U.S.A GOES TO WAR
-
TENsions are building U.s.a getting ready to go war with iraq , And out of de blue s.korea is warning u.s.a not to get their ships near s.korea or not it will react , and also s.korea has already reactivated its nurclear heads, with s.korea rought terrains the only way u.s can attack is with a airborne attack , but it needs to take off from countries near s.korea that is n.korea but de north say it wont allow u.s to deploy from their airbase to attack de guys up south , now they waiting for japan to let them take off from there but yet to get and ans from japan , also do you thing u.s can fight 2 wars in one time with top guns like iraq and s.korea at de same time , so wat you thing can de u.s really do it , also some top countries disapprove of u.s going to war so they wont get much help from other countries and they will be going to war with not much help from other countries , and do you thing sg will help de u.s army or just keep quite and mind their own business
-
war is INEVITABLE
-
Originally posted by gUms:
mi think u mixed up liao...it is N Korea tat reactivate the Nuclear arsenal, not S. Korea...
TENsions are building U.s.a getting ready to go war with iraq , And out of de blue s.korea is warning u.s.a not to get their ships near s.korea or not it will react , and also [b]s.korea has already reactivated its nurclear heads, with s.korea rought terrains the only way u.s can attack is with a airborne attack , but it needs to take off from countries near s.korea that is n.korea but de north say it wont allow u.s to deploy from their airbase to attack de guys up ....[/b]
but realli, war will go on, else so much $$ spent on moving the troops to nearby Iraqi countries, how to justify???
-
sorry some typos here and there
-
sori guys..but N Korea did not reactivate its Nuclear arsenal..they dun have any...they onli activate its Nuclear plant for power...Originally posted by sgboy2004:mi think u mixed up liao...it is N Korea tat reactivate the Nuclear arsenal, not S. Korea...
but realli, war will go on, else so much $$ spent on moving the troops to nearby Iraqi countries, how to justify???
-
tat's the source of nuclear components for their nuclear arsenal, fyi..Originally posted by NathanG5:sori guys..but N Korea did not reactivate its Nuclear arsenal..they dun have any...they onli activate its Nuclear plant for power... -
never mind, guess u were too excited when u were typing..Originally posted by gUms:sorry some typos here and there
Hi gUms, mi is sgboy2004...hello to u, and hav a happy CNY. -
guess this yr got lots of wars coming eh?
-
yea..they can make 7 to 8 nuclear warhead in few weeks...but tat doesnt mean they have it...Originally posted by sgboy2004:tat's the source of nuclear components for their nuclear arsenal, fyi..
http://www.channelnewsasia.com/stories/eastasia/view/31624/1/.html -
but...wat if North Korea really produce nuclear weapon? wat if they dun have?
im not sure myself..cos there is no 100% in things...if they got it...its bad.. -
Originally posted by duotiga83:guess this yr got lots of wars coming eh?
-
sorrie... can edit ur msg?? ur N.korea and S.korea see liao really blurr lah.... Edit ur initial post first..... thanz...
-
The threat will be worldwide if N Korea realii possess such nuclear arsenal.Originally posted by NathanG5:but...wat if North Korea really produce nuclear weapon? wat if they dun have?
im not sure myself..cos there is no 100% in things...if they got it...its bad..
Just like Iraq, if it has such mass destructive weapons in nuclear, biological or chemical, the fear is that Saddam will use it against those that threaten Iraq, and may even choose to use it to dominate the whole world. Worse still, he could let some terrorists to hav such weapons to create havoc throughout the world... and even worse if terrorists realli got hold of such weapons and create disasters for all.
Imagine 1 day, the nuclear arsenal that US or Russia have fell into the hands of terrorists...i am sure we all hav to surrender ourselves or face unprecedented destructive attacks. -
The real reason of US going to war with Iraq is because of the oil.
Everyone has been too influenced b American propaganda. Iraqis and North Koreans taking control of the world? Not likely. The Americans are the ones. -
yea...tat is also one of the possibilityOriginally posted by eurofighter:The real reason of US going to war with Iraq is because of the oil.
Everyone has been too influenced b American propaganda. Iraqis and North Koreans taking control of the world? Not likely. The Americans are the ones.
some of us believe too much of US propaganda....i had an argument with my frens recently..he claim tat N.Korean have Nuclear Warheads now....n they got ICBM..n The North Korean have oredi prepare 100000 so call Commandos to invade South Korea...i ask him where he get those so call facts frm??
he told me its frm Newsweek...duh
look up at those facts now..they have ICBM??
They have the Warheads now??
a hundred thousand Commandos??
the worst thing...y must we label a god damn poor coummnist country an Axis of Evil??
if they have nukes now....y the hell the news kept saying tat the North Korean is now preparing to produce Nukes?
wat for i make a thing i oredi have or make a big HOO HAA now abt nukes(if they really have) when they have it long ago?? -
It is too simplistic counter propaganda to say that the USA is attacking Iraq so as to take possession of Iraqi OIL.
The USA still has a large reserve of oil in their own country, and with their financial power, has been purchasing oil from around the Middle-east instead of using up their own natural reserves.
Both Sadam of Iraq and Kim of North Korea are unstable characters with money, power, and WMD in their possession.
