell wont! And i am sure not many others will. As for the rest of your post, i won't bother. I didnt make the allegations, you did. I don't work for you, dumbass!
-
Originally posted by DeerHunter:
Will wonders never ceaze! The dumbass Phd Crap scholar APOLOGISES to me!
I will apologize for that statement - from eagle.
I will let you off, dumbass, make sure you be careful of your words. SDP may allow you and anyone else freedom to slander, but i sure as hell wont! And i am sure not many others will. As for the rest of your post, i won't bother. I didnt make the allegations, you did. I don't work for you, dumbass!
you can sue eagle if you want to meh? -
Originally posted by jojobeach:
Got leh.. you insult people who no agree with you leh.
I confirm , I witness.
Go sign a statutory declaration, American Nohole Bitch of the multiple private properties in US. Stay in the land of US and don't ever attempt to teach us citizens what to do. Even a sporean PR has more right to comment ( not vote ) about our country than you will ever do
-
Originally posted by DeerHunter:
Will wonders never ceaze! The dumbass Phd Crap scholar APOLOGISES to me!
I will apologize for that statement - from eagle.
I will let you off, dumbass, make sure you be careful of your words. SDP may allow you and anyone else freedom to slander, but i sure as hell wont! And i am sure not many others will. As for the rest of your post, i won't bother. I didnt make the allegations, you did. I don't work for you, dumbass!
Wonders? Can you explain what wonder there is? You still have not shown me proof of just one forumer who disagreed with you and you have not insulted before. I'm not letting you off on that.
And you are still evading my question. You mentioned a few times that I'm a scholar.
So having not even discussed with you much before, how would you know or not if I'm a scholar or not? Just because TS said so and you believe it? Or are you a clone that I have talked with beforehand?
I'm not letting you off on this at all. Where did you get any info that I have said I'm a scholar?
-
Originally posted by eagle:
Wonders? Can you explain what wonder there is? You still have not shown me proof of just one forumer who disagreed with you and you have not insulted before. I'm not letting you off on that.
And you are still evading my question. You mentioned a few times that I'm a scholar.
I'm not letting you off on this at all. Where did you get any info that I have said I'm a scholar?
i think is because TS keep saying you are a scholar and after a period of time, he came to believe you are a scholar.
-
Originally posted by huzane89:
you can sue eagle if you want to meh?Are you another nutcase wannabe? Sue over remarks here? Dumbass. Intelligence seems to be dropping low here with you guys around. No wonder the opposition political party seems to have run out of people to put in power, with the likes of you clowns here. You guys here are actually giving the opposition political party a bad name and reputation.
-
Originally posted by DeerHunter:
Are you another nutcase wannabe? Sue over remarks here? Dumbass. Intelligence seems to be dropping low here with you guys around. No wonder the opposition political party seems to have run out of people to put in power, with the likes of you clowns here. You guys here are actually giving the opposition political party a bad name and reputation.
Another example of someone who talked to you, and you insult immediately. So is this how the PAP functions?
-
Originally posted by eagle:
Wonders? Can you explain what wonder there is? You still have not shown me proof of just one forumer who disagreed with you and you have not insulted before. I'm not letting you off on that.
And you are still evading my question. You mentioned a few times that I'm a scholar.
I'm not letting you off on this at all. Where did you get any info that I have said I'm a scholar?
Lol! You think i care about what you do, dumbass? What you said or don't say is none of my business. You can rot in hell for all i care. But if you slander about our govt and society, I will give you hell, whether you are a scholar of crap or a nutcase.