Does this post offend you?
-
Anyway, this thread already shows your limited views. What's more with the statement "written examinations cannot skip questions" -.-"
Seems u want me to carry on. Fine lets play tis game
And I have already told you there's no need to understand fully the modules in NUS to score As for it.
So back to the question you have been avoiding by directing me to your question on the problem being on NUS professors:
Then tat seems to beg the question whether does one need to fully understand the modules in TUD. Furthermore, not all modules in TUD uses oral examination
If u look at TUM
Many examinations are held during the weeks at the end of a semester after lectures have ended. If a test conflicts with your plans to return home, you should request an oral exam from the professor teaching the course. Professors are not obligated to offer an oral test, but if they do it will most probably be to your advantage.
http://portal.mytum.de/studium/bewerbung/incomings/Austauschstudenten/faq/
Wat message r they driving ? Written examination is still the most important part of the curriculum. If they give oral exam, it is because of humane reason like going back home early and it is easier than the written exam. U r lucky TUD website is all german
You stated it. You should prove it. This is your style.
For Germany, I know for a fact that TUD and TUM have oral examinations; that's 2 out of their 5 technical universities. And Germany has a rather high ranking for engineering.
Fact is tat, other than your germany university who do uses oral examination for the some subjects, most university does not. If u ask me for evidence, it will be the absence of information on oral examination from US university and emphasis on oral examination on TUD. MIT only have oral examination for PhD student and so does NTU and NUS. They call tis "defence" of your thesis and not on studying modules
Still acting dumb or what. Haven't I already told you it is for testing of theories and facts?
Maybe because u r limiting in your view and tat is why u fail to realise math can have an oral examination if they want. Furthermore, Maths do have theories involved
Again, I have told you that you will likely get penalised heavily for that. Still missing the point is it?
Why do u think u will not be penalised for leaving a question empty in a written exam ?
Some examples can include doing analysis and giving conclusions, and educating other engineers/people.
U see, u r skipping wat is the main job of an engineering. Doing analysis and giving conclusion is = to providing physical solution. Educating people is not the main job of an engineer and more like a training officer.
Not to mention the fact that you seemed to think that someone graduating with an engineering degree must be an engineer since you appear to be very concerned with the education of engineers in the uni being able to satisfy the "main job" requirements of an engineer.
No, I did not say tat a person with an engineering degree must be an engineer. I am saying an ENGINEER has to provide answer on physical problems.
Lets see the wiki definition of engineer
Engineers are concerned with developing economical and safe solutions to practical problems, by applying mathematics and scientific knowledge while considering technical constraints
-
stupid, if you want to continue to act dumb, feel free to do so.
You have already said it's wasting time to do so. So I'm not going to waste any more time to point out to you your errors, simply because you have not been to Germany and experience their education and thus unable to give an accurate comparison at all.
Society has already proven you to be incapable. Try again when you earn more.
P.S. I know you are very free, because it is, as you said, wasting of time. Yet you like to waste time. Feel free to do so. No more point of me trying to convince a thick skulled person with limited views.
-
Why ? U have proven to be limiting in your thoughts instead ? Your german university example had already stated tat oral examination is easier for u and so wat is your comment on it. Why not start your apology to me for claiming I am limiting in my thoughts before u exit ? Surprisingly as u exit, u can still hurl a verbal abuse over and claiming I am incapble. Is tat all u r good at ? Inflating claims and verbal abuse
-
As I have said
Try again when you earn more. Someone not limited in views wouldn't have told me he's satisfied with $2.5k monthly. You are incapable because society has already told you so.
-
As I have said
Try again when you earn more. Someone not limited in views wouldn't have told me he's satisfied with $2.5k monthly
Why ? People earning lesser necessary means their views r limited ? It seems u r proud to be shallow and gauge people based on their salary
I know you are very free, because it is, as you said, wasting of time. Yet you like to waste time. Feel free to do so. No more point of me trying to convince a thick skulled person with limited views.
It used to be a waste of time until u directly challenged me and hurl a verbal abuse. I chose not to reply then not because I have nothing to say but because I want to focus on the more important topics. However u treat it as a sign of weakness and claimed I am limiting in my view. So now I have replied your post and u r left speechless. Aren't u limiting in your view then ?
-
Originally posted by stupidissmart:
Why ? People earning lesser necessary means their views r limited ? It seems u r proud to be shallow and gauge people based on their salary
Nah
As a NTU engineer, you must really be damn lousy to be earning $2.5k monthly when many others are earning near to $1k more => society's way of showing how incapable you are.
