Singapore ranked 5th most expensive city in Asia
-
Originally posted by I-like-flings(m):
what u trying to show us here??? that most things are more ex in sg than in hk??? except for rental? see my post up right?? if u did .. go guess why hk rental seems to be HIGHER in ur table lor.... even higher than in tokyo....the answer can be found in my previous post lor.....
You are claiming that the reason you pay more in Tokyo is because of quality. So can you tell us what is so special about the Hamburger meal in Tokyo? -
Originally posted by Midlusionz:
Living in this own world.
I remember HK govt waiving maid levy of $400 a month for a period of two years for middlle income families in order to soften the burden of high inflation. -
Originally posted by Fantagf:
Channel NewsAsia - Thursday, July 24
Singapore ranked fifth most expensive city in Asia
SINGAPORE: Singapore is now the fifth most expensive city in Asia, according to Mercer Worldwide Cost of Living Survey.
Singapore’s rise in rankings is partly due to the appreciation of the Singapore dollar against the US dollar.
Other contributing factors include its high quality of living and continued strength as a regional hub.
Tokyo is the costliest Asian city, followed by Seoul, Hong Kong and Osaka.
In world standings, Singapore is in 13th position, one notch higher than in 2007.
Moscow was ranked the most expensive city both in Europe and globally for the third year running.
Mercer’s survey covered 143 countries across six continents. — CNA/de
Is this good news to Singaporeans and the ruling party?
Can it mean that there is room for climbing up the ranking?
-
Mercer does not seems to provide the statistic for earning of the cities so it is hard to do a comparison. Another survey done is the city mayor economics
If u look at cost of living, singapore is ranked 38th world wide and 5th in asia.
http://www.citymayors.com/economics/expensive_cities2.html
If u look at earning or richest city in the world, singapore is rank 36th and 4th in asia. The funny thing is singapore is supposedly earning more than hong kong people and cost lesser than hong kong in the survey
http://www.citymayors.com/economics/richest_cities.html
Of course, people r gonna say I am an "internet troll", work for the gov and treat me like a dog, the figures r out for people to see. Do u know why there r lesser and lesser posting for the gov, because there r people tat hurl verbal abuses to people who genuinely felt the gov had done a good job.
My best advise is, just bear with such insults. Though they r numbered more, tis sort of negative propaganda will work against them eventually.
-
Services is alot better than in sg....... u go eat then u come tell mi lor.. i told u but u dun believe what
-
Originally posted by stupidissmart:
Mercer does not seems to provide the statistic for earning of the cities so it is hard to do a comparison. Another survey done is the city mayor economics
If u look at cost of living, singapore is ranked 38th world wide and 5th in asia.
http://www.citymayors.com/economics/expensive_cities2.html
If u look at earning or richest city in the world, singapore is rank 36th and 4th in asia. The funny thing is singapore is supposedly earning more than hong kong people and cost lesser than hong kong in the survey
Earning more??? ya all the MP u mean right???
-
Must.
Become.
Number.
1.
-
Originally posted by stupidissmart:
The funny thing is singapore is supposedly earning more than hong kong people and cost lesser than hong kong in the survey
pls get your head check b4 your post such comments again. you are already deep in negative territory already. -
COSTS
Hong kong is positioned 35th with an index of 72.3
SIngapore is positioned 38th with an index of 70.5
From the survey, singapore is cheaper
EARNINGS
Singapore is positioned 36th with an index of 45
Hong kong is positioned 42 with index 35.4
From the survey singapore earns more than hong kongers.
Wat is wrong with the conclusions based on the survey ?
I know I am in deep negative territories. Tis is because there r people like u, fatagf, eagle, maurizio and guantenginator who just blindly scold all supporters for nothing.
-
a
Tis is because there r people like u, fatagf, eagle, maurizio and guantenginator who just blindly scold all supporters for nothing.
You need to justify the above statements.
