Singaporeans are not brainwashed by PAP?
If they only exposed to state media without reading criticism, then for sure they are being brainwashed by PAP regime.
Just like the majority of people here.
Before coming to this forum, don't tell me you are not brainwashed by state media.
Originally posted by sgdiehard:our loyalty should be to the country... political parties are just there to serve the country...
agree....
but I am sure you would also agree that this is not easy to do in our country...
many still rightly or wrongly equates sg = pap.....
many still rightly or wrongly equates sg = pap.....
Due to brainwashing from state media.
That is obvious.
Originally posted by Poh Ah Pak:If they only exposed to state media without reading criticism, then for sure they are being brainwashed by PAP regime.
Just like the majority of people here.
Before coming to this forum, don't tell me you are not brainwashed by state media.
Unlike folks in DPRK and PRC, we can access the web look at the alternatives and their effects elsewhere in the world.
For how long?
Lee Hsien Loong already voiced out saying he wants to regulate internet content.
He doesn't like online criticism of his regime.
Singapore authorities recently harassed an Asia
Times Online contributor for a November story that detailed the island state's
mounting financial troubles.
Police claimed that the article had been sent with added malicious comments to
the head of state, opposition politicians and newspapers from the reporter's
e-mail account. The reporter denied the charge and police officials later
indicated that an unidentified hacker had sent the message from her account.
Either way, the reporter has been put on official notice that her online
writings and e-mail activities are under surveillance.
Originally posted by Poh Ah Pak:If they only exposed to state media without reading criticism, then for sure they are being brainwashed by PAP regime.
Just like the majority of people here.
Before coming to this forum, don't tell me you are not brainwashed by state media.
If state media are
1. What opposition assume to have altered/brainwashed singaporeans voting for them and instead, voted PAP.
2. What opposition wanted to have a share of it in order to influence the mass.
3. What the opposition taking it as excuses and reasons for their politcal failure.
I think that is a very lame opposition in the view of we, the younger generation.
Originally posted by Poh Ah Pak:For how long?
Lee Hsien Loong already voiced out saying he wants to regulate internet content.
He doesn't like online criticism of his regime.
Singapore authorities recently harassed an Asia Times Online contributor for a November story that detailed the island state's mounting financial troubles.
Police claimed that the article had been sent with added malicious comments to the head of state, opposition politicians and newspapers from the reporter's e-mail account. The reporter denied the charge and police officials later indicated that an unidentified hacker had sent the message from her account. Either way, the reporter has been put on official notice that her online writings and e-mail activities are under surveillance.
haha, why government cannot regulate internet? than those internet scammers will always be able to get away?
What about people who sent email with malicious comments? also just let them do what they want?
Vote PAP does not mean PAP supporter.
Vote SDP does not mean SDP supporter.
Join opposition party does not mean cannot vote PAP.
If read government media means being brainwashed by PAP.
Then reading opposition newsletter means being brainwashed by opposition.
Before comming to this forum, don't tell me you are not brainwashed somehow.
Originally posted by skythewood:If you think no, tell me why. Most people don't even care about the politics that much anyway....... so there are no truly and sincere hardcore supporters.
we all started being brainwashed....Tell me for most of you growing up in the 70s, 80s early 90s, which kindergarten you attend. (This before the sudden outcrop of private schools in the late 90s - present)
Pri Sch - attending the national day parade or watching at home, which is the only political party have its own marching contigent with banners?
Sec Sch - Reading state-approved history books which glossed over the gritty details on how this island state comes about.
I could drag on and on....The fundamental truth is PAP is a better-refined Nazi-esque party without the racial prejudice policy openly espoused. A facist organization.
Comparisons between the two Political Party Doctrines and actions
Operation Cold Store - Night Of The Long Knives
NCC,NPCC - Hitler Youth
Instigating communal riots, worker riots. Accusing opponents of starting them -
Instigating lies against the Jewish community, causing the public to take matters in theit own hands
State controlled media - State controlled media
MM openly saying about eugenics on how smart people are coupled to preserve the community. - Lebensborn Policy
And the most damning of all (Not Nazi Related, but close)
British Facist Party People's Action Party

Where have I seen this yellow hammer in red background before....

I know!! Here!

By the way, among the kindergarten students, who gives a shit about politics?
true - but when during the age where the mind is still developing, it creates the notion that a particular symbol is synonymous with good, innocent stuff... who equates kindergarten with a political symbol anywhere in the world? Only Singapore to my knowledge.