Originally posted by Viper52:
You make good points Atobe, which I fully agree with. Then again, this Ryan Goh chap set himself up for the fall by drafting the petition, urging his colleagues to sign and then REFUSE to do likewise.
LKY used the opportunity to paint Singaporean citizens and PRs who acquire PR as people who have "fall-back positions" and hence willing to rock the boat because they can flee is Singapore fails. That is nothing new, we all know how the Ruling Party sees them as quitters. Thats fine by me, because I look around this forum and I know thats not true. A lot are people who love Singapore but simply had enough of LKY and his ilk and choose to leave. Theres nothing wrong in that.
What Ryan Goh did with his actions was to allow the Ruling Party paint Singaporeans with foriegn PRs as people with QUESTIONABLE CHARACTER, who agitate behind the scenes but do not have the courage to put their money where their mouths are. Ryan Goh is a snivelling rat, but not all who take foreign PRs are.
I am not so sure if Capt Ryan Goh had set himself up as a Fall Guy, or whether he was singled out to be one in the usual political strategy adopted by SM LKY handling of any Opposition.
From the ST report of Capt Ryan Goh's statement there seems already a loss of faith by the general membership of ALPA-S towards the ability of the previous ALPA-S Committee - of which Capt Ryan Goh was a member.
Being a Committee Member, he has a right to have an opposing view from that held by the Committee, as would the case be from the General Membership of ALPA-S.
Interestingly enough, nothing was mentioned as to how many others in the previous Committee held similar position as Capt Goh, and if they were Singaporeans or foreigners holding Singapore PR status.
The fact that Capt Goh was singled out remains unfortunate, and is typical of SM's style of Politics in making one person an examplary fall guy, so as to discipline the others.
Unfortunately, he did not count on the reply that Capt Goh made, and ST published in some detail; and which seem to necessitate another article 48 hours later to clear up any doubt as to SM's control of the meeting.
It was to the credit of those at the meeting with SM LKY, from the present and previous ALPA-S leadership, to have faced SM squarely, and to the extent of even turning down NTUC Secretary-General