Breaking news: IBA says it did not send letter that LKY testified it did
Wednesday, 02 July 2008
Singapore Democrats
In
the recent defamation suit hearing to assess damages, Mr Lee Kuan Yew
testified in court that the President of the International Bar
Association (IBA) had written to the Law Society of Singapore praising
the judiciary here.
This letter was apparently written following the organisation's annual conference held in Singapore in September last year.
The following is what Mr Lee said in court:
"Your honour, the International Bar Association decided to honour
Singapore and hold its annual conference in this city and you [Dr Chee]
were given an opportunity to present your case, with your complaint
that Singapore lack the rule of law. There were some 3000 lawyers
there.
I think they left Singapore with a very different
impression from what you have projected because we have a letter from
the President of the International Bar Association to the organisers, namely the Law Society of Singapore, how successful the meeting was and
how impressed they were by the standards they found to obtain in the
judiciary - " (see here also)
But the IBA has confirmed to the SDP that there was no such letter.
According to the IBA its president did not write such a letter. The Law
Society of Singapore has also denied that it has received any such
letter from the IBA.
An IBA official said: "If there is another source of this letter, we do not know about it."
Mr Lee gave this evidence in the witness box during cross-examination by Dr Chee Soon Juan on 27 May 08.
The SDP will seek legal advice on this latest development.
In a related matter, Mr Lee's press secretary wrote to the Wall Street Journal stating that Dr Chee had called Singapore leaders "murderers, robbers, child molesters" and "rapists" in open court.
Dr
Chee clearly said no such thing and has written to the newspaper
challenging the Minister Mentor to produce the records showing that he
(Dr Chee) did. (See here).
http://www.yoursdp.org/index.php/component/content/article/1-singapore/576-breaking
Giving false evidence.
191. Whoever, being legally bound by an oath, or by any express provision of law to state the truth, or being bound by law to make a declaration upon any subject, makes any statement which is false, and which he either knows or believes to be false, or does not believe to be true, is said to give false evidence.
Fabricating false evidence.
192. Whoever causes any circumstances to exist, or makes any false entry in any book or record or electronic record, or makes any document or electronic record containing a false statement, intending that such circumstance, false entry, or false statement may appear in evidence in a judicial proceeding, or in a proceeding taken by law before a public servant as such, or before an arbitrator, and that such circumstances, false entry, or false statement, so appearing in evidence, may cause any person, who in such proceeding is to form an opinion upon the evidence, to entertain an erroneous opinion touching any point material to the result of such proceeding, is said “to fabricate false evidence”.
Punishment for false evidence.
193. Whoever intentionally gives false evidence in any stage of a judicial proceeding, or fabricates false evidence for the purpose of being used in any stage of a judicial proceeding, shall be punished with imprisonment for a term which may extend to 7 years, and shall also be liable to fine; and whoever intentionally gives or fabricates false evidence in any other case, shall be punished with imprisonment for a term which may extend to 3 years, and shall also be liable to fine.
I hope that Lee Kuan Yew did not lie.
But if he did, I won't be surprised at all.
SDP should sue Lee Kuan Yew.
Hey mainstream state propaganda media, can report on this news or not?
Malaysia politics, anwar keep on report, Lee Kuan Yew alleged to be a liar, don't report.
Don't be such a fucker lah state propaganda media.
Report OK?
Thanks.
State propaganda media made a big noise on Tan Lead Shakes's family murder case.
I see whether they got report big big on Lee Kuan Yew alleged of lying case.
Don't be fucking bastard hor, state propaganda media, opposition murder case report big big, Lee Kuan Yew case keep quiet.
Don't be bastard, I warn you.
Originally posted by Poh Ah Pak:I hope that Lee Kuan Yew did not lie.
But if he did, I won't be surprised at all.
SDP should sue Lee Kuan Yew.
Hey mainstream state propaganda media, can report on this news or not?
Malaysia politics, anwar keep on report, Lee Kuan Yew alleged to be a liar, don't report.
Don't be such a fucker lah state propaganda media.
Report OK?
Thanks.
Yah, and those sitting in Gombak HQ, got read this or not? Got feedback to your boss or not? Or you just filter it?
If state propaganda media don't report on Lee Kuan Yew case, I will regard them as bastard media.
Originally posted by Poh Ah Pak:If state propaganda media don't report on Lee Kuan Yew case, I will regard them as bastard media.
