Happy National Day!
-
Originally posted by yamizi:
AndrewPKYap,I said this 'cos I'm sick of you. You're senile and have selective reading. When you lost your stand you only know how to rally from one small corner, while having no balls yourself yet you're shouting others having no balls.
Wake up.
Since you have acknowledged that you are no more than an animal, we can just leave it as that. We know where you are coming from. It is just typical animal behavior.
-
Originally posted by Mostwanted5125:
Or just join Dr Chee???
He had mentioned that he like to speak without fear or favour, therefore hiding in this corner to make noise.
-
Originally posted by AndrewPKYap:
Since you have acknowledged that you are no more than an animal, we can just leave it as that. We know where you are coming from. It is just typical animal behavior.
Selective reading applied by you again, maybe you like to address why you chose to tar everyone with the same brush?
You behaved no more like a kid yourself, grow up, step out of that house of yours to face reality.
-
Originally posted by Mostwanted5125:
Err Andrew..why not u just migrate.....since u are so sick of living in this "despotic" country???
Or just join Dr Chee???
Obviously ppl here are put off by ur attitude....both supporters and sceptics (of PAP) alike are very clear that U are the deluded one here....
Or maybe u should open a thread and "debate" with ur kind 0o0o0o
Hallo MW5125
-
Originally posted by AndrewPKYap:
Since you have acknowledged that you are no more than an animal, we can just leave it as that. We know where you are coming from. It is just typical animal behavior.
So are you trying to tell others that you're God?
That you're the incarnation of the Divine Justice?
-
Originally posted by yamizi:
He had mentioned that he like to speak without fear or favour, therefore hiding in this corner to make noise.
Animals do not understand the concepts of justice, free speech and other human constructs. It is not surprising that you cannot as well.
-
Originally posted by eagle:
Hallo MW5125
Hallow Eagle
-
Originally posted by Fatum:
you're kidding, right ? ...
At least those are more interesting/entertaining right?
-
Originally posted by eagle:
Hallo MW5125
Wow...I just realise both eagle and MW your post are over 10k leh...
-
Originally posted by yamizi:
So are you trying to tell others that you're God?
That you're the incarnation of the Divine Justice?
You acknowledged that you are no more than an animal, where did I say I am god?
-
halo yamizi
-
Err Andrew...u might like to clarify this with us...On why CSJ is a clown....
‘Nothing to do with political freedom’
MM’s press sec responds to WSJ editorial on Chees’ caseTHE libel case against Dr Chee Soon Juan and his sister had nothing to do with political freedom in Singapore. Instead, “it was for defamation arising from the Chees’ false claims” that Prime Minister Lee Hsien Loong and Minister Mentor Lee Kuan Yew “are criminaland corrupt”. These were among the points raised by Madam Yeong Yoon Ying, press secretary to MM Lee, in her letter to the Asian edition of the Wall Street Journal (WSJ). Mdm Yeong was responding to the newspaper’s editorial titled Democracy in Singapore, which was :published yesterday. “Your editorial ... relying on a ‘partial transcript’, has misunderstood the issue in the libel case involving Dr Chee Soon Juan and his sister,” Mdm Yeong said. In its editorial last Thursday, the newspaper had offered its readers a glimpse of what it described as a “David-vs-Goliath exchange” between Dr Chee, the head of the Singapore Democratic Party (SDP), and MM Lee during last month’s court hearing to assess damages arising from the defamation suit. In 2006, the Chees lost the suit brought by PM Lee and MM Lee over an articleDr Chee had published in the SDP newsletter, which drew parallels between governance in the old National Kidney Foundation and the Singapore Government. Referring to a partial transcript of the courtroom exchange between MM Lee and Dr Chee, the editorial noted: “Mr Chee is no orator, and on one level the dissident was no match for the eloquent Mr Lee. But when the subject turned to the moral underpinnings of democracy — freedoms of speech, assembly and association — the debate went game, set and match toMr Chee.” In her letter, Mdm Yeong noted thatthe Chees had failed “to produce credibledefence or evidence to back up their claims”. She added: “Having lost, Dr Chee in open court then called the Singapore leaders ‘murderers, robbers, child molesters’ and ‘rapists’. The Chees also rebuked the judge, ignored her orders and shouted her down.” Mdm Yeong’s letter prompted Dr Chee to pen his own response. In a letter to the WSJ — which was also posted on his party’s website — Dr Chee challenged her statement that he had called the Singapore leaders by such names. “The outrageousness of Mdm Yeong’s lie borders on the comedic. Mr Lee Kuan Yew, or his counsel, is in possession of court transcripts and audio-recordings that would show whether I had uttered those words. He must now produce the part of the transcript that quotes me saying those words or he risks destroying his own credibility,” Dr Chee wrote. The WSJ editorial had also said that since the MM Lee–Dr Chee exchange took place in a courtroom, the dialogue is “therefore privileged — which means we can report it without risking a lawsuit, which Mr Lee often files against critics”. However, Mdm Yeong noted that “many opposition politicians routinely criticise government leaders, but they are not sued because they have not uttered slanderous falsehoods”. “Contrary to your editorial, Singapore upholds free speech and the right to disagree, subject to the law,” Mdm Yeong said in her letter.