-
As a person in the forum, it is damn stupid of u to believe wat the other person had claimed, especially on their personal life. But tis shows your shallow thinking of listing capability by the salary they earned and I wonder where your compassion flies to when u talk abut the elderly and needy before.
-
Originally posted by stupidissmart:
As a person in the forum, it is damn stupid of u to believe wat the other person had claimed, especially on their personal life. But tis shows your shallow thinking of listing capability by the salary they earned and I wonder where your compassion flies to when u talk abut the elderly and needy before.
Well, you are not the elderly or needy, so there's no need to be compassionate for you if you remain incapable because you refuse to open up your views.
There's nothing wrong with you to accept that $2.5k monthly is enough for you. Really. Being simple minded and easily satisfied makes you a happy man. Good job.
-
Woots ! ... a latest blog post ! .... fresh from the oven ! ...
damm ! ... I love this girl ...
http://theladymelissa.blogspot.com/2008/08/table-tennis-china-team-versus-china.html
-
Well, you are not the elderly or needy, so there's no need to be compassionate for you if you remain incapable because you refuse to open up your views.
Why don't u look at your original statement
Try again when you earn more. Someone not limited in views wouldn't have told me he's satisfied with $2.5k monthly. You are incapable because society has already told you so.
According to the above, anybody earning less than 2.5 k is deemed to be incapable to u. So all the old folks who is needy r probably worthless to u then. Makes me wonder wat sort of shallow hypocrite u r
There's nothing wrong with you to accept that $2.5k monthly is enough for you. Really. Being simple minded and easily satisfied makes you a happy man. Good job.
Seems u have a problem with comprehension. I already stated only stupid people will believe wat the other people claimed in forums, especially on their personal life. Then u repeat yourself to be stupid by repeating a claim I made before on me. Seems u r satisfied in proving yourself to be dumb
-
It doesn't matter what you say. To me, you are already incapable.
So either you are telling lies all along in the forum, or you are stating the truth. Choose one.
So stupid, if you claim that local unis are so good, take out your certs from your NTU and show me that you are indeed capable.
Somehow you have selective reading disorder. I have already said you are not the old folk or the needy. Is there any reason why you still want to compare yourself with them?
And read carefully. I'm talking about NTU engineers earning < $2.5k. Not anyone else.
Finally, your disorder limits you again. I mentioned being satisfied with <$2.5k in the statement you quoted, not earning.
-
Originally posted by JoshuaSamuel:
From : http://theladymelissa.blogspot.com/2...graduates.html
I would suggest that anyone reading this post also take a look at the very vibrant comment page.
Village Graduates
I have been engaging a half-educated person in a semblance of intellectual debate under the comment pages of "A Good Christian Girl" and "A Refutation of Sorts".
As everyone knows, I did not go to a local university; whenever I come into contact with a local graduate, their intellectual paucity always astounds me .
The worse people to debate with are the badly educated. The uneducated are easy to dismiss. The well-educated are a joy to debate with, even if sometimes disagreements can get quite heated - you nevertheless go away mentally stimulated and satisfied. The badly educated on the other hand (like this person who more or less admitted to be an NUS Arts and Social Science graduate) are painful to debate with.
These people have read the right books, memorised the right key words and phrases, but have no real understanding of the issues. Worse, they lack to intellect to analyse these topics properly. In these cases, what happens is that you get verbal diarrhoea spewed at you and you don't even know where to begin to argue back, because even though all the paragraphs are correctly stringed together, the sentences are grammatical, the spelling is almost always right, the right names and phrases are dropped, BUT the person does not make any sense. This leaves you intellectually frustrated because unlike uneducated people, you have to unteach before you teach. It's like a gadfly, albeit without the intelligence of Socrates, which you have to swat away, because this person talks your language ostensibly, and you feel a compulsion to correct her.
The local universities cannot be good until the government stops sending the brightest overseas on scholarships; however, the local universities will fail to attract them until they can draw the best thinkers and dons on all levels, rather than second-rate teachers from India and China. It is a vicious cycle and until this cycle is broken, local university undergraduates (with the exception of Law and Medicine) will always be second-rate, so much so that some foreign (mainland Chinese) undergraduates have said that Singaporeans are stupid. If their experience is only at the local universities, it is no wonder they say that, since our most brilliant have all gone overseas to Oxbridge and the Ivies, Stanford or MIT. What these mainland Chinese have not experienced are these students who have not only gone to the best universities in the world, but consistently top these universities. I honestly think that the mainland Chinese and Indians who top NUS/NTU/SMU would be easily trounced if they came up against our true best and brightest.
