Is Class 95 FM Too Much?
-
Originally posted by Dondontan:
?
-
come come...who wana fake peektures with me and we divide the money
-
Can't see the connection?
Flying Dutchman is the biggest PAP supporter i can think of on air. Notice how much he supports all government moves?
There was this morning, he was going on and on about how good ERP is and how it should have been implemented long ago.
I think their listernership is dropping. Ppl are now tuning in to internet radion like MSN radio etc. But to continue conning advertisers, they need more ppl to listen to their crap hence such cheap tactics.
-
Sigh... and I thought this would be a rather straightforward discussion on the ethics of what Class 95 is doing by conducting this 'contest'....
But somehow, you guys can somehow politicize everything and turn every damn discussion into a 'let's bash the gahmen!' thread.
Pfft. I'm outta here.
-
Originally posted by fudgester:
Sigh... and I thought this would be a rather straightforward discussion on the ethics of what Class 95 is doing by conducting this 'contest'....
But somehow, you guys can somehow politicize everything and turn every damn discussion into a 'let's bash the gahmen!' thread.
Pfft. I'm outta here.
thats wisdom for you, fudgie boy
-
TV version of STOMP~
-
btw.. are you really concerned or just plugging your blog?
also, this is something the people in SC haven't learnt yet.. if someone tells you to jump, do you really have to jump?
-
Class 95 want to be PAP state propaganda mouthpiece is one thing.
Target Singapore citizens with bullshit antics is another thing.
Don't be a fucker like Lee Kuan Yew class 95.
Fucking hell, all influenced by that bastard.
There was this morning, he was going on and on about how good ERP is and how it should have been implemented long ago.
FD can sing praises of Lee Kuan Yew, FD can defend Lee Kuan Yew, FD can go and repeat Lee Kuan YEw's propaganda, FD can go and suck Lee Kuan Yew's cock also okay, but please don't target Singaporeans.
Criticise Lee Kuan Yew don't dare, scared lose job, so praise him and target citizens.
What a fuck up situation.
FUCK YOU CLASS 95.
And you too MFB Lee Kuan Yew!
You happy lah Lee Kuan Yew, everyday got people sing your fucking praises on radio.
I also want someone to sing my fucking praises on Radio everyday.
DeerHunter, can you come to this forum and sing my fucking praises everyday?
Thanks.
-
Originally posted by Ferret:
thats wisdom for you, fudgie boy
If wisdom entails going off on long convoluted tangents to somehow drag the gahmen into the mess, then I feel really, really sad for the collective intelligence of this place.
Fair enough, what Class 95 is doing is highly unethical. So let this discussion be a debate on ethical standards in the mass media in general, and Class 95 in particular. Just keep the discussion straight and objective like the adults that we all are supposed to be.
Instead I see people in here going out on a limb and turning this thread into a bash-the-gahmen session. I may disagree with the government on a lot of things, but this is taking things way too far.
In fact, I don't even know what the heck I'm still doing in here.
Pfft. I'm better off elsewhere.
-
Originally posted by fudgester:
If wisdom entails going off on long convoluted tangents to somehow drag the gahmen into the mess, then I feel really, really sad for the collective intelligence of this place.
Fair enough, what Class 95 is doing is highly unethical. So let this discussion be a debate on ethical standards in the mass media in general, and Class 95 in particular. Just keep the discussion straight and objective like the adults that we all are supposed to be.
Instead I see people in here going out on a limb and turning this thread into a bash-the-gahmen session. I may disagree with the government on a lot of things, but this is taking things way too far.
In fact, I don't even know what the heck I'm still doing in here.
Pfft. I'm better off elsewhere.
thats wisdom for fantagf
-
Class 95fm does not care about its image to go ahead to invite public to send in such video. This may be to encourage more people to listen to their radio station. Recently, there have been more bad comments about the DJ fromt this station. Seem increasing resentment towards this particular DJ. The image is in crisis.
-
They should have one radio station that serves the state, sing praises of Lee Kuan Yew etc.
Other stations should be free and allowed to criticise.
Now all fucking state propaganda.
-
Originally posted by Poh Ah Pak:
They should have one radio station that serves the state, sing praises of Lee Kuan Yew etc.
