How to prevent the despots cutting Singaporean wages again?
-
Originally posted by TemplarKnight:
Lucifer is calling you. Why dont you join him for a feast there? Now is lunch time.
Still trying to make desperate sense of your own hapless folly?
-
Originally posted by walesa:
Are you retarded? Been harping on and on about my posts without actually realising I'd cited his quote in an earlier post of mine?Why don't you just scroll up? (I hope this isn't beyond your fundamental capability)
Then do not expect me to answer your question. If you cannot be bothered to do this. -
Originally posted by Beautiful951:
Then do not expect me to answer your question. If you cannot be bothered to do this.
That just proves your folly as well, doesn't it? Claiming to understand something without realizing something so blatantly obvious?That said, and understanding your intellectual handicaps, I'd kindly stuck up your challenge for you to enlighten someone less "cleverer"...
(All assuming you're even capable of answering anything remotely reasonable in the first place)
-
Originally posted by Beautiful951:
Then do not expect me to answer your question. If you cannot be bothered to do this.comon friend we go for lunch... let him join Lucifer for his buffet lunch.
-
aiyoh... of coz better cut wages than cut job wat.... if inefficiency result in job loss hor... where u going to get that million paying job out there? better to reduce a couple of hundred thousands than loss the whole million dollar deal.
my 2 cts worth.
He means, having less pay in the job is better than having no job at all. After all, its a million dollars even with a pay cut. Better to lose a few hundred thousand than the whole million.
I believe he is talking about the government.
-
Originally posted by TemplarKnight:
comon friend we go for lunch... let him join Lucifer for his buffet lunch.
On another bout of schizophrenia? -
Originally posted by Beautiful951:
He means, having less pay in the job is better than having no job at all. After all, its a million dollars even with a pay cut. Better to lose a few hundred thousand than the whole million.
I believe he is talking about the government.
So, in your esteemed opinion, would the following post suggest he's actually in support of the regime?
watever crap theory of efficiency wage model or wat... just an excuse to hold on to million paying job.
-
I am having the feeling that you are playing ignorance so that you do not have to argue against his posts. I do not even need to think to translate thenm for you.
-
Originally posted by Beautiful951:
I am having the feeling that you are playing ignorance so that you do not have to argue against his posts. I do not even need to think to translate thenm for you.
I have a feeling you're actually butting in without actually knowing what you're talking about. Actually, it's not an intuition - it's reality...So, just to enable your "flexibility" to enlighten less "cleverer" souls like myself, why don't you just address the previous post?
Was it meant to support or oppose this regime?
-
Originally posted by walesa:
So, in your esteemed opinion, would the following post suggest he's actually in support of the regime?
But if you insist, I will also translate for you.He is talking about the government. He is saying that, the government is making up an excuse to cover up their mistakes, whatever it is. So they do not have to step down.
Is he right? I don't know. I am just the interpreter.
-
Originally posted by walesa:
I have a feeling you're actually butting in without actually knowing what you're talking about. Actually, it's not an intuition - it's reality...So, just to enable your "flexibility" to enlighten less "cleverer" souls like myself, why don't you just address the previous post?
Was it meant to support or oppose this regime?
It was meant to oppose this regime.
I think that the poster does not like the fact that the government is drawing a high salary.
-
Originally posted by Beautiful951:
But if you insist, I will also translate for you.He is talking about the government. He is saying that, the government is making up an excuse to cover up their mistakes, whatever it is. So they do not have to step down.
Is he right? I don't know. I am just the interpreter.
Well, so let's assume you're right (since you're supposedly "cleverer" than me, given the fact you understand him while I allegedly don't), why don't you try reconciling his warped perceptions which were actually in response to my following quote?And you forgot to mention the fact that their justification that it's "better to cut wages than jobs" runs contrary to the principles of the efficiency wage model.
In short, if the fascists could be trusted, J.M. Keynes has got to be one of the biggest idiots of all-time...
Amazingly, you've been such an ardent and learnt observer of the whole episode that you've actually failed to realize his folly is misinterpreting my stance. Now, that's truly incredible for someone supposedly "cleverer", isn't it?
Do you now actually realize the folly of that mindless idiot who doesn't realize he'd actually been ever-eager to pounce on someone who is effectively on the same side of the coin as he is?
-
Originally posted by walesa:
Well, so let's assume you're right (since you're supposedly "cleverer" than me, given the fact you understand him while I allegedly don't), why don't you try reconciling his warped perceptions which were actually in response to my following quote?Amazingly, you've been such an ardent and learnt observer of the whole episode that you've actually failed to realize his folly is misinterpreting my stance. Now, that's truly incredible for someone supposedly "cleverer", isn't it?
Do you now actually realize the folly of that mindless idiot who doesn't realize he'd actually been ever-eager to pounce on someone who is effectively on the same side of the coin as he is?
I don't know. But its the norm of speakers corner that they pounce on people whose names are unfamiliar.
-
Originally posted by Beautiful951:
I don't know. But its the norm of speakers corner that they pounce on people whose names are unfamiliar.
I'm not offended - rather, the whole episode just illustrates the idiocy of someone espousing mindless rhetoric whom you perceive to be making sense.So, what were you trying to prove by butting onto a bandwagon (when you obviously weren't following proceedings) to defend a supposedly "cleverer" moron who obviously has trouble comprehending simple logic in basic English?
-
Originally posted by walesa:
I'm not offended - rather, the whole episode just illustrates the idiocy of someone espousing mindless rhetoric whom you perceive to be making sense.So, what were you trying to prove by butting onto a bandwagon (when you obviously weren't following proceedings) to defend a supposedly "cleverer" moron who obviously has trouble comprehending simple logic in basic English?
I am trying to prove that his words can be dephiphered. And that it is not gibberish that he speaks.
-
Originally posted by Beautiful951:
I am trying to prove that his words can be dephiphered. And that it is not gibberish that he speaks.
All you've proven is the fact that his words are nothing but irrelevant drivel completely cited out of context.Amazingly, his inaptitude is so mind-boggling that he'd actually linked the efficiency wage model to a brainchild engineered by this regime - quite a surprising and remarkable achievement for someone "cleverer", isn't it?
-
Originally posted by walesa:
All you've proven is the fact that his words are nothing but irrelevant drivel completely cited out of context.Amazingly, his inaptitude is so mind-boggling that he'd actually linked the efficiency wage model to a brainchild engineered by this regime - quite a surprising and remarkable achievement for someone "cleverer", isn't it?
Really? I didn't notice that.
-
let him win.... someone who is so intelligent so eloquent.... such a pity...
-
Originally posted by Beautiful951:
Really? I didn't notice that.
About time you did then.. -
Originally posted by TemplarKnight:
let him win.... someone who is so intelligent so eloquent.... such a pity...
What can you not live with? The fact that you can't ascribe simple logic to its appropriate context?
-
Originally posted by walesa:
What can you not live with? The fact that you can't ascribe simple logic to its appropriate context?You are certainly very patient with the clones...
-
Originally posted by AndrewPKYap:
You are certainly very patient with the clones...
-
i live in a world of fools and self proclaims smartass... Such a sorry place....
-
Originally posted by TemplarKnight:
i live in a world of fools and self proclaims smartass... Such a sorry place....
You do, indeed - and in fact wouldn't look out of place being one yourself... -
the pot calling ketle black.
maybe that smart person can answer how many is 1+1=???