Don't place hope on the state media, you know well they are all under the control of Lee Kuan Yew. If Mr Lee says yes, nobody dares says no.
Originally posted by Poh Ah Pak:Breaking news: IBA says it did not send letter that LKY testified it did
Wednesday, 02 July 2008 Singapore Democrats
In the recent defamation suit hearing to assess damages, Mr Lee Kuan Yew testified in court that the President of the International Bar Association (IBA) had written to the Law Society of Singapore praising the judiciary here.
This letter was apparently written following the organisation's annual conference held in Singapore in September last year.
The following is what Mr Lee said in court:
"Your honour, the International Bar Association decided to honour Singapore and hold its annual conference in this city and you [Dr Chee] were given an opportunity to present your case, with your complaint that Singapore lack the rule of law. There were some 3000 lawyers there.
I think they left Singapore with a very different impression from what you have projected because we have a letter from the President of the International Bar Association to the organisers, namely the Law Society of Singapore, how successful the meeting was and how impressed they were by the standards they found to obtain in the judiciary - " (see here also)
But the IBA has confirmed to the SDP that there was no such letter. According to the IBA its president did not write such a letter. The Law Society of Singapore has also denied that it has received any such letter from the IBA.
An IBA official said: "If there is another source of this letter, we do not know about it."
Mr Lee gave this evidence in the witness box during cross-examination by Dr Chee Soon Juan on 27 May 08.
The SDP will seek legal advice on this latest development.
In a related matter, Mr Lee's press secretary wrote to the Wall Street Journal stating that Dr Chee had called Singapore leaders "murderers, robbers, child molesters" and "rapists" in open court.
Dr Chee clearly said no such thing and has written to the newspaper challenging the Minister Mentor to produce the records showing that he (Dr Chee) did. (See here).http://www.yoursdp.org/index.php/component/content/article/1-singapore/576-breaking
LKY called CSJ liar and a few other names in a defamation suit against CSJ.
If there is a rule of law here the court will probably want to stop LKY from such name calling in a defamation suit which main objective is to stop anyone from defaming another without fear or favor treating all as equal.
Now I am totally surprised that the letter praising the Singapore judiciary for rule of law record introduced in court as evidence to support LKY defamation charge against CSJ may itself be faked as found by IBA.
If this is the case, that the IBA letter turns out to be faked then will it be a retrial in the interest of justice and to uphold Singapore reputation for rule of law as contended by LKY in court.
IBA should just declare publicly that they did not send the letter and make this known internationally. If they don't stop this nuisance, anyone from any country can claim anything that IBA send.
I hope Lee Kuan Yew is not that shameless a bastard as to lie saying that IBA sent letter praising Singapore judiciary, when in fact no such letter was ever sent.
He can't be that shameless - can he?
i'm more interested in what would happen to the press secretary... will she be sued for defamation by Dr Chee? i jolly well hope she does... PAY BACK TIME!! xD
Honest mistake lah.
Let's move on. ![]()
Dr. Vivian Bala has hibernated for quite a season already probably to make people forget his past failure to deliver results of his portfolio as minister for remaking of Singapore. Has he remade the dirty politics and all the suing of fellow citizens taking part in political process.
If he has remade Singapore then we will listen to his advice out of respect for good works done.
Now to remind us he is still the talent so he reappeared after the hiberation for quite a season and said like wiseman that internet will determine politics of the future.
Very good. This thread in highly political and it is about the future in every word posted.
If he wants to win few more votes for his non-GRC colleagues he should reply to this IBA faked letter to clear up for his party all the lies or seeming lies told in court in this latest defamation suit against CSJ.
He should answer a simple question here: Is CSJ entitled to defence of fair comment or bring up issue of public interest in this defamation case.
Originally posted by Poh Ah Pak:Breaking news: IBA says it did not send letter that LKY testified it did
Wednesday, 02 July 2008 Singapore Democrats
In the recent defamation suit hearing to assess damages, Mr Lee Kuan Yew testified in court that the President of the International Bar Association (IBA) had written to the Law Society of Singapore praising the judiciary here.
This letter was apparently written following the organisation's annual conference held in Singapore in September last year.
The following is what Mr Lee said in court:
"Your honour, the International Bar Association decided to honour Singapore and hold its annual conference in this city and you [Dr Chee] were given an opportunity to present your case, with your complaint that Singapore lack the rule of law. There were some 3000 lawyers there.