Singapore needs to put more resources into universities if it wants to be taken seriously as a First World Nation. The vicious cycle needs to be broken somewhere - they need to hire the best professors and get some of the brightest to stay at home. These may lead to fewer places at the local universities so some people will not qualify. But some people don't belong at universities - they would probably serve society better by getting technical proficiency at a polytechnic, then joining the workforce.
Afterall, it's better to be a non-graduate than a half-educated village graduatewhy bother to post such long-winded vomit here. just let her live in her gilded cage.
-
It doesn't matter what you say. To me, you are already incapable.
And sad to say u r worse than incapable by being pwned over in tis thread
So either you are telling lies all along in the forum, or you are stating the truth. Choose one.
Well either u r dumb to believe everything a person had said about himself in forum or u r stupid enough to quote out facts which u cannot verify. Choose one.
U know I am already used to your dumb approach in debating
So stupid, if you claim that local unis are so good, take out your certs from your NTU and show me that you are indeed capable.
If i got hookwinked by such a stupid trick to show my NTU cert, then I must really be incapable. One one hand u believe I am from NTU then on the other hand u doubt it. Wat happened to u ? Mad or something ?
Somehow you have selective reading disorder. I have already said you are not the old folk or the needy. Is there any reason why you still want to compare yourself with them?
U appear to be the one with the reading disorder. I have already quoted your passage claiming all those people earning less than 2.5 k to be incapable. Tis group of people include the old and needy which u earlier try to defend before. So wat is your answer to tat hypocrite ? Read carefully too. Your earliest claim DO NOT include NTU in it
-
And sad to say u r worse than incapable by being pwned over in tis thread
An admission that you are merely looking for pwning (even though you have not at all) and totally not interested in discussions.
No difference from Gazelle.
Try again, stupid. You quoted this.
Try again when you earn more. Someone not limited in views wouldn't have told me he's satisfied with $2.5k monthly. You are incapable because society has already told you so
And I have told you after that this is not for the old and needy. Also, you are claiming
I have already quoted your passage claiming all those people earning less than 2.5 k to be incapable
Hypocrite? More like you like to read things wrongly.
Why don't I do an easier task by showing capable people with NTU certs which u can verify. Do u think NTU never generate any capable people ? Tat is really limiting in your thoughts
Again, selective reading disorder. Where have I said that NTU never generate any capable people? I'm saying that you are really incapable to be an NTU engineer earning $2.5k monthly
Your earliest claim DO NOT include NTU in it
So you are telling me you are limiting yourself only to the earliest claim? An admission that you are indeed limiting in your views?
-
Try again when you earn more. Someone not limited in views wouldn't have told me he's satisfied with $2.5k monthly. You are incapable because society has already told you so
Yes I read carefully and it still mean
If u r satisfied with 2.5k monthly, then u r incapable because society has told u so.
Then I extrapolate to the old and needy who earns lesser than tat and shows tat u r despising them to be incapable as well. I am pretty sure the old and needy people r not earning 2.5 k a month
Again, selective reading disorder. Where have I said that NTU never generate any capable people? I'm saying that you are really incapable to be an NTU engineer earning $2.5k monthly
Well then it is time for u to read back the earlier reply again. I have changed it before u reply to tis one
So you are telling me you are limiting yourself only to the earliest claim? An admission that you are indeed limiting in your views?
The topic is on the earliest statement and your second statement is trying to drag u out of the sh!t. Too bad the second statement is not gonna overwrite your earliest statement u made previously
-
Originally posted by stupidissmart:
Yes I read carefully and it still mean
If u r satisfied with 2.5k monthly, then u r incapable because society has told u so.
Then I extrapolate to the old and needy who earns lesser than tat and shows tat u r despising them to be incapable as well. I am pretty sure the old and needy people r not earning 2.5 k a month
Well then it is time for u to read back the earlier reply again
Then I extrapolate to the old and needy who earns lesser than tat and shows tat u r despising them to be incapable as well. I am pretty sure the old and needy people r not earning 2.5 k a month
Thanks again for admitting that you do indeed like to read things selectively.
Well then it is time for u to read back the earlier reply again
Again, the same admission to limitations of your vision.
