It is possible that she was shot by the security forces...
"The militant was believed to have been using human shields to taunt and evade Indian security forces and a bag captured from the gunmen revealed a stockpile meant for a long siege: 400 rounds of ammunition, grenades, identity cards, rations, $1,000 (£650) in cash and international credit cards."
Can you imagine her terror, being used as a human shield.
Since they are all holed up in buildings, maybe they should use sleeping gas and move in after the people inside are drowsy.
but.....
"For the hostages, it was the gas which was the big killer - around 113 are thought to have died from its effects."
If I am a hostage, I will rather take my chances with the gas...
My condolences to her family.
Let's not blame the security forces, but hold the terrorists fully accountable.
Under normal hostage situations, where there is negotiations, no body killed yet, security forces would not move in to mount any rescue operations but hope that negotiations work. Rescuing hostages under such circumstances is pure surgical work, and definately not a walk in the park.
However, the attack at Mumbai is entirely different situation. People were already dying on the streets. The terrorists were killing people indiscriminately and lobbing grenades everywhere.
Under such circumstances, the police and security forces definately have to charge and save as many lives as possible. The more they hesitate, the more lives will be lost. They had no choice. Some of the brave security forces died too. There was no time to even put on bullet proof vests.
The terrorists wore no mask. They were prepared to die, and not walk away to hide later. These terrorists were not prepared to negotiate. Any negotiations are only a diversion for some bigger carnage later. They wore no masks.
No mercy for terrorists anymore! They must be hunted down like dogs with shoot to kill orders!
No mercy for terrorists anymore! They must be hunted down like dogs with shoot to kill orders!
What about USA bombings of civilians in Pakistan, Iraq and Afghanistan, Somalia?
Should we kill USA military forces?
every fuck thing also can tie to pap
We are a small state ruled by PAP for 50 years after all.
Of course every fuck thing can tie to PAP.
This is normal.
Originally posted by xtreyier:
Under such circumstances, the police and security forces definately have to charge and save as many lives as possible. The more they hesitate, the more lives will be lost. They had no choice. Some of the brave security forces died too. There was no time to even put on bullet proof vests.
I wonder how their chief got killed too.... just suay suay at the wrong place... or a hero rushing in first then got killed...
Originally posted by xtreyier:My condolences to her family.
Let's not blame the security forces, but hold the terrorists fully accountable.
Under normal hostage situations, where there is negotiations, no body killed yet, security forces would not move in to mount any rescue operations but hope that negotiations work. Rescuing hostages under such circumstances is pure surgical work, and definately not a walk in the park.
However, the attack at Mumbai is entirely different situation. People were already dying on the streets. The terrorists were killing people indiscriminately and lobbing grenades everywhere.
Under such circumstances, the police and security forces definately have to charge and save as many lives as possible. The more they hesitate, the more lives will be lost. They had no choice. Some of the brave security forces died too. There was no time to even put on bullet proof vests.
The terrorists wore no mask. They were prepared to die, and not walk away to hide later. These terrorists were not prepared to negotiate. Any negotiations are only a diversion for some bigger carnage later. They wore no masks.
No mercy for terrorists anymore! They must be hunted down like dogs with shoot to kill orders!
The terrorist are prepare to die but that doesn't mean they don't negotiate. They have a good reson to hold hostages that is to have their muslim brother release from India Prison.
If u think charging in recklessly and eliminate the terrorist is the best solution. I suggest Indian airforce to drop precision guide bomb to flatten the terrorist hold up area will do. No need for commando for the job and save more indian commando life,right?
The terrorist are holding many hostages, is there a better way to handle the situation and save more innocent hostages???
Originally posted by I-like-flings(m):
I wonder how their chief got killed too.... just suay suay at the wrong place... or a hero rushing in first then got killed...
At least he was not hiding somewhere safe and when sh!t hits the fan, "express disappointment...."
Mumbai duh, India!
wa rao eh... what is our gov going to do about this huh??? attend funeral and live goes on???
Originally posted by Poh Ah Pak:What about USA bombings of civilians in Pakistan, Iraq and Afghanistan, Somalia?
Should we kill USA military forces?
By your logic the US is the culprit for this attack? U r using this to justify the terrorist action in India?
By your logic the US is the culprit for this attack? U r using this to justify the terrorist action in India?
No, I don't think USA instigated this attack or had ties to these attackers.
I don't see any evidence for that.
Although the case is different in Iran.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/CIA
But you are implying that the American use the same standard to kidnap innocent civilian in a non declared combat zone, held them as human shield, objective is to kill as many as possible. In a non declared war zone.
or u simply ignore Xtryer previous paragraph. Cut a sentence and take it out of contexts and use it to steer this topics?
My deepest condolences to her and her family..
But you are implying that the American use the same standard to kidnap innocent civilian in a non declared combat zone
No I didn't imply.
I only asked:
What about USA bombings of civilians in Pakistan, Iraq and Afghanistan, Somalia?
Should we kill USA military forces?
That is quite clear in my opinion.
my condolences..
but, so many other countries also got such thing happened b4... i tink SG making this a too big deal....
I feel fucking sad. RIP.
Originally posted by aHGer^83:my condolences..
but, so many other countries also got such thing happened b4... i tink SG making this a too big deal....
It has great propaganda value, too great for despots not to cash in and squeeze as much political mileage out of it as possible. Reasonable voices like yours will never find a place in the mass media and would surely be drowned out by the propaganda if they mention it in a small corner for wayang wayang purposes.
Originally posted by AndrewPKYap:
It has great propaganda value, too great for despots not to cash in and squeeze as much political mileage out of it as possible. Reasonable voices like yours will never find a place in the mass media and would surely be drowned out by the propaganda if they mention it in a small corner for wayang wayang purposes.
no need to preach me... i dun give a damn...
If i not wrong, THE indian commandos Shot her one la. Fiece gun battle Who care!
Anyway, I hate Terriost
Originally posted by Poh Ah Pak:No, I don't think USA instigated this attack or had ties to these attackers.
I don't see any evidence for that.
Although the case is different in Iran.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/CIA
Yeah, given western intelligence agencies interesting history of carring out false-flag operations. Its hard not to pin the blame on them instead of a fictitious organisation called Al-Qaeda/Islamic terrorist etc. And also, what were the consequence of the attacks, beside the loss of human life (indispensible to the establishment)? Perhaps a US invasion of Pakistan as another facade of the War on Terror?
After all, the BBC has reported that some of the Mumbai attackers were white men, not the arab muslims you would expect.
http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/south_asia/7752625.stm
For those who are able to look at this objectively- http://www.infowars.com/?p=6222
The world needs a hero...