1st world country, 3rd world situation, Uniquely Singapore
-
Originally posted by O o O:
Please try to stay focus and dont get carried away by all the small talk with all the empty vessel in this forum.
Can you back up what you said with facts and to prove to us that you are right to make the following statement?
1) It is more cost effective for government to give out money to people using age class instead of income class.
2) You claim that company can benefit from employing housewife to do nothing.
3) You claim that company can pay employee only CPF contribution and not salary
4) You claim that it is not illegal to evade tax by employing dummy employee to that does nothing.
Are u Lies?
-
Originally posted by Midlusionz:
Are u Lies?
What do you think?
-
Originally posted by eagle:
What do you think?
Please try to stay focus and dont get carried away by all the small talk with all the empty vessel in this forum.
Can you back up what you said with facts and to prove to us that you are right to make the following statement?
1) It is more cost effective for government to give out money to people using age class instead of income class.
2) You claim that company can benefit from employing housewife to do nothing.
3) You claim that company can pay employee only CPF contribution and not salary
4) You claim that it is not illegal to evade tax by employing dummy employee to that does nothing.
-
Let him answer bah
-
Originally posted by Midlusionz:
Let him answer bah
He might not answer you.
Autism is distinguished by a pattern of symptoms rather than one single symptom. The main characteristics are impairments in social interaction, impairments in communication, restricted interests and repetitive behavior.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Autism
This troll exhibits all of the four main characteristics here, especially the last underlined one.
-
Eagle, please try to stay focus and dont get carried away by all the small talk with all the empty vessel in this forum.
Can you back up what you said with facts and to prove to us that you are right to make the following statement?
1) It is more cost effective for government to give out money to people using age class instead of income class.
2) You claim that company can benefit from employing housewife to do nothing.
3) You claim that company can pay employee only CPF contribution and not salary
4) You claim that it is not illegal to evade tax by employing dummy employee to that does nothing.
-
LOL evading question LOL
-
Originally posted by Midlusionz:
LOL evading question LOL
You think he will answer you?
Let him focus on his "restricted interest" and "repetitive behaviour" first la
-
Originally posted by eagle:
You think he will answer you?
Let him focus on his "restricted interest" and "repetitive behaviour" first la
Originally posted by O o O:Eagle, please try to stay focus and dont get carried away by all the small talk with all the empty vessel in this forum.
Can you back up what you said with facts and to prove to us that you are right to make the following statement?
1) It is more cost effective for government to give out money to people using age class instead of income class.
2) You claim that company can benefit from employing housewife to do nothing.
3) You claim that company can pay employee only CPF contribution and not salary
4) You claim that it is not illegal to evade tax by employing dummy employee to that does nothing.
eagle, you are honoured. Everyone of us is empty vessel, he only wants to engage discussion with you. ROFL.
-
Originally posted by O o O:
Eagle, please try to stay focus and dont get carried away by all the small talk with all the empty vessel in this forum.
Can you back up what you said with facts and to prove to us that you are right to make the following statement?
1) It is more cost effective for government to give out money to people using age class instead of income class.
2) You claim that company can benefit from employing housewife to do nothing.
3) You claim that company can pay employee only CPF contribution and not salary
4) You claim that it is not illegal to evade tax by employing dummy employee to that does nothing.
Let me answer you. I don't know the answer to all of them.
-
Originally posted by O o O:
Eagle, please try to stay focus and dont get carried away by all the small talk with all the empty vessel in this forum.
Can you back up what you said with facts and to prove to us that you are right to make the following statement?
1) It is more cost effective for government to give out money to people using age class instead of income class.
2) You claim that company can benefit from employing housewife to do nothing.
3) You claim that company can pay employee only CPF contribution and not salary
4) You claim that it is not illegal to evade tax by employing dummy employee to that does nothing.
Mr Lies,
You no get it eh ?
People don't want to talk to you lah. Ask so many times also no use ok?
Why don't you try begging ?
