USA has plundered world wealth with dollar: China paper
-
Originally posted by AndrewPKYap:
Don't disgrace the Japanese by comparing them with dishonorable despots/despot.
Do they have a Sick Manic and a Moronic Manic despots in the cabinet?
Do they have an assson unwilling to relinguish power even when he had cancer and his cancer cells probably making a come back soon or they they have honorable prime ministers willing to step down if they are unpopular.
Here the people curse them to the third generation and they still cling on like the asspotic despots that they are.
As much as I dislike the PAP now I still think they could beat any Japanese political party hands down.Not disgracing anyone but this is a fact and so after 20 years you can see for yourself how the Japanese would have evolved backwards while SIngapore hentak kaki>LOL
-
Personally, i think one of the greatest asset PAP have is THick Skin, they seem not bother by shame and lost, unlike other countries, when certain ministry failed in their project or assignment, the Minister resigned and bow out. But here, die die also hold on to the pole.
-
Originally posted by angel7030:
Personally, i think one of the greatest asset PAP have is THick Skin, they seem not bother by shame and lost, unlike other countries, when certain ministry failed in their project or assignment, the Minister resigned and bow out. But here, die die also hold on to the pole.
when u go to bus rightif u dun hold on to the rail
you also will fall mah
so in life must hold on one mah
-
Originally posted by noahnoah:
when u go to bus rightif u dun hold on to the rail
you also will fall mah
so in life must hold on one mah
For goodness sake, i dun bus or mrt ok. And i only hold on to a pole when i need to do the pole dancing in my pub because the bloody stupid Jeffrey's agency models didn't turn up. !!!! -
From the CIA's website
Japan's external debt: $1.547 Trillion (30 June 2006)
Singapore's external debt: $24.3 Billion (2006 Est.)For a little sense of perspective
China's external debt: $305.6 Billion (2006 Est.)America's external debt:$10.04 trillion (30 June 2006 est.)
Japan's 40 times as big as Singapore in terms of population, but their external debt is around 70+ times bigger.
As demonstrated by the recent economic crisis, Japan's supposedly "honorable" government is sustained by a false debt pillar. It's how they're sustaining their lifestyle.
The US government may owe the Japanese government money, but the Japanese banks are owing the US banks in turn.
The problems with the anti PAP people in this forum is that they somehow believe immediate removal of the PAP can somehow conjure money out of nowhere.
Well, technically any opposition that takes over can really conjure money and give us a fake impression of an economy boom. But it will only put our next generation in debt. And they will do it to give us a fake impression that they're performing better than the PAP.
-
Originally posted by Stevenson101:Well, technically any opposition that takes over can really conjure money and give us a fake impression of an economy boom. But it will only put our next generation in debt. And they will do it to give us a fake impression that they're performing better than the PAP.
if they could do that they would have gotten into the parliament in larger numbers already
-
Originally posted by Short Ninja:
As much as I dislike the PAP now I still think they could beat any Japanese political party hands down.Not disgracing anyone but this is a fact and so after 20 years you can see for yourself how the Japanese would have evolved backwards while SIngapore hentak kaki>LOL
hahaha you are so steep into the propaganda I have to say to you, "live in reality and give up your delusions".
World's biggest economy, ranking (wiki):
2 
Japan4,381,576
A country technically at war:
43 
Israel164,103
45 
Singapore161,349
You let the old dying dishonorable despot run Japan and it would rank near the bottom (while his relatives and cronies rank near the top of being paid with public money)
-
Originally posted by AndrewPKYap:
hahaha you are so steep into the propaganda I have to say to you, "live in reality and give up your delusions".
World's biggest economy, ranking (wiki):
2
Japan4,381,576
A country technically at war:
43
Israel164,103
45
Singapore161,349
You let the old dying dishonorable despot run Japan and it would rank near the bottom (while his relatives and cronies rank near the top of being paid with public money)
Your friend Wiki is unreliable
-
You let the old dying dishonorable despot run Japan and it would rank near the bottom (while his relatives and cronies rank near the top of being paid with public money)
Considering what we've learnt from Lehman Brothers' bankruptcy, i would have thought it would be obvious the size of the economy means squat because the debts of the economy isn't factored in.
It's like i've got a 15 million dollars freehold terrace house property but every cent i used to pay for it is borrowed. And worse, i continued to borrow in order to pay for the upkeep of the terrace house.
America's world biggest economy is built on the muscle of their military and laid on top on their mountain of debt.
if they could do that they would have gotten into the parliament in larger numbers already
That is partly the reason why i'm apprehensive about the opposition taking over and especially worried about a sudden landslide winning of the opposition.
The lack of their numbers in parliament could be explained by the PAP government's way of dealing with dissidents.
The underdog suddenly has the abillity to call the shots, to dictate policy and they would be extremely eager to prove that they're better than the PAP. They need to consolidate power and get the buraecracy to listen to them. They need a lot of money to do that and their party members don't have that kind of dough to do it.
Where are they going to get the money then?
-
Originally posted by Stevenson101:
That is partly the reason why i'm apprehensive about the opposition taking over and especially worried about a sudden landslide winning of the opposition.
The lack of their numbers in parliament could be explained by the PAP government's way of dealing with dissidents.
The underdog suddenly has the abillity to call the shots, to dictate policy and they would be extremely eager to prove that they're better than the PAP. They need to consolidate power and get the buraecracy to listen to them. They need a lot of money to do that and their party members don't have that kind of dough to do it.