The history of Sadam has shown himself to be ruthless and war mongering. He initiated a ten-year war against neighboring Iran that killed and maimed almost a million men. He used the internationally banned mustard gas against troops and indiscriminately fired long range missiles into Iranian cities. He even killed his own citizens of Kurdish ethnicity, by using gas that wiped out whole townships and villages that killed men, women and children of all ages. He invaded and plundered Kuwait. He is ruthless to the extent of allowing poorly equipped iraqi soldiers to face an international coalition of forces to liberate Kuwait, only to have a large number of the Iraqi foot soldiers killed.
The history of Kim is little different. He was the head of the Korean Spy Agency during his father’s presidency, and was known to have kidnapped Korean actresses whom he admire, as well as kidnapping Japanese tourists traveling overseas – so as to bring them back to North Korea to teach the ‘Japanese Ways’ to North Korean recruits of the North Korean Spy Agency. During his tenure as the Head of the North Korean Spy Agency, he authorized a mission into Myanmar that killed at least six South Korean Ministers and injuring more then a dozen Korean and Myanmar officials.
Both Sadam and Kim have provided financial, material and moral support to terrorists with dubious titles of being “Freedom Fighters”.
This is the kind of lunatics that are developing and controlling Weapons of Mass Destruction.
After the 9-11 incident in New York, and the Bali bombing incident, most Governments are worried that similar fanatics will now gain access to WMD, which can be smuggled into a country in an innocent form acceptable in the daily lives of human activities.
A Twenty-Foot Container can easily slip into busy Singapore Port (or even Hong Kong, Yokohama, San Francisco, or London), and while waiting for clearance, a nuclear device inside this Twenty Foot Container can be set off with a telephone call from abroad.
A holocaust of unimaginable magnitude will be the final consequence of our own lack of understanding to the terrorist threat that we are exposed to. -
And surprise surprise, saddam was brought to power by usa. So whose fault is it?
-
can hear the war drums getting louder n louder.....
-
I do not agree that Saddam should be taken out of power from Iraq. He seems to be have the support of the majority of Iraqis, either that or at least, the control of many Iraqis. If he were to be taken out of power, it would cause severe fighting inside Iraq for the political leadership of Iraq.
However, I agree that Iraqs nuclear, biological and chemical warfare capabilities should be neutralised. The difference between Iraq and other countries with nuclear weapons (except North Korea) is in the making of the decision as to whether or not to launch nukes. While in Iraq, this decision lies in the hands of only Saddam, which makes it very dangerous as the critical decision lies to the whims and fancies of Saddam while in other countries, such as the US, there are checks and counter-checks before a nuke can be launched.
my two cents -
Did you see the "mass support" for the Talebans, when USA was preparing for war to hunt Osama in Afghanistan?Originally posted by laser51088:I do not agree that Saddam should be taken out of power from Iraq. He seems to be have the support of the majority of Iraqis, either that or at least, the control of many Iraqis. If he were to be taken out of power, it would cause severe fighting inside Iraq for the political leadership of Iraq.
However, I agree that Iraqs nuclear, biological and chemical warfare capabilities should be neutralised. The difference between Iraq and other countries with nuclear weapons (except North Korea) is in the making of the decision as to whether or not to launch nukes. While in Iraq, this decision lies in the hands of only Saddam, which makes it very dangerous as the critical decision lies to the whims and fancies of Saddam while in other countries, such as the US, there are checks and counter-checks before a nuke can be launched.
my two cents
There was daily organised "mass demonstration" in Kabul and other Afghan cities villifyin USA for preparing to invade Afghanistan.
Yet, when the Talebans were chased out of Afghanistan, all the common Afghani folks filled the streets, dancing and singing, and welcoming the US Armed Forces as they entered each city.
All the forbiden activities were purposely done in the open - children were doing the forbidden activity of flying kites, playing football, the men were playing music on record and CD players, the women came out to operate the bakeries, attending to the wounded in hospitals filled by both men and women.
Do you seriously believe what you see on TV, all those camera shots on one or two individual screaming support for Saddam, while others in the background grimly hold placards shouting slogans against USA ?
The Iraqi Baath Party is a Political Party from the ethnic Community from which Sadam comes from, and this ethnic group dominate the political scene in Iraq over all the other ethnic groups.
This kind of politics spells trouble for any country.
Sadam's hold on power is dependent on his Security Service, Hardline Supporters that think and behave like him, and a Special Military Group that protects him and the Baath Party. -
sigh.... the sounds of war drums sounds again...
*imagine two towers where orcs storm helmsdeep*
anyway to yr question. i tink signapore mind their own business.
i wonder wat australia will do though -
First Iraq, then N.K. Then Iran.
Bush is gonna wipe out the Axis of Evil one at a time. -
sori bro..but how come we're so sure they're evil? maybe Iraq is a yes...but N'Korea n Iran? wat they do??Originally posted by Shotgun:First Iraq, then N.K. Then Iran.
Bush is gonna wipe out the Axis of Evil one at a time. -
They just being alive is... apparently...
-
the most sian thing is reservist!!!! ta ma de....dunno will we males get activated on alert or not....
in times of war, it's not the soldiers that are dangerous...we have rifles and bullets...it's the children and women......remember how the japs throw the babies in the air and poke them with bayonets...and our women being "comfort women"....u know what's the worst thing? to see you love ones got gang rape and u are tied to a tree and couldn't do anything.....cham ah!