-
Originally posted by jojobeach:
Mr Lies,
You no get it eh ?
People don't want to talk to you lah. Ask so many times also no use ok?
Why don't you try begging ?
You also realised his autistic nature :D
-
Originally posted by eagle:
You also realised his autistic nature :D
Eagle, please try to stay focus on the subject and dont get carried away by all the meaningless small talks with all the empty vessel in this forum.
Can you back up what you said with facts and to prove to us that you are right to make the following statements?
1) It is more cost effective for government to give out money to people using age class instead of income class.
2) You claim that company can benefit from employing housewife to do nothing.
3) You claim that company can pay employee only CPF contribution and not salary
4) You claim that it is not illegal to evade tax by employing dummy employee to that does nothing.
-
LOL HE'S FUNNY! LOL His evade rating like fuk LOL
-
Originally posted by Midlusionz:
LOL HE'S FUNNY! LOL His evade rating like fuk LOL
I honestly doubt you have what it takes to contribute to this thread and thats why you are fuking yourself vigorously on the sideline
-
I think the word internet troll has become a heavily abused word.
It seems that everybody associated with supporting the government is automatically labelled as a troll and then people start a lot of insulting messages on them and dismissing all their posts.
Those people that start to hurl the verbal abuses that really disrupt the flow of the discussion and baiting others to retaliate are the real trolls.
-
Originally posted by O o O:
I honestly doubt you have what it takes to contribute to this thread and thats why you are fuking yourself vigorously on the sideline
Go on go on lol finally got something to get back at me? +1 to u
-
Originally posted by reservistsianz:
I think the word internet troll has become a heavily abused word.
It seems that everybody associated with supporting the government is automatically labelled as a troll and then people start a lot of insulting messages on them and dismissing all their posts.
Those people that start to hurl the verbal abuses that really disrupt the flow of the discussion and baiting others to retaliate are the real trolls.
Those people that start to hurl the verbal abuses that really disrupt the flow of the discussion and baiting others to retaliate are the real trolls.
Yep, like the one 2 posts above.
-
Originally posted by eagle:
Yep, like the one 2 posts above.
Eagle, please try to stay focus on the subject and dont get carried away by all the meaningless small talks with all the empty vessel in this forum.
Can you back up what you said with facts and to prove to us that you are right to make the following statements?
1) It is more cost effective for government to give out money to people using age class instead of income class.
2) You claim that company can benefit from employing housewife to do nothing.
3) You claim that company can pay employee only CPF contribution and not salary
4) You claim that it is not illegal to evade tax by employing dummy employee to that does nothing.
-
Sighs.
Some folks are really stupid.
-
Originally posted by maurizio13:
Sighs.
Some folks are really stupid.
Autistic nature
Can't blame them
-
Originally posted by maurizio13:
Sighs.
Some folks are really stupid.
Like the 2 forummers who goes around telling people that property prices will move inline with inflation and using US military base petrol price to compare to Singapore pump price.btw, do you have any comments on the following: -
1) It is more cost effective for government to give out money to people using age class instead of income class.
2) You claim that company can benefit from employing housewife to do nothing.
3) You claim that company can pay employee only CPF contribution and not salary
4) You claim that it is not illegal to evade tax by employing dummy employee to that does nothing.
-
Originally posted by eagle:
Autistic nature
Can't blame them
Some folks still don't understand that property makes good hedges against inflation.Despite showing him all the reports.
http://www.rst.nus.edu.sg/staff/singtienfoo/dollarDEX%20seminar%20-%203%20Aug.ppt
-
I wonder if it's easier (cost effective) for government to determine the age of an individual or his income for the year.
I wonder if there is any law that forbids anybody to employ staff to sit around and do nothing.
-
Originally posted by maurizio13:
I wonder if it's easier (cost effective) for government to determine the age of an individual or his income for the year.
I wonder if there is any law that forbids me to employ staff to sit around and do nothing.
The rest of the 3 questions, I guess trolls just can't read and want to show their autistic nature