Rollin' good times over
-
Ahhh... it is also about money since their ideology on economy r different.
-
Originally posted by stupidissmart:
If u ask me, the real criteria is simply... making good judgement in the end.
this is overly simplistic, i am afraid.
one's decision is based on the objective(s) in mind. if mugabe's objective is to pillage and rape the country's wealth for his own gain, he will also be making a lot of `good judgement' to meet his motives.
the deeper truth is, what is the right thing to do?
-
I suppose the soldiers of Georgia and Russia are fighting because of money?
-
Well, tat will depend on wat "good" is about.
If u ask me, to make the economy of the country better and the people imbued with more material benefit is wat "good" is all about.
However it is not wrong to state tat tis "good" can be subjective. However in a world, sometimes it is better for an economist to run the country than a person who do charity regularly. And sometimes tis economist doesn't necessary like to work for "peanuts"
-
i suppose the soldiers of Georgia and Russia are fighting because of money?
The russian and gerogia soldiers r there because it is their career.
-
Originally posted by stupidissmart:
The russian and gerogia soldiers r there because it is their career.
Oh!!!The Russian and Georgian soldiers are fighting because of their career.
That's a good one.
-
They r paid to do tis. It is their job. Yes or no ?
-
Originally posted by stupidissmart:
They r paid to do tis. It is their job. Yes or no ?
You mean if there is no money paid, they won't fight for their homeland?Say the enemy offer them more money, does it mean they are going to fight for the enemy against the homeland?
-
You mean if there is no money paid, they won't fight for their homeland?
Say the enemy offer them more money, does it mean they are going to fight for the enemy against the homeland?
If there is no money involved, they wouldn't even be trained in the first place.
If the enemy offers more money, they wouldn't change loyalty. However money is indeed involved tat transform a soldier from a civilian. U need to see the original statment I made
most soldiers in the world r soldiers because of the money.
They choose to be soldier because it is a career for them. Tat doesn't mean they will change loyalty for money
-
Originally posted by stupidissmart:
If there is no money involved, they wouldn't even be trained in the first place.
If the enemy offers more money, they wouldn't change loyalty. However money is indeed involved tat transform a soldier from a civilian. U need to see the original statment I made
most soldiers in the world r soldiers because of the money.
They choose to be soldier because it is a career for them. Tat doesn't mean they will change loyalty for money
So they joined the army for money?When they are fighting a war, it's also because of money?
So what if the army doesn't give them money or the enemy gives them more money?
Seriously, any country with soldiers fighting for money instead of patriotism would fail.
-
I am saying soldiers is a career tat give pay to the people. Tis pay really change people from civilian to soldier. I am not saying they r mercenaries and change loyalty based on the money to be earned but I am saying people become soldiers for money. These 2 r different issues. If there is no money and no career involved, then u will see a severe drop in the number of soldiers in all countries.
-
Originally posted by stupidissmart:
I am saying soldiers is a career tat give pay to the people. Tis pay really change people from civilian to soldier. I am not saying they r mercenaries and change loyalty based on the money to be earned but I am saying people become soldiers for money. These 2 r different issues. If there is no money and no career involved, then u will see a severe drop in the number of soldiers in all countries.
Didn't you say?And regardless of wat u say, most soldiers in the world r soldiers because of the money.
-
yes. They become soldiers because it is a career. I did not say soldiers switch allegiance because of money. If there is no money involved to be a soldier, i can see a high percentage drop of people being soldiers
-
Originally posted by stupidissmart:
yes. They become soldiers because it is a career. I did not say soldiers switch allegiance because of money. If there is no money involved to be a soldier, i can see a high percentage drop of people being soldiers
ok. -
Originally posted by maurizio13:
ok.
not going anywhere, eh, i see..... -
Originally posted by redDUST:
not going anywhere, eh, i see.....
you get the general idea.