Originally posted by walesa:With the greatest respect, what makes you think the "sugar daddy" was actually voted in?
Hey, I'm in a generous mood. ![]()
well, this might well be a case of a Mp telling the people how he was so underpriviledge that he did not have a chance to enjoy sg's 1st class public transport system.
I hoped he knows next to keep his mouth shut. he may have saved his leave, or save plenty to bring the family for a trip. but his mouth certainly does not.
Originally posted by Callan:I would say....this is rather sad...I meant the elitist mindset. I dun really care how much the civil servant (what's his name?) is spending. I'm more concerned about the future of Singapore, they are rather badly educated in the EQ department.
I got university frens from elite schools and they are more or less ok but the snobbery of their school culture sometimes rubs off on them. I come from a neighbourhood school and sometimes they forget my background and start calling neighbourhood schools stupid. Their favourite insult when they argue with someone not from an elite school: "I'm from HCJC, where you study ar? Neighbourhood school only so kapoeh. You stupid. Shut up."
Originally posted by Gedanken:Hey, if he wants to spend the money, fine, but let's not compartmentalise the issue to the extent where it loses meaning. If he kept it to himself, frankly, who gives a fuck?
On the other hand, when people are in fear of losing their jobs (if they're lucky enough to not already be unemployed), telling the world about how much money you can afford to spend is simply rubbing people's faces in it.
Regardless of the economic situation, I'm willing to wager that for any private businessman, the almost-guaranteed first response to one of his employees saying that he can take five weeks' leave off and not be missed is, "You're not doing enough work". With his spending fifty grand learning to cook liver during that time, the boss would be thinking, "I've paid this bugger too much". Considering this civil servant is being paid too much for not doing enough work, why should there not be outrage about how the public's coffers are being squandered?
Considering this guy's supposed to be part of the system whose mandate is to ensure that people are not in fear of losing their jobs simply grinds salt into gaping wounds.
It simply flies in the face of good old common sense that this leech should be able to tell everyone how much he earns for what little he does, and expect to not attract comment, much less outrage.
that's a different matter altogether isn't it?
we rail against the Senile Management and the high ranking sewer serpents... but what it comes down to is that he got his money honestly (even if you consider it undeserving) and he's blowing his cash his way.. honestly...
i figure anyone who is making a shitload of noise about this is guilty of sour grapes...
nothing to flaunt about..if u think you r rich,..there are other richer than you///...but it is ok and your rite to flaunt whatever you want, just dun get burnt
Originally posted by the Bear:i figure anyone who is making a shitload of noise about this is guilty of sour grapes...
Bear, there wouldn't be any noise if this idiot hadn't gone and bragged about it, especially to a public that's shitting its pants about where the next meal's going to come from. I'd disagree that it's a case of sour grapes - just because this guy drew a salary doesn't necessarily mean that he's earned an honest day's work for an honest day's pay, and his bragging about being able to afford to take all that leave indicates that he hasn't.
But seriously.
Is this a bigger issue then the peanuts issues?
This cannot even qualify as nuts.....
Originally posted by viciouskitty74:But seriously.
Is this a bigger issue then the peanuts issues?
This cannot even qualify as nuts.....
clapz clapz...there's no better way to put it...
Originally posted by viciouskitty74:But seriously.
Is this a bigger issue then the peanuts issues?
This cannot even qualify as nuts.....
That argument just doesn't fly, VK. It's the equivalent of saying, "Hey, I lost a kidney but at least they didn't take out a lung".
Double post. Stupid lag. ![]()
we know our top civil servants are very well paid. what is hurting is the insensitivity.
Obviously the guy was not thinking properly when he agreed to do the interview with the reporter.
Never think of the potential outcry, how can? ![]()
i m LOSER
Originally posted by charlize:Obviously the guy was not thinking properly when he agreed to do the interview with the reporter.
Never think of the potential outcry, how can?
Have u ever wonder that this whole episode is a set up by the govt?? And he act as the fall guy.
I find this story so familar.
FI is super~