I can easily prove you wrong because I have made before comments supporting the government in some policies. So has redDust. You can ask the forumers around for this.
It would be better for you if you don't generalise.
Btw, what happened to the email reply of your 'efficient' IRAS?
-
Wah, so li hai
-
Originally posted by Jingojingjing:
Can it mean that there is room for climbing up the ranking?
Yes, of course. -
the person that want give me S$200 is gone??? i still waiting for the money. or just NATO only?
-
Originally posted by freedom4ever:
the person that want give me S$200 is gone??? i still waiting for the money. or just NATO only?
Who is that person who wants to give you $200? -
Originally posted by Fantagf:
Who is that person who wants to give you $200?read page 3. someone out of nowhere come scold me dog then want give me S$200.
-
Originally posted by freedom4ever:
read page 3. someone out of nowhere come scold me dog then want give me S$200.
OIC. He does not surf here everyday. He calls M M Lee his son. So may be he is seeking approval from his son before giving you $200.Happy waiting.
-
Originally posted by eagle:
a
You need to justify the above statements.
I can easily prove you wrong because I have made before comments supporting the government in some policies. So has redDust. You can ask the forumers around for this.
It would be better for you if you don't generalise.
Btw, what happened to the email reply of your 'efficient' IRAS?
I don't think anyone mentioned by that person "stupid. . . . .." scolds supporters blindly. Misinterpretation again. OMG. It is the other way round.
-
I can easily prove you wrong because I have made before comments supporting the government in some policies. So has redDust. You can ask the forumers around for this.
It would be better for you if you don't generalise.
My impression now is tat there r really a lot of people who r anti PAP and they r literally scolding the people who think otherwise. As said people have different interpretation of current events. Why is it necessary to resort to such attacks. I do not know if u have posted comments supporting the gov before, but the recent posts seemed to be pretty offending and does not aid discussion
Btw, what happened to the email reply of your 'efficient' IRAS?
I posted the reply on IRAS. Now the only letter left is from the ministry of manpower
-
Originally posted by stupidissmart:
My impression now is tat there r really a lot of people who r anti PAP and they r literally scolding the people who think otherwise. As said people have different interpretation of current events. Why is it necessary to resort to such attacks. I do not know if u have posted comments supporting the gov before, but the recent posts seemed to be pretty offending and does not aid discussion
I posted the reply on IRAS. Now the only letter left is from the ministry of manpower
Sounds like the forumer who wrote the above expects praises and agreement with the govt blindly, nothing less.
Oh, my godly, blind me! -
Originally posted by stupidissmart:
My impression now is tat there r really a lot of people who r anti PAP and they r literally scolding the people who think otherwise. As said people have different interpretation of current events. Why is it necessary to resort to such attacks. I do not know if u have posted comments supporting the gov before, but the recent posts seemed to be pretty offending and does not aid discussion
You mean our recent discussions in which you made statements to the effect of
"it is illegal because it is not listed in the gazette"
and in which I pointed out your errors, you would say I resort to attacks?????
And especially with your statement,
I do not know if u have posted comments supporting the gov before, but the recent posts seemed to be pretty offending and does not aid discussion
you have shown yourself yet again to be pretty shallow and quick to generalisation, not to mention that you have not explained why recent posts do not aid in discussion.
In your logic, if you do not know if the government has managed anything well before, you would claim that, with the recent increases in taxes here and there, and expenses here and there, the government must be pretty bad at managing money and the economy.
-
and in which I pointed out your errors, you would say I resort to attacks?????
Tat is not an attack. U pointed my errors, I also pointed out yours. Tat is a discussion and we do not resort to name calling and agree on certain points once it is proven.
U want to know wat is attack ? Look for the below examples
In IBA: Prosperity versus individual rights
hi Stupi,
have the affected people or organization sued IBA?
If not why do you think so?
any idea?
Can you fetch us some info.
will give u some tasty treats. ;)
tchuss!!
