Business A, Business B
-
Our government said, they censor the SDP or other oppositition talk or western media news because their news is bad, not real.Only what the government said is real and good.
Let me ask back the PAP government, there are 2 people selling a product, which product is real or not, it's up to the indiviual to listen and think.Businessman A of course will keep telling the people his product is real, same like Businessman B.This is called fair play and also freedom of thought.
What if Business A maybe because he know some government people, and he ask the government to censor what Business B said, or better still arrest him when he wanted to sell his product because he is not saying the real thing while Business A is?
So, now Business A already get rip of his Business B opponent and now he is the king.He now say what he can, and he can even say all his product is good and real.And please don't listen to other Businessman.
The question is, who is the one to judge who is right and wrong?If the government side the Business A because of some political or financial reason, so regarding of Business A good or bad, we had to listen to him?And think that only him is good and other's bad?
Isit good that, we are been told everything that the Business A said is good and real and if whoever want to complete with Business A business, he will be condemn to prison or bankcrupt regardless of the truth?
Do what is right and don't do what is wrong.This is what had been taught in our school all the years.
-
You new in Singapore?
-
Originally posted by Poh Ah Pak:
You new in Singapore?
lol -
Originally posted by Cheowyonglee:
Our government said, they censor the SDP or other oppositition talk or western media news because their news is bad, not real.Only what the government said is real and good.
Let me ask back the PAP government, there are 2 people selling a product, which product is real or not, it's up to the indiviual to listen and think.Businessman A of course will keep telling the people his product is real, same like Businessman B.This is called fair play and also freedom of thought.
What if Business A maybe because he know some government people, and he ask the government to censor what Business B said, or better still arrest him when he wanted to sell his product because he is not saying the real thing while Business A is?
So, now Business A already get rip of his Business B opponent and now he is the king.He now say what he can, and he can even say all his product is good and real.And please don't listen to other Businessman.
The question is, who is the one to judge who is right and wrong?If the government side the Business A because of some political or financial reason, so regarding of Business A good or bad, we had to listen to him?And think that only him is good and other's bad?
Isit good that, we are been told everything that the Business A said is good and real and if whoever want to complete with Business A business, he will be condemn to prison or bankcrupt regardless of the truth?
Do what is right and don't do what is wrong.This is what had been taught in our school all the years.
Yeaa the root of the problem is that the government has unlimited power
Notice that our 'education' also never consisted of individual rights because once everyone is taught that the very structure of this totalitarian state will fall apart
-
scenario 2
You got into legal trouble with your wife. A lawyer ask you to do this, but another weird guy comes in and tell you to do that. who do you choose?
Conversely, if 2 lawyers have differing views, than you will have to judge who is correct.
but let's say one of the lawyer, A, decide to slander the other lawyer, B, in order to gain an advantage. than lawyer B has the right to sue A.
-
Originally posted by Poh Ah Pak:
You new in Singapore?
He must be. After all, everyone knows how media censorship in our country is.
-
Originally posted by Poh Ah Pak:
You new in Singapore?
same sentiments here
lol
-
Even she knows the sh!t we face here:
U.S. Department of State Country Reports on Human Rights Practices - 2007 (Singapore)
The government has broad powers to limit citizens' rights and to handicap political opposition, which it used.
...preventive detention, executive influence over the judiciary, infringement of citizens' privacy rights, restriction of speech and press freedom and the practice of self-censorship by journalists, restriction of freedom of assembly and association, limited restriction of freedom of religion, and some trafficking in persons.
-
Originally posted by AndrewPKYap:
Even she knows the sh!t we face here:
U.S. Department of State Country Reports on Human Rights Practices - 2007 (Singapore)
The government has broad powers to limit citizens' rights and to handicap political opposition, which it used.
...preventive detention, executive influence over the judiciary, infringement of citizens' privacy rights, restriction of speech and press freedom and the practice of self-censorship by journalists, restriction of freedom of assembly and association, limited restriction of freedom of religion, and some trafficking in persons.
I like the face.