Originally posted by nismoS132:
everyone's a whining about how things are bad, and that it's just going to get worse. if you have ideas and solutions, but yet aren't willing to test them out, then you don't really have much to complain about being labelled a quitter.
i don't enjoy the use of the classification of stayers and quitters, too much generalisation, but the fact is that you guys ARE quitting on the rest of us. and then turning around and laughing at us as though all of a sudden, we're beneath you.
there are ways to make things better, online discourse is good, but action is what counts. if you're afraid of the stigma (and risks) of being a politician (of either party), then work it out from the private sector. even then, you can't suddenly just come in and demand change saying "our system is no good, theirs is better. let's uproot ours and use theirs." change takes time. as little as there has been, things have changed. and with the passing of time, will only get better.
you can watch in the building of rome, or you can take part in it. you may or may not live to taste your labour, but at least you've attempted to make a difference. doesn't that count for something?
if staying behind means we're the sheep of the PAP, leaving just puts you under a different shepherd.
Nismos, have a careful read of the posts above, especially the ones about being “problem children”. Would they have been “problem children” if they hadn’t tried testing their ideas and solutions out? I think it’s presumptuous of you to assume that we haven’t.
Look at people’s reactions to Xprobe’s initial statement about being a problem child. These are people who have been there, pushed the limits and run up against a wall time and time again. No, actually I’ll correct myself – they have been run up against a wall time and time again. These are people who have tried to do the right thing by convincing, consulting, confronting and eventually coercing, and at the end of the day they’re lucky if the reaction they get is confusion. From the looks of the posts here, what you have quite easily adds up to at least 30 combined years of experience in testing out ideas and solutions, only to have them canned by the naysayers and sheep. It’s no sudden change we’re asking for – our conclusions are driven by continuous and chronic resistance to change.
And here you come, adding insult to injury, assuming that these people have not tried. If they had not tried to change things and been noticed for trying, why were they labeled problem children? Wouldn’t they just have been another face in the crowd? The sentiment that you have expressed is one of the things that makes the people who have tried, pushed, been knocked about for trying, and then having had it all written off as a nonevent, say “Forget it, I’m cutting my losses here”. You said “at least you’ve attempted to make a difference”, at the same time blithely ignoring the prior attempts of these people to make a difference. You ask if it counts for something? I think you’ve just provided us with an answer yourself, and it’s a resounding no.
Just have a look at the people who have posted here – the level of intelligence you find here is much higher than the average in Singapore (yes, that even includes ST, loathe as I am to admit it

). From what I know of these posters, we have an accountant, a successful business owner, a race engineer-to-be and a psychologist (apologies to the rest - I don’t know what you guys do). We are the ones who want to build Rome, and we are the ones who see that what’s actually being built is a Hollywood set. Every time we point out the obvious, we have our intelligence insulted by being told, “No, the proper answer is yes sir, no sir, three bags full”.
And still you assume we’ve never tried. Where have you been, Nismos? What have YOU done? Have you been to teach in a government school, to find that your colleagues meant it when they told you not to work too hard on the first day? Have you been backstabbed for delivering better results than your colleagues, because you spotted a grievous error and corrected it? Have you spent hours presenting your case in the clearest and most compelling way possible, only to be told, “But that’s just not the way we’ve done things”, while leaving the key issues untouched? Have you watched someone 20 years your senior get knocked into the slow lane because he dared to try and be innovative?
Until you can truly appreciate the feeling of the posters who commiserated with Xprobe, I don’t think you’ve got any business speculating if we’ve tried. That’s naïve at best, sanctimonious at worst.
Am I a quitter? Hell, yes, and proud of it. IÂ’ve got to see the self-possession to step back and assess my situation and see that in this environment, making a contribution means shutting up and doing as youÂ’re told. IÂ’ve got the experience to tell me that trying to help build Rome is a losing proposition, not because Rome cannot be built but because some idiot in charge is using the blueprints for Lot 5 at Universal Studios instead. Sure IÂ’ll quit, and thatÂ’s testimony to my common sense. Why would I want to be a team player when the team (in the very loosest sense of the word) doesnÂ’t even know the objective of the game?
Am I laughing at you because all of a sudden you’re beneath me? Why would I? The only thing that would show is that I’m still carrying the baggage of my experiences here. I’m not even thinking about you – I’ve got bigger fish to fry.
The laugh I’m laughing is a relieved one – I’ve escaped those miserable confines and gotten myself a real life.
IÂ’m under no illusions about being under a different shepherd now. What IÂ’m happy about is that said shepherd is my conscience.