MM’s press sec responds to WSJ editorial on Chees’ caseTHE libel case against Dr Chee Soon Juan and his sister had nothing to do with political freedom in Singapore. Instead, “it was for defamation arising from the Chees’ false claims” that Prime Minister Lee Hsien Loong and Minister Mentor Lee Kuan Yew “are criminaland corrupt”. These were among the points raised by Madam Yeong Yoon Ying, press secretary to MM Lee, in her letter to the Asian edition of the Wall Street Journal (WSJ). Mdm Yeong was responding to the newspaper’s editorial titled Democracy in Singapore, which was :published yesterday. “Your editorial ... relying on a ‘partial transcript’, has misunderstood the issue in the libel case involving Dr Chee Soon Juan and his sister,” Mdm Yeong said. In its editorial last Thursday, the newspaper had offered its readers a glimpse of what it described as a “David-vs-Goliath exchange” between Dr Chee, the head of the Singapore Democratic Party (SDP), and MM Lee during last month’s court hearing to assess damages arising from the defamation suit. In 2006, the Chees lost the suit brought by PM Lee and MM Lee over an articleDr Chee had published in the SDP newsletter, which drew parallels between governance in the old National Kidney Foundation and the Singapore Government. Referring to a partial transcript of the courtroom exchange between MM Lee and Dr Chee, the editorial noted: “Mr Chee is no orator, and on one level the dissident was no match for the eloquent Mr Lee. But when the subject turned to the moral underpinnings of democracy — freedoms of speech, assembly and association — the debate went game, set and match toMr Chee.” In her letter, Mdm Yeong noted thatthe Chees had failed “to produce credibledefence or evidence to back up their claims”. She added: “Having lost, Dr Chee in open court then called the Singapore leaders ‘murderers, robbers, child molesters’ and ‘rapists’. The Chees also rebuked the judge, ignored her orders and shouted her down.” Mdm Yeong’s letter prompted Dr Chee to pen his own response. In a letter to the WSJ — which was also posted on his party’s website — Dr Chee challenged her statement that he had called the Singapore leaders by such names. “The outrageousness of Mdm Yeong’s lie borders on the comedic. Mr Lee Kuan Yew, or his counsel, is in possession of court transcripts and audio-recordings that would show whether I had uttered those words. He must now produce the part of the transcript that quotes me saying those words or he risks destroying his own credibility,” Dr Chee wrote. The WSJ editorial had also said that since the MM Lee–Dr Chee exchange took place in a courtroom, the dialogue is “therefore privileged — which means we can report it without risking a lawsuit, which Mr Lee often files against critics”. However, Mdm Yeong noted that “many opposition politicians routinely criticise government leaders, but they are not sued because they have not uttered slanderous falsehoods”. “Contrary to your editorial, Singapore upholds free speech and the right to disagree, subject to the law,” Mdm Yeong said in her letter.MM’s press sec responds to WSJ editorial on Chees’ caseTHE libel case against Dr Chee Soon Juan and his sister had nothing to do with political freedom in Singapore. Instead, “it was for defamation arising from the Chees’ false claims” that Prime Minister Lee Hsien Loong and Minister Mentor Lee Kuan Yew “are criminaland corrupt”. These were among the points raised by Madam Yeong Yoon Ying, press secretary to MM Lee, in her letter to the Asian edition of the Wall Street Journal (WSJ). Mdm Yeong was responding to the newspaper’s editorial titled Democracy in Singapore, which was :published yesterday. “Your editorial ... relying on a ‘partial transcript’, has misunderstood the issue in the libel case involving Dr Chee Soon Juan and his sister,” Mdm Yeong said. In its editorial last Thursday, the newspaper had offered its readers a glimpse of what it described as a “David-vs-Goliath exchange” between Dr Chee, the head of the Singapore Democratic Party (SDP), and MM