Sorry, Viper, we're covering a lot of the same ground here, but it's essential to my point!

It's true, cookiecutter, that under LKY's leadership, Singapore has experienced a rate of development that is pretty amazing. This economy has grown like it's on steroids. However, like in the case of steroids, one needs to be aware of the side-effects. Are they going to result in malformations of the organs that will eventually kill or cripple the user?
I believe that since perhaps the early 1980's, these side effects have been steadily becoming more visible. Success in the manufacturing game is influenced by your ability to produce the same goods at a much lower price. However, with the rising costs of living and value of the Singaporean dollar, how long could we have kept the price low? Sooner or later the game would have had to change to suit the circumstances.
Right now, as a First World country by economic standards, Singapore would probably best be served by market creation, rather than by fighting for market share (which really depends on your ability to deliver better value per dollar than other countries). A good example of market creation is Creative TechnologyÂ’s introduction of the Sound Blaster, but nobody seems to have been able to follow suit.
Creative’s director, Sim Wong Hoo, lists “being creative” as one of his hobbies. Unfortunately, as the government itself has acknowledged through things like its entrepreneurship drives, Singaporeans are not being creative enough. For the first 25 years or so of independence, Singapore’s success was built upon the ability of the people to shut up, follow orders and in so doing get the overall effort to progress as rapidly as possible. That ability has not been replaced by the required creativity, and has become an unwelcome side effect of those economic steroids - we have not adapted to the new game as dictated by the change in the country’s circumstances.
Indeed, as has been expressed in many of the threads related to “quitters”, in the “shut up and follow orders” environment, independent thinkers were, and still are, seen as loose cannons on deck and made pariahs. Now that these people are being driven off, Singapore’s capacity to play the new game is being diminished.
In essence, with its latest moves of telling people not to be fussy about the work they take up, and trying to get them to perform the same work with wage cuts, the government is trying to flog the dead horse that is the old game. The situation is exacerbated by slaves of the system like sunny, who tell non-supporters of the old game “maybe water in foreign countries would taste better...”, thereby further encouraging the brain drain.
The bottom line is that the foresight employed by the government in the early part of SingaporeÂ’s independence is not being employed now, and for that, I propose that dissatisfaction with the government is justified.