'Change must come' to PAP
-
Pui.
Fucking PAP fucking propaganda.
Want me to vote for you PAP?
If gold fall from the sky, then I might consider voting for fucking PAP.
Otherwise, if gold does not fucking fall from sky, then I think PAP better go fuck off.
PAP no longer vigourous they say.
Take for granted their 50 year rule.
Very well, we must teach them a fucking lesson in next elections like Malaysia that they will never fucking forget.
Like that sure wake up, sure got vigour.
Right or not Lee Kuan Yew?
You fucking bastard.
-
You are lucky PAP.
Majority of voters are not like me.
If majority of voters like me, don't know where the fuck you are already.
Still can control media spread fucking party propaganda.
I think PAP if you want to keep winning elections, you better increase the fucking propaganda in the media.
You must increase the brainwashing and the depoliticisation of the public.
Now after the financial crisis, people see the way you handle it they also start to have doubts already about PAP.
I think you must start bombard people with propaganda about next elections already, otherwise got too many people pissed.
-
But while the US is a big country with a big pool from which to find political talent, there is no such guarantee in smaller places, he said.
'In Asia, it very seldom works because having two or more parties has not guaranteed good governance or progress,' he added, citing Taiwan as an example.
In the last decade, its unhappy voters had swung from the Kuomintang (KMT), to the Democratic Progressive Party, and back to KMT again.
'By Western definitions of democracy, Taiwan qualifies because it's got two changes of government - in, out, in.
'But it is not a political system which is working properly. And I don't think you want that kind of political system in Singapore,' he said.
Yes, that is correct.
But you must repeat.
Say one time people won't listen, cannot be brainwashed.
Want to spread propaganda, you must repeat and repeat and repeat.
That is the right way.
Want to spread propaganda, you must repeat and repeat and repeat.
That is the right way.
Want to spread propaganda, you must repeat and repeat and repeat.
That is the right way.
But while the US is a big country with a big pool from which to find political talent, there is no such guarantee in smaller places, he said.
'In Asia, it very seldom works because having two or more parties has not guaranteed good governance or progress,' he added, citing Taiwan as an example.
In the last decade, its unhappy voters had swung from the Kuomintang (KMT), to the Democratic Progressive Party, and back to KMT again.
'By Western definitions of democracy, Taiwan qualifies because it's got two changes of government - in, out, in.
'But it is not a political system which is working properly. And I don't think you want that kind of political system in Singapore,' he said.
-
Originally posted by AndrewPKYap:
It is likely the chemo had altered his DNA and he is more animal than human. Looks like people suffering from a serious illness like cancer do not automatically make them wiser, at least not in this case.
I have witnessed change for the better from those ex cancer patients who recovered but not this lee hsien loong. He has gotten worst, not worse, but worst. He is the only cancer patient who recovered but refuse to change for the better. -
Originally posted by Poh Ah Pak:
You are lucky PAP.
Majority of voters are not like me.
If majority of voters like me, don't know where the fuck you are already.
Still can control media spread fucking party propaganda.
I think PAP if you want to keep winning elections, you better increase the fucking propaganda in the media.
You must increase the brainwashing and the depoliticisation of the public.
Now after the financial crisis, people see the way you handle it they also start to have doubts already about PAP.
I think you must start bombard people with propaganda about next elections already, otherwise got too many people pissed.
Poh, we have to continue to do our part to expose the regime to both foreigners and locals. Never give up any chance of exposing the Pay N Pay.
-
Poh, we have to continue to do our part to expose the regime to both foreigners and locals. Never give up any chance of exposing the Pay N Pay.
I think PAP are worried about next general elections, they are increasing their propaganda work on this in the state media.
If PAP is starting their propaganda activites now for the next general elections, opposition should also begin their propagadna work.
I think now is a good time to attack and criticise the PAP.
If Lee Kuan Yew dies, it would be better.
-
1) Mr Lee, who is secretary-general of the PAP, said: 'Change has to take place in Singapore but change must take place not (between parties) but within the PAP.
'As long as the PAP changes itself, and continues to provide clean and good government, and the lives of Singaporeans improve, the country is much better off with one dominant, strong, clean, good party.'
2) 'In Asia, it very seldom works because having two or more parties has not guaranteed good governance or progress,' he added, citing Taiwan as an example.
3) Neither does it mean it is the PAP's job to build up the opposition. 'It's hard enough to find one team to look after the country. How can you find two? As a small country, we must have a first division team, an outstanding group of people who can make up for our many limitations,' he said.
4) The PAP has managed to survive more than 50 years because it kept itself 'vigorous, lean, relevant, able to win elections', adjusting its leadership styles to 'suit new generations of Singaporeans'.
1) Change can never come from within the PAP because of paradigms, this is a forgone conclusion.
2) What makes him think that Taiwan has no good governance? The political debates can get physical in parliament, especially between 2 people who feel strongly about their points. Does Taiwan or Singapore have a higher GDP per Capita? What is the price level in Taiwan (Electricity, Petrol, GST)? On the contrary, it's better to have 2 parties or maybe even multiple parties with balanced power rather than one dominant party to dictate terms for their own personal benefits. Like Durai who had control of his board in NKF, he can decide to increase salaries to the millions at his whims and fancies. It is not the nature of man to be philantrophic in his actions, more so for the members of PAP (how often have we not heard that they are worth multi-millions, then again how many end up as CEOs of large MNCs after retirement from politics, other than the CEOs conferred by PM in GICs and GLCs), if they are not philantrophic, all the more so they will engage in actions that will benefit themselves.
Humans by nature are greedy and selfish, and we should not endeavour these same greedy and selfish beings to control themselves. That's why a balanced opposition is required to keep either parties from being too greedy and selfish, as opposed to the current one party dominance. Asking Durai to self regulate himself, is that even a possibility?
3) Why is it difficult to look for good political candidates? It's because of the old man's way of suppressing opposition in the past, therefore it's hard to find good opposition candidates. Those that join the PAP are folks that wish to reap higher financial rewards, not those that truly wish to do the Singapore citizens good, merely a case of "adverse selection".
4) The PAP survived 50 years by employing scare tactics and media propaganda. The battle wasn't fought on equal footings like other democracies, rather through the employment of manipulative crafts.
-
The party is a bunch of followers.
Even this "change" slogan was copied from obama.
Go figure.
-
Garmen want to change but people dont want to change= SIlliporeans end voting for PAP again and again
-
Originally posted by charlize:
The party is a bunch of followers.
Even this "change" slogan was copied from obama.
Go figure.
Darn!!!
LHY has to do alot of sun tanning to pass off as a nigger.
-
slowly god have shows alot of thing that can't been cover up popups like can't be stop..
-
Originally posted by Poh Ah Pak:
You are lucky PAP.
Majority of voters are not like me.
If majority of voters like me, don't know where the fuck you are already.
Still can control media spread fucking party propaganda.
I think PAP if you want to keep winning elections, you better increase the fucking propaganda in the media.
You must increase the brainwashing and the depoliticisation of the public.
Now after the financial crisis, people see the way you handle it they also start to have doubts already about PAP.
I think you must start bombard people with propaganda about next elections already, otherwise got too many people pissed.
As an adult i can see and make proper judgement. i don't believe in brainwashing and the depoliticisation by the media controller. I knew it happen (propaganda) but as i say, adult know what choice to make. -
Originally posted by maurizio13:
3) Neither does it mean it is the PAP's job to build up the opposition. 'It's hard enough to find one team to look after the country. How can you find two? As a small country, we must have a first division team, an outstanding group of people who can make up for our many limitations,' he said.
cannot be, if its so hard to even find one team how come we have so many ministers for all sorts of positions we've never heard off? he said it himself only outstanding cream of the crop can join but he's got at least 2-3 teams there.
-
When you have no new ideas of your own, the easiest thing to do I guess is to follow and not ask any questions. It's really simple, cognitively it saves us the need to think, it avoids having to feel the anxieties from fear, it fortifies our sense of security.. These are just few of the reasons why people would vote for the PAP en masse. The whole pitch about change through the PAP is an appeal to people who want more choices, yet are unwilling or uncertain about a future that deviates radically from the present course (and then u question what the hell is our present course?). So until there is an alternative which is able to address the above requisites, we will and shall always be a single party entity. We shouldn't bang out assessment of that notion on value judgements such as it's good or bad, that just simplifies the whole issue and opens it up to biases of all kinds. We should be asking ourselves a more general question.. such as with the way we are heading, what would Singapore be like another decade from now, what would our lives be like. If the answer is in the positive, of course uve found ur answer. If it is anything either than that, maybe one has to think abt the issues a little more?
-
Just curse the dishonorable greedy for public money despot to the third generation for persecuting dissdents and opposition and taking massive amounts of public money.
Enough people curse him and we shall see....
-
if curses got use in modern time, then the world will be more chaotic liao. When thou see the word CHANGE must come, it sets My toes laughing. What changes one expect? Change in chinese is pronounced as BIAN. So BIAN what? BIAN LIAN=CHANGE FACE.
Yes CHANGE FACE that is. Hokkien call Bi Been. Our ghamen will only Bi Been with us and press us harder. Change? Bah.
-
Originally posted by TemplarKnight:
if curses got use in modern time, then the world will be more chaotic liao. When thou see the word CHANGE must come, it sets My toes laughing. What changes one expect? Change in chinese is pronounced as BIAN. So BIAN what? BIAN LIAN=CHANGE FACE.
Yes CHANGE FACE that is. Hokkien call Bi Been. Our ghamen will only Bi Been with us and press us harder. Change? Bah.
Chinese said, "change the soup only, but ingredients still the same" -
Originally posted by angel7030:
Chinese said, "change the soup only, but ingredients still the same" -
Originally posted by angel7030:
Chinese said, "change the soup only, but ingredients still the same"People at the top say:
Mee siam, mai hum.
-
Originally posted by charlize:
People at the top say:
Mee siam, mai hum.
this one is ingredients change, soup still the same
-
Originally posted by charlize:
People at the top say:
Mee siam, mai hum.
Elite foodfare at the Istana. -
got foodfare ah? Free one izzit? hahaha... maybe a treat to prata or bryani....