Lee during last month’s court hearing to assess damages arising from the defamation suit. In 2006, the Chees lost the suit brought by PM Lee and MM Lee over an articleDr Chee had published in the SDP newsletter, which drew parallels between governance in the old National Kidney Foundation and the Singapore Government. Referring to a partial transcript of the courtroom exchange between MM Lee and Dr Chee, the editorial noted: “Mr Chee is no orator, and on one level the dissident was no match for the eloquent Mr Lee. But when the subject turned to the moral underpinnings of democracy — freedoms of speech, assembly and association — the debate went game, set and match toMr Chee.” In her letter, Mdm Yeong noted thatthe Chees had failed “to produce credibledefence or evidence to back up their claims”. She added: “Having lost, Dr Chee in open court then called the Singapore leaders ‘murderers, robbers, child molesters’ and ‘rapists’. The Chees also rebuked the judge, ignored her orders and shouted her down.” Mdm Yeong’s letter prompted Dr Chee to pen his own response. In a letter to the WSJ — which was also posted on his party’s website — Dr Chee challenged her statement that he had called the Singapore leaders by such names. “The outrageousness of Mdm Yeong’s lie borders on the comedic. Mr Lee Kuan Yew, or his counsel, is in possession of court transcripts and audio-recordings that would show whether I had uttered those words. He must now produce the part of the transcript that quotes me saying those words or he risks destroying his own credibility,” Dr Chee wrote. The WSJ editorial had also said that since the MM Lee–Dr Chee exchange took place in a courtroom, the dialogue is “therefore privileged — which means we can report it without risking a lawsuit, which Mr Lee often files against critics”. However, Mdm Yeong noted that “many opposition politicians routinely criticise government leaders, but they are not sued because they have not uttered slanderous falsehoods”. “Contrary to your editorial, Singapore upholds free speech and the right to disagree, subject to the law,” Mdm Yeong said in her letter.MM’s press sec responds to WSJ editorial on Chees’ caseTHE libel case against Dr Chee Soon Juan and his sister had nothing to do with political freedom in Singapore. Instead, “it was for defamation arising from the Chees’ false claims” that Prime Minister Lee Hsien Loong and Minister Mentor Lee Kuan Yew “are criminaland corrupt”. These were among the points raised by Madam Yeong Yoon Ying, press secretary to MM Lee, in her letter to the Asian edition of the Wall Street Journal (WSJ). Mdm Yeong was responding to the newspaper’s editorial titled Democracy in Singapore, which was :published yesterday. “Your editorial ... relying on a ‘partial transcript’, has misunderstood the issue in the libel case involving Dr Chee Soon Juan and his sister,” Mdm Yeong said. In its editorial last Thursday, the newspaper had offered its readers a glimpse of what it described as a “David-vs-Goliath exchange” between Dr Chee, the head of the Singapore Democratic Party (SDP), and MM Lee during last month’s court hearing to assess damages arising from the defamation suit. In 2006, the Chees lost the suit brought by PM Lee and MM Lee over an articleDr Chee had published in the SDP newsletter, which drew parallels between governance in the old National Kidney Foundation and the Singapore Government. Referring to a partial transcript of the courtroom exchange between MM Lee and Dr Chee, the editorial noted: “Mr Chee is no orator, and on one level the dissident was no match for the eloquent Mr Lee. But when the subject turned to the moral underpinnings of democracy — freedoms of speech, assembly and association — the debate went game, set and match toMr Chee.” In her letter, Mdm Yeong noted thatthe Chees had failed “to produce credibledefence or evidence to back up their claims”. She added: “Having lost, Dr Chee in open court then called the Singapore leaders ‘murderers, robbers, child molesters’ and ‘rapists’. The Chees also rebuked the judge, ignored