Atobe is credible as compared to those trolls here. He reasons well and knows the situation in Singapore as for the other 2 to 3 trolls here, they are here just to expect to read posts that are pleasing to them. If posts are not pleasing to them, they start their nuisance, spoilt, troublemaking is in their blood. These trolls are good in twisting their words.
I simply skip their postings (often long winded) whenever I see trolls posting here. No offence to them , its just that I already know their motive and simply have no time to waste on trollism. They are the worst forms of existence.
There is also Atobe tat probably spam so much insults it can filled up to thosands of words. In fact he spams insults to any body who seemed to be associated with PAP supporter. Isn't tis bullying people to follow his view ?
From Speak the truths but don't be insulting & partisan
PRP
Not true.
How about speaking honestly & sincerely?
From 1st world country, 3rd world situation, Uniquely Singapore
From eagle
Yep, like the one 2 posts above.
And of course there r a lot of bullying on O o O
I do not really go to the root of the problem on why suddenly everyone seems to be against him , however the amount of bullying and name calling on him is really discouraging. The way things r used to described him r pretty cruel.
-
And of course there r a lot of bullying on O o O
I do not really go to the root of the problem on why suddenly everyone seems to be against him , however the amount of bullying and name calling on him is really discouraging. The way things r used to described him r pretty cruel.
So do you know who O o O is and what he has done?
I would like to point out to you that his other accounts were
Gazelle, Love Supreme, TCH05, Pekei, Chinkara, Guttorosa, Mammalia, Aelop, Point_Blank, DeerHunter, 4 different versions of LIES, few childish versions insulting the moderators, and now this is his newest nick. Each account has been banned because of his childishness and behaviour.
Do have one single discussion in which you disagree with him, and you will understand his childishness, autism and many other bad character traits.
I don't resort to attacks on all govt supporters; only to Gazelle, whom if you point out his mistakes (like what I did recently when he mentioned tax invasion), will resort to insults and vulgarities to divert away.
Please do not list yourself together with him; you will be demeaning yourself if you do that. It will be more discouraging for you if you support him.
-
If u look at the attacks I had listed, I and others have been linked with him. I am not doing it to myself but people r doing it to me. If u loook at the posts atobe made, u will realise he do make incredible insults to all people tat support the gov.
-
Originally posted by stupidissmart:
Tat is not an attack. U pointed my errors, I also pointed out yours. Tat is a discussion and we do not resort to name calling and agree on certain points once it is proven.
U want to know wat is attack ? Look for the below examples
In IBA: Prosperity versus individual rights
hi Stupi,
have the affected people or organization sued IBA?
If not why do you think so?
any idea?
Can you fetch us some info.
will give u some tasty treats. ;)
tchuss!!
Atobe is credible as compared to those trolls here. He reasons well and knows the situation in Singapore as for the other 2 to 3 trolls here, they are here just to expect to read posts that are pleasing to them. If posts are not pleasing to them, they start their nuisance, spoilt, troublemaking is in their blood. These trolls are good in twisting their words.
I simply skip their postings (often long winded) whenever I see trolls posting here. No offence to them , its just that I already know their motive and simply have no time to waste on trollism. They are the worst forms of existence.
There is also Atobe tat probably spam so much insults it can filled up to thosands of words. In fact he spams insults to any body who seemed to be associated with PAP supporter. Isn't tis bullying people to follow his view ?
From Speak the truths but don't be insulting & partisan
PRP
Not true.
How about speaking honestly & sincerely?
From 1st world country, 3rd world situation, Uniquely Singapore
From eagle
Yep, like the one 2 posts above.
And of course there r a lot of bullying on O o O
I do not really go to the root of the problem on why suddenly everyone seems to be against him , however the amount of bullying and name calling on him is really discouraging. The way things r used to described him r pretty cruel.
if you resent people addressing you as Stupid, i suggest you change your nick. your nick is a `perpetual ripe fruit ready for a picking'.
-
errrr this is bad....i thot we always wan No.1??
