I am wondering who started the GRC system? The person who came up with this idea.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Constituencies_of_Singapore
please study. It is PAP who amended the Election departments. Let brace up. We should see new young voters voting for the oppostion. I gotta a feeling that opposition should be able to win one GRC and i want to see which Minister is going to be out of parliament.
Win one GRC = Miracle lo.
Originally posted by ~PEPPER~:I am wondering who started the GRC system? The person who came up with this idea.
LKY come out with the system, Goh Chok Tong vetted it, and 66.6% of the people of Singapore approved it.
Originally posted by angel7030:
LKY come out with the system, Goh Chok Tong vetted it, and 66.6% of the people of Singapore approved it.
.. .. . . pouring out shit and urinating here once again . .. . . you know nothing about it just be humble and shut up your fcuking gap . .. . . 66.6% of the people were the voters . . . voting for the PAP in the last election . . .. 66.6% does not mean they approve the GRC system . . .. .
.. . don't act a stupid smart alec . . . . when you have nothing good to offer here . . .. you only are expert in shitting and urinating here to blur .. . . others' vision.
. .. . you have great propensity to make yourself an idiot . . . .
everytime said me pour shit and urine, you think I got so many shit and urine meh??
I dun like this system. This system is kind of wierd.
Originally posted by angel7030:
LKY come out with the system, Goh Chok Tong vetted it, and 66.6% of the people of Singapore approved it.
Those who voted for PAP might nt approve of GRC system.
Originally posted by ~PEPPER~:
Those who voted for PAP might nt approve of GRC system.
GRC system is not only to undermine the opposition weakness but also to gain an economy of scale in ruling. When i young in school, i remembered a Mr Lim Boon Heng came and talk to us about GRC. He said that Singapore being small, a few small towns gather together to form a group is better than each town going for election individually, that will be tedious and also waste time and effort for both the voters and the parties concern. Just like buying things in bulk will be cheaper than buying thing one by one. And it is not something that the govt is playing a game here, the govt just wanted to consolidate these towns as one adminstration, one town council, one office and so on so as to be better than creating useless extra councils, offices and having excess people in adminstration, which is very costly and add no value to it. And such costs are taxpayers money. So in view of these aspects, the govt decide to create GRCs so that more brains is better than one, and please dun think that GRC is to make the opposition difficult, if you look at the other way, we are also putting ourselve at risk, if an opposition party won a GRC, they won 4 to 5 seats at one shot, if 2 GRCs, that will be 9 to 10 seats at one go, which is also a benefit to opposition. It is a level and fair field the govt is playing, we did not reduce or shift our goal post. At the end the day, GRC is mend to consolidate for the sake of economy of scale
The ruling party came out with the GRC base on kiasuism and kiasism.
Voting for PAP is not equivalent to approving the GRC system. Voting in Singapore is made mandatory.
kong simi leh?
I shall save my words to explain. One only is expert at talking nonsense, have the mind dwell on garbage that block one's understanding of facts.
sori lah, ask only angry liao..
I am not angry, just stating facts, don't misinterpret.
i am just asking what are you saying mah, like kaisism, what kaisuism,....like this also cannot...nveremind.
Originally posted by angel7030:i am just asking what are you saying mah, like kaisism, what kaisuism,....like this also cannot...nveremind.
The truth is that hum7030 belongs only to the garbage can and not Singapore.
Hope gt lesser GRCs in next elections.
Originally posted by hasene:The ruling party came out with the GRC base on kiasuism and kiasism.
Voting for PAP is not equivalent to approving the GRC system. Voting in Singapore is made mandatory.
A voter eligible to vote, but does not vote. Nothing will happen to him or her.
Since did not vote in the election, the name will be strike out for the next election.
To reinstate name, fill up form and pay administration fee of $5.00
Voting is not mandatory or even compulsory.
Only requirement is to vote properly. Don't misbehave at the polling station, Don't deface the polling card.
Originally posted by mancha:A voter eligible to vote, but does not vote. Nothing will happen to him or her.
Since did not vote in the election, the name will be strike out for the next election.
To reinstate name, fill up form and pay administration fee of $5.00
Voting is not mandatory or even compulsory.
Only requirement is to vote properly. Don't misbehave at the polling station, Don't deface the polling card.
It was announced over and over again during election campaign that voting is mandatory (I am referring to the past election). lee hsien loong himself stated that voting was a mandate.
Originally posted by angel7030:i am just asking what are you saying mah, like kaisism, what kaisuism,....like this also cannot...nveremind.
Don't be sneaky, your question did not include asking about kiasism and kiasuism. Look, you are not even capable of spelling these two words correctly so don't expect any respect for you.
the election department should be independent of any parties to maintain neutrality and fairness to all, how ironic.
I dun like compulsory voting. In taiwan it's not compulsory.
Originally posted by hasene:
Don't be sneaky, your question did not include asking about kiasism and kiasuism. Look, you are not even capable of spelling these two words correctly so don't expect any respect for you.
well, kaisi and kaisu is not even in the dictionary, what you expect, to learn to spell them correctly???
Originally posted by ~PEPPER~:I dun like compulsory voting. In taiwan it's not compulsory.
hello, in taiwan, they paid you to vote...politicians, mafias, lawmakers, leaders and judges are all jumble into one big mess...even rally also got stripe shows
Originally posted by -StarDust-:Hope gt lesser GRCs in next elections.
it will be lesser, from 5 to 4 GRCs. I urge citizens of singapore not to see GRCs as a tool of the ruling party working toward their advantages, you can make the differences, take the weakness of GRC instead, a win by opposition will take in 4 to 5 seats, and that is the loop in GRCs. Once a GRC is won, i guess in the the next election after the coming one will have no GRC liao