Where are they going to get the money then?
i was actually thought about that sometime back, going by what we can already see, what if all those "unproven rumors" suddenly turn real.
if sg's lost a lot of money somewhere, its not likely the new guy can balance everything, and what are they going to do? openly lay out everything using it to condemn PAP to consolidate their own political position while scaring away investors from sg at the same time? or cover it up and follow in PAP's footsteps instead of making changes?
being voted in because of people's dislike of PAP and not because of trust they'll do well, would they have the capability to control the bureaucracy? they can't even expand out of their own sphere of influence right now.
-
They need to consolidate power and get the buraecracy to listen to them. They need a lot of money to do that and their party members don't have that kind of dough to do it.
Where are they going to get the money then?
That seems like fallacy.
-
China, Russia renounce the dollar?
http://en.rian.ru/analysis/2008
New order needed to meet global challenges
http://www.chinadaily.com.cn/opinion
Putin: We must end monopoly in world finance
http://www.russiatoday.com/news/
The World Tires of Dollar Hegemony
-
Originally posted by Poh Ah Pak:
China, Russia renounce the dollar?
http://en.rian.ru/analysis/2008
New order needed to meet global challenges
http://www.chinadaily.com.cn/opinion
Putin: We must end monopoly in world finance
http://www.russiatoday.com/news/
The World Tires of Dollar Hegemony
chen ni bing yao ni de ming?
-
Originally posted by Short Ninja:
Your friend Wiki is unreliable
I said Japan is number 2 economy in the world and quoted Wiki and you say "Wiki is unreliable"? Wiki is unreliable? You doubt Japan is number 2?
hahahahahahahahahahahahahahahaha!!!!!!! Idiot alert!
-
S.Korea is gonna go bust soon. LoL
what else.. ;p
-
Originally posted by AndrewPKYap:
I said Japan is number 2 economy in the world and quoted Wiki and you say "Wiki is unreliable"? Wiki is unreliable? You doubt Japan is number 2?
hahahahahahahahahahahahahahahaha!!!!!!! Idiot alert!
wikipedia is unreliable and japan is the 2nd largest economy but only if you're considering individual countries.
-
Originally posted by AndrewPKYap:
hahaha you are so steep into the propaganda I have to say to you, "live in reality and give up your delusions".
World's biggest economy, ranking (wiki):
2
Japan4,381,576
A country technically at war:
43
Israel164,103
45
Singapore161,349
You let the old dying dishonorable despot run Japan and it would rank near the bottom (while his relatives and cronies rank near the top of being paid with public money)
Ok ok I get u.... Let me summarise ur point in a neat mathematical manner.
This is what PKYAP means in a precise manner....
Let G={ the set of lousiest governments in the world}
PAP(as Spore ruling party) = infimum of G
-
Originally posted by AndrewPKYap:
hahaha you are so steep into the propaganda I have to say to you, "live in reality and give up your delusions".
World's biggest economy, ranking (wiki):
2
Japan4,381,576
A country technically at war:
43
Israel164,103
45
Singapore161,349
You let the old dying dishonorable despot run Japan and it would rank near the bottom (while his relatives and cronies rank near the top of being paid with public money)
Japan is a much bigger country than Singapore.
Take into account the GDP per CAPITA and compare again.
-
Originally posted by SexyChin:
Japan is a much bigger country than Singapore.
Take into account the GDP per CAPITA and compare again.
You have no idea what we are talking about do you?
-
Originally posted by AndrewPKYap:
You have no idea what we are talking about do you?
Should be "you have no idea what I am talking about do you?"
-
Originally posted by Stevenson101:
From the CIA's website
Japan's external debt: $1.547 Trillion (30 June 2006)
Singapore's external debt: $24.3 Billion (2006 Est.)For a little sense of perspective
China's external debt: $305.6 Billion (2006 Est.)America's external debt:$10.04 trillion (30 June 2006 est.)
Japan's 40 times as big as Singapore in terms of population, but their external debt is around 70+ times bigger.
As demonstrated by the recent economic crisis, Japan's supposedly "honorable" government is sustained by a false debt pillar. It's how they're sustaining their lifestyle.
The US government may owe the Japanese government money, but the Japanese banks are owing the US banks in turn.
The problems with the anti PAP people in this forum is that they somehow believe immediate removal of the PAP can somehow conjure money out of nowhere.
Well, technically any opposition that takes over can really conjure money and give us a fake impression of an economy boom. But it will only put our next generation in debt. And they will do it to give us a fake impression that they're performing better than the PAP.
Some Japanese now realise that they're paying the price for not being interested in politics.
Same situation here. By the time that Singapore's situation is so dire that when the successors to PAP take over, their tasks will be to look into wyas to reduce the public debts. They can do nothing else.
-
Originally posted by AndrewPKYap:
You have no idea what we are talking about do you?
Point it out won't you?
-
Originally posted by SexyChin:
Point it out won't you?
He will do that....if u allow him to touch ur sexy chin!!
-
Originally posted by AndrewPKYap:
You have no idea what we are talking about do you?
who's we? you seem to be quite alone in here
-
It is almost laughable to see the theory that a greater opposition in Singspore will be the magical pill that solves majority of the political problems we have.
Many must know that a greater opposition presence will not necessarily mean a better life or a better run cabinet. This is the biggest fallacy underlying most of the ardent supporters of PAP-removal here.
The illusion of being able to replace a 'corrupt regime run by an old, dying despot' with another 'party run by a victimised man who has great vision' smacks of delusion.
We know that power corrupts. A regime change is not a sure way to improve lives.
That delusion of some forumites here, coupled together with the delusion of the current ruling party, is akin to a blind complaining that the blind leading him can't see what's ahead of him clearly and it should be his turn to lead.
The irony is really laughable.
Fools, both sides are.