The topic is on the earliest statement and your second statement is trying to drag u out of the sh!t. Too bad the second statement is not gonna overwrite your earliest statement u made previously
Well, if you can understand the first statement, don't tell me you are that stupid not to understand that the statement is for clarifications because of your selective reading and extrapolations. Try again.
-
Thanks again for admitting that you do indeed like to read things selectively
Your earlier statement do label people who r satisfied with a lesser than 2.5k salary to be incapable. The extrapolation is valid. If u wanna claim I read things selectively, u have to prove tat u do not mean the abovementioned
Well, if you can understand the first statement, don't tell me you are that stupid not to understand that the statement is for clarifications because of your selective reading and extrapolations. Try again.
So u r trying to say u want to eat back your own words u had stated before and try to re-establish the message u r getting through ?
Just a quesion, where on earth do u get the idea I get only 2.5K a month ?
-
Originally posted by stupidissmart:
Your earlier statement do label people who r satisfied with a lesser than 2.5k salary to be incapable. The extrapolation is valid. If u wanna claim I read things selectively, u have to prove tat u do not mean the abovementioned
Well, because you extrapolated, I have clarified with you.
Any reason why you would want to continuously go back to the first statement even after clarifications?
So u r trying to say u want to eat back your own words u had stated before and try to re-establish the message u r getting through ?
There's no eating back of words. You had extrapolated, I clarified. Nowhere did I mention the old and needy before you do.
Just a quesion, where on earth do u get the idea I get only 2.5K a month ?
You mentioned it in another thread. I'm lazy to dig out what you have told me earlier.
-
Tel me first. Where do u get the idea I am earning less than 2.5K a month ? If my memory serves me correct, I never stated I earn 2.5k a month. Since u claim it, u have to prove it
-
I looked back and saw that you have changed it to 3000 a month -- apologies on the number. That's more normal.
Still, you are the one who said you are one that is "resigned by fate and circumstances". I shall assume you are still young, not old or needy.
-
Com'on... I did not change the figure to become 3000. It is all along 3000 and your memory had failed u. Even in your own reply u have quoted it as 3000. So now since u realised tat my take home pay is 3000 and u deemed me to be an NTU engineer graduate, then r u gonna claim I am incapable ? If I am incapable, then tons of people out there r incapable as well. So wat is your stand on "incapable" and "lousy" ? U wanna eat back all those words now ?
-
Well, there's no proof if you have changed it before, because there's clearly an edited post message 11 mins after you posted.
3000 a month is still on the lower end. Which means going back to my earlier statement, it means many are earning $500 more.
You are still incapable and lousy because you are easily "resigned by fate and circumstances".
-
Well, there's no proof if you have changed it before, because there's clearly an edited post message 11 mins after you posted.
Tis is from your reply, on the thread 1st world country, 3rd world situation, Uniquely Singapore, page 5, 22 Jul 11: 10 written by eagle. At the very last line
It must have costed you a big bomb if you have been around Europe, having claimed you earned <3k a month.
Now who had changed the post before ? It is all the while 3000.
3000 a month is still on the lower end. Which means going back to my earlier statement, it means many are earning $500 more.
Now tat is my take home pay. If u add in CPF contribution it is 3600 a month. I find tat a reasonable amount for an engineer and there r many people similar or worse off than me. So u r gonna classify them as incapable or lousy ? Wat happened to your earlier statement of
Try again when you earn more. Someone not limited in views wouldn't have told me he's satisfied with $2.5k monthly. You are incapable because society has already told you so.
As a NTU engineer, you must really be damn lousy to be earning $2.5k monthly when many others are earning near to $1k more => society's way of showing how incapable you are.
U give a fake figure, play with it and hurl insults over it. Don't u feel u should eat back these words and apologise ?
You are still incapable and lousy because you are easily "resigned by fate and circumstances".
Since u claim the above, then please show me explicitly where did I say "resigned by fate and circumstances". It is on wat issue ?
-
http://politics.sgforums.com/forums/10/topics/324577?page=3
Actually u r pretty right on me being resigned by fate and circumstances
-
Wat is your comment on the other part of your passage ? It seems pretty empty to me.
Now on the statement
Actually u r pretty right on me being resigned by fate and circumstances
Wat is the point u r trying to drive ? Some people r pessimist, some r optimist. Some people view things as realistic and view things as opportunity. Wat right do u have to say people who r more realistic to be "incapable" ? The old and needy folks r probably resigned to their fate and circumstances as well. R u gonna link them to be "incapable" as well ?