her orders and shouted her down.” Mdm Yeong’s letter prompted Dr Chee to pen his own response. In a letter to the WSJ — which was also posted on his party’s website — Dr Chee challenged her statement that he had called the Singapore leaders by such names. “The outrageousness of Mdm Yeong’s lie borders on the comedic. Mr Lee Kuan Yew, or his counsel, is in possession of court transcripts and audio-recordings that would show whether I had uttered those words. He must now produce the part of the transcript that quotes me saying those words or he risks destroying his own credibility,” Dr Chee wrote. The WSJ editorial had also said that since the MM Lee–Dr Chee exchange took place in a courtroom, the dialogue is “therefore privileged — which means we can report it without risking a lawsuit, which Mr Lee often files against critics”. However, Mdm Yeong noted that “many opposition politicians routinely criticise government leaders, but they are not sued because they have not uttered slanderous falsehoods”. “Contrary to your editorial, Singapore upholds free speech and the right to disagree, subject to the law,” Mdm Yeong said in her letter.
-
Stop the despots cutting Silliporeans wages! Support people the despots are persecuting!
-
Originally posted by yamizi:
Wow...I just realise both eagle and MW your post are over 10k leh...
Ur mean summation or individual posts?? Mine is not even 100...hee
-
Originally posted by Mostwanted5125:
Ur mean summation or individual posts?? Mine is not even 100...hee
I think he wants to say Andrew lah...
-
Originally posted by Mostwanted5125:
Ur mean summation or individual posts?? Mine is not even 100...hee
Whose clone are you? hahaha are you the panty sniffer?
-
Originally posted by AndrewPKYap:
Stop the despots cutting Silliporeans wages! Support people the despots are persecuting!
Oh man...u really need to visit a shrink.....PAP will jump in joy if all opposition are like ur kind....very easy to sue to earn some cash.....
-
Originally posted by AndrewPKYap:
Animals do not understand the concepts of justice, free speech and other human constructs. It is not surprising that you cannot as well.
You can't define justice, you even assuming all Singaporeans to be silliporeans, how humane are you?
-
Originally posted by AndrewPKYap:
Whose clone are you? hahaha are you the panty sniffer?
He's not...
I can vouch for that, although he's new.
He's a very zai physics person. Comparing him with that panty sniffer is an extreme insult to him.
-
Originally posted by Mostwanted5125:
Oh man...u really need to visit a shrink.....PAP will jump in joy if all opposition are like ur kind....very easy to sue to earn some cash.....
...for pointing put that you are a clone and very likely the panty-sniffer????!!!! hahahaha...
-
Originally posted by AndrewPKYap:
Whose clone are you? hahaha are you the panty sniffer?
Wow...and I thought u ARE in the same league as the panty sniffer??? illogical and cranky...
-
Originally posted by yamizi:
You can't define justice, you even assuming all Singaporeans to be silliporeans, how humane are you?
Since you acknowledged that you are no more than an animal, how can you know what being a human is like?
-
Originally posted by AndrewPKYap:
...for pointing put that you are a clone and very likely the panty-sniffer????!!!! hahahaha...
Ya ya...all new comers that goes against u are clone...all new comers that goes against u are panty sniffer....
Continue this and one day u be no different from some typical MIW...
-
Originally posted by Mostwanted5125:
Wow...and I thought u ARE in the same league as the panty sniffer??? illogical and cranky...
Less than 100 posts, the evidence suggests that you are indeed panty sniffer.
-
Originally posted by AndrewPKYap:
Less than 100 posts, the evidence suggests that you are indeed panty sniffer.
Rather if u join sg forum in AUG and have more than 100 posts in a week time....this is even more suggestive that this kind of person is either panty sniffer or Andrew clone....
Posting all kind of nonsense....and arguing for the sake of arguing....