I think they left Singapore with a very different impression from what you have projected because we have a letter from the President of the International Bar Association to the organisers, namely the Law Society of Singapore, how successful the meeting was and how impressed they were by the standards they found to obtain in the judiciary - " (see here also)
But the IBA has confirmed to the SDP that there was no such letter. According to the IBA its president did not write such a letter. The Law Society of Singapore has also denied that it has received any such letter from the IBA.
An IBA official said: "If there is another source of this letter, we do not know about it."
Mr Lee gave this evidence in the witness box during cross-examination by Dr Chee Soon Juan on 27 May 08.
The SDP will seek legal advice on this latest development.
In a related matter, Mr Lee's press secretary wrote to the Wall Street Journal stating that Dr Chee had called Singapore leaders "murderers, robbers, child molesters" and "rapists" in open court.
Dr Chee clearly said no such thing and has written to the newspaper challenging the Minister Mentor to produce the records showing that he (Dr Chee) did. (See here).http://www.yoursdp.org/index.php/component/content/article/1-singapore/576-breaking
it will be interesting to see who is/are lying.
Hi CSJ and their local and foreign buddies,
May i know Where are the damn evidences?
Officers of IBA and Law Society shall not act like officials
of PRC where they do not identity themselves even
they provide info or not.
Questions:
Who are the official from IBA and SLS that give you the answers?
If SDP cannot give the answers by Friday 4 July noon,
SDP shall retract this statement and apology .
BTW,have the CEC of SDP authorized any materials
in this site?Or www.yoursdp.org just a personal site?
But the IBA has confirmed to the SDP that there was no such letter. According to the IBA its president did not write such a letter. The Law Society of Singapore has also denied that it has received any such letter from the IBA.
An IBA official said: "If there is another source of this letter, we do not know about it."
Originally posted by lionnoisy:Hi CSJ and their local and foreign buddies,
May i know Where are the damn evidences?
Officers of IBA and Law Society shall not act like officials
of PRC where they do not identity themselves even
they provide info or not.
Questions:
Who are the official from IBA and SLS that give you the answers?
If SDP cannot give the answers by Friday 4 July noon,
SDP shall retract this statement and apology .
BTW,have the CEC of SDP authorized any materials
in this site?Or www.yoursdp.org just a personal site?
Wouldn;t it be more approriate that LKY show the 'letter of proof?' that the President of IBA wrote?
IBA is non government affiliated, why would it need to drag itself into dirty politics of some country??
Originally posted by 4getmenot:Wouldn;t it be more approriate that LKY show the 'letter of proof?' that the President of IBA wrote?
IBA is non government affiliated, why would it need to drag itself into dirty politics of some country??
CSJ accuses LKY.CSJ shall show proof.Anyway he needs when
he wants to fix LKY in court.
BTW,Why did he not telling us here that STimes published
his long letter in May?
Originally posted by 4getmenot:Wouldn;t it be more approriate that LKY show the 'letter of proof?' that the President of IBA wrote?
IBA is non government affiliated, why would it need to drag itself into dirty politics of some country??
Really can't believe it that Lee Kuan Yew has stooped this low to create a fake letter. Mr Lee to produce the letter as proof and let IBA verify. I want to know the outcome if it is a fake letter. Mr Lee will have to act fast if not there will be further tarnish to his image. If the letter is proven fake, hope he is willing to accept that people question his credibility.
Originally posted by lionnoisy:CSJ accuses LKY.CSJ shall show proof.Anyway he needs when
he wants to fix LKY in court.
BTW,Why did he not telling us here that STimes published
his long letter in May?
CSJ accused LKY ?
Was it not LKY who accused CSJ of lying about the standards of the Singapore Judiciary, and that it was LKY who claimed that had the letter from the IBA President that is now in dispute ?
Has the noisylion now learnt the voodoo art not well enough - in not turning the table around too hard that it will spin to its original position ?
Originally posted by lionnoisy:CSJ accuses LKY.CSJ shall show proof.Anyway he needs when
he wants to fix LKY in court.
BTW,Why did he not telling us here that STimes published
his long letter in May?
so? LKY has to show proof of letter to proof CSJ is lying right? how can CSJ show proof when the letter is not suppose to exists at all?
your reply made me laugh real hard... xD
Lao Lee still old liao still want to lie....
Sigh....
Maybe he's getting senile or his Parkinson's getting worse such that he's spouting nonsense.![]()
Still waiting for proof.