Other stations should be free and allowed to criticise.
Now all fucking state propaganda.
dear sir,
I think most of us know your agenda from your first post, would you mind not repeating yourself,and worse, in such bad language?
I respect your views but if U feel so strongly about what you wrote, perhaps U can do it elsewhere where it is more suitable?
Thanks.
Moderators, please help.
-
Originally posted by iceFatboy:
dear sir,
I think most of us know your agenda from your first post, would you mind not repeating yourself,and worse, in such bad language?
I respect your views but if U feel so strongly about what you wrote, perhaps U can do it elsewhere where it is more suitable?
Thanks.
Moderators, please help.
How do you want the moderators to help? Sue Mr Poh for defamation? Time for you to slim down and knock some sense into your own head. -
Originally posted by Dondontan:
How do you want the moderators to help? Sue Mr Poh for defamation? Time for you to slim down and knock some sense into your own head.IFB is seeking for moderation. Not for legal assistance. And I dont see how that warrants a sarcastic remark from you.
-
STOMP is already bad enough.
Do we really need another 'moral police' in our society to watch over our every moves?
Taking people of others and putting in on the media for the whole world to criticize...I think that should be made illegal instead.
-
Originally posted by annoy-you-must:
STOMP is already bad enough.
Do we really need another 'moral police' in our society to watch over our every moves?
Taking people of others and putting in on the media for the whole world to criticize...I think that should be made illegal instead.
I support what you said. Recently, there is the antiStomp website.
-
Originally posted by annoy-you-must:
STOMP is already bad enough.
Do we really need another 'moral police' in our society to watch over our every moves?
Taking people of others and putting in on the media for the whole world to criticize...I think that should be made illegal instead.
Like that anyone everybody can be paparazi. -
I think they want it to be more of a deterrent to people who do ugly behaviour for the fear that people will start filming them.
-
Who the hell is class 95 to do that?
Moral police class 95?
Singapore already oppressive state already, they still want to make more bullshit.
Pui!
Fuck Off!
I film you FD and Glenn Ong, you happy or not?
Don't be bastard lah, go disturb people.
Go and fuck with Lee Kuan Yew lah.
-
Originally posted by jayh272416:
I think they want it to be more of a deterrent to people who do ugly behaviour for the fear that people will start filming them.
But then again to showcase ugly behaviour on the media (with the face and all that) may bring about unneccesary humiliation instead, especially in cases where the supposedly 'ugly behaviour' is all but just a misunderstanding, as pointed out by some forumer here.Sometimes, when we see somebody behaving in a certain manner on the streets, we start to point fingers and say this say that, when in fact we don't even know the full context of the situation at all.
Let's say we saw a father beating up his child on the street. We may cry out, 'child abuse!'. But for all we know that father could have been previously very tolerant and patient towards that child, who still choose to behave in an extremely naughty and disrespectful way, causing that father to finally 'blow up'.
Besides, everyone's standard of morality is different. Who are we to say that what other people is doing is wrong and deserve having his/her actions being put up on the media?
-
What in the world has the government got to do with this?
Don't make them look more powerful than they already are...
-
I oppose this project by Class 95.
Too intrusive and oppressive.
I am against it.
Class 95, please end this nonsense.
Very disruptive to society, what you are doing.
-
it's not right to do so...
-
Originally posted by annoy-you-must:
But then again to showcase ugly behaviour on the media (with the face and all that) may bring about unneccesary humiliation instead, especially in cases where the supposedly 'ugly behaviour' is all but just a misunderstanding, as pointed out by some forumer here.Sometimes, when we see somebody behaving in a certain manner on the streets, we start to point fingers and say this say that, when in fact we don't even know the full context of the situation at all.
Let's say we saw a father beating up his child on the street. We may cry out, 'child abuse!'. But for all we know that father could have been previously very tolerant and patient towards that child, who still choose to behave in an extremely naughty and disrespectful way, causing that father to finally 'blow up'.
Besides, everyone's standard of morality is different. Who are we to say that what other people is doing is wrong and deserve having his/her actions being put up on the media?
Noted your points, you brought up good points. I am against what class95 is doing.