Originally posted by Poh Ah Pak:Talk so much cock also never support PAP.
actually this is quite funny, you had asked me whose fault it is, and I responded to your question politely....
you respond by saying that I "talk so much cock"?
tsk tsk.
Originally posted by Poh Ah Pak:Fact remains:
No one passionately supports People's Action Party.
I think no one passionately support any party.
Passion changes over time. People used to passionately support Andy Lau, Aaron Kwok, now the same people may be supporting Jay Chou.
The couple in the relationship love each other passionately. But alot of things in a relationship is about compromising.
Originally posted by airgrinder:I think no one passionately support any party.
Passion changes over time. People used to passionately support Andy Lau, Aaron Kwok, now the same people may be supporting Jay Chou.
The couple in the relationship love each other passionately. But alot of things in a relationship is about compromising.
hard to say... the old aunties still support sam hui, adam cheng, lisa wang and frances yip.
Originally posted by Poh Ah Pak:No one passionately supports People's Action Party. (in this forum at least)
Anyone disagrees with above statement?
I started this thread to find out who in this forum passionately supports PAP.
The conclusion so far from replies is that:
No one passionately supports People's Action Party in this forum.
even if one passionately supports the pap it doesn't mean they're irrational enough to come in and post here.
anyway passion itself's a personal thing. you're making it sound like its a good thing when it might not be so.
I think no one passionately support any party.
That's because our system is repressive.
Originally posted by Poh Ah Pak:That's because our system is repressive.
if you already think so, why bother to ask that question in the first place?
if you already think so, why bother to ask that question in the first place?
Test my theory that no one supports PAP.
Originally posted by Poh Ah Pak:Test my theory that no one supports PAP.
then why bother to insult people....?? who is going to post even though they support PAP?
what is this, a rigged survey?
what is this, a rigged survey?
Ya this survey is rigged.
Actually there were hundreds of people supporting PAP.
Originally posted by Poh Ah Pak:Ya this survey is rigged.
thanks for being honest, finally.
thanks for being honest, finally.
How you know I not lying?
Actually there is not a single person in this forum that supports PAP with passion.
Originally posted by Poh Ah Pak:How you know I not lying?
Actually there is not a single person in this forum that supports PAP with passion.
because i respect you to know that you don't lie. you believe me?
Actually there is not a single person in this forum that supports PAP with passion.
I don't think above statement is inaccurate.
Hey.....I support PAP....why..?
Yes I support it "with passion"
I am ideologically diametrically opposed to you.
You keep on talking about North Korea, opression, USSR, I dont know what relevance those countries have with SG.
SG does not have any real "opression" and very little resemblance with North Korea or USSR.
I just do not undertand your views. You are quite radical, almost an extermist. Your view is very strong.
I already give a few examples of why "managed democracy" is a superior system and why single party dominance with semi-authoritarianism is a better system, and why the dismantling of this PAP dominance will bring only self-inflicted damage.
"Democracy" looks good on paper.
Only.
The dismantling of the PAP will bring tremendous unneccessary cost to Singapore.
There is a very important proverb which Id like to quote:
"If it aint broke, dont fix it"
But that only tells you one part. Another part is that if you can see the "fix" that you want to introduce is actually more inferior, so why do it..?
I am not here to say that PAP is perfect. There are some deficiencies as well. However, it is worth continuing, and improving of course.
You keep on talking about North Korea, opression, USSR, I dont know what relevance those countries have with SG.
All states dominated by one party.
All states with media controlled by state.
All states ruled by a tiny ruling clique.
All states where political activity is suppressed.
The dismantling of the PAP will bring tremendous unneccessary cost to Singapore.
But they lost 100 billion already.
SG does not have any real "opression" and very little resemblance with North Korea or USSR.
Chia Thye Poh and others?
Your view is very strong.
What is "weak" view then?
I already give a few examples of why "managed democracy" is a superior system
I'm all for that.
The problem now is that the system is too repressive, too managed.
I just do not undertand your views.
Don't understand what views?
Come and tell me, I explain one by one to you.
I don't agree with many of their ways, so they are not my choice. The only thing I support them is maintaining peace and harmony among the races and religions.
They are too money making driven as politicians for my support.
I talk money politic, give me the $200 first
after i received then I air my view
Ha ha ha, likewise if LKY dies I will cry for him if he gives me part of his wealth, ha ha ha.
Originally posted by Meat Pao:Hey.....I support PAP....why..?
Yes I support it "with passion"
you are now officially counted as "1".
actually that's all, remember the objective of this thread is: who and how many - so there's meat pao and it's "1".... the why is never part of the issue.
no need to enter into an ideological argument with poh... because that's not part of his stated objective.
however, i believe his real intention is to find some "REAL" PAP fans to argue with... so unless you are prepared to go the long haul.... it is absolutely unnecessary.
Originally posted by Fantagf:I don't agree with many of their ways, so they are not my choice. The only thing I support them is maintaining peace and harmony among the races and religions.
They are too money making driven as politicians for my support.
you can register your views on the other thread... which badly needed some supporters.