![]() |
The improvement in employment figures mainly resulted from more females who were previously outside the labour force becoming employed. -- PHOTO: BT
|
The job rate for Singapore residents aged 25 to 64 rose to a new high of 77 per cent, from 76.5 per cent a year ago, according to the Singapore Workforce 2008 report released by the Ministry of Manpower's research and statistics department on Friday. The findings were based on a labour force survey conducted in mid-2008.
'The improvement mainly resulted from more females who were previously outside the labour force becoming employed,' said MOM in a statement.
The employment rate for older Singaporeans aged 55 to 64 also rose by another 1 per cent over the year to 57.2 per cent in June, thanks to continuing efforts to enhance the employability of older people.
Reflecting more cautious hiring sentiments amid the economic slowdown, the resident unemployment rate rose from a decade low of 2.4 per cent in December 2007 to 3.1 per cent in June.
Since then, the seasonally adjusted resident unemployment rate rose further to 3.3 per cent in September 2008 amid the economic contraction and continued weakening in economic outlook.
But the jobless rate also went up, after reaching a decade low in the second half of 2007, with the less skilled remaining more vulnerable to unemployment.
The report also shows that the median monthly income for full-time employed residents went up by 11 per cent to $2,590 in 2008, up from the gain of 7.7 per cent in 2007.
After adjusting for higher inflation, the increase in median income was 4.6 per cent compared with 5.5 per cent in 2007.
The income growth in 2008 partly reflects the spillover effect from the strong economic performance last year and the higher proportion of Professional, Managerial, Executive & Technician (PMETs), whose income is typically higher, among employed residents in 2008.
Here are the other key findings of the survey:
More comprehensive data will be published in the Report on Labour Force in Singapore 2008 on Jan 30.
The report is available online on the Ministry of Manpower's website athttp://www.mom.gov.sg/mrsd/publication.
If I am not wrong, I think it means:
Overall, more people in the age group between 25 to 64 are being hired officially, although overall less Singaporean are officially hired.
Which means less very young (ie below 25) or the very old (ie above 65) are working officially.
mostly made up of non- singaporean professionals....
yeah... maybe got take in foreign maids and other bangalas into the headcount.
The definition of resident in the number here is Singapore citizen and PR, I just checked the MOM report.
So who knows, may be more PR are hired and more Singaporean are being fired....
FT become PR and citizens. Home grown citizens no longer in use coz too expensive and need to be burn. Then all the FT become citizens or PRs will vote for Papees also....
wat a good strategy. One end keep the employment rate up and secondly can get enuff votes. really kill many burungs with one batu.
errr.. thought PRs cannot vote...
http://www.elections.gov.sg/voters.html
Then all the FT become citizens or PRs will vote for Papees also....
Originally posted by ArtBoon:errr.. thought PRs cannot vote...
sorry... mistake.... I apologies. I rephrase it to PRs becoming sillyzens.
if you are out of job for more than 6 months you are out of the statistics.
Originally posted by dragg:if you are out of job for more than 6 months you are out of the statistics.
which statistics u talking? Employed or unemployed statistics?
Originally posted by skythewood:so employment rate go up,
jobless rate also go up.can someone decipher this?
Don't read too much into it. Just know that PAP will bring us to a brighter future someday.
Can I say that again,
the employment rate for Citizen is not shown?
Why ?
What is the harm?
Can there be more Transparency pls?
sure, why don't you go and do the research
During boom times, the media will report unemployment rate. eg 1%.
During recessions, the media will report employment rate. eg 90%
See the difference and the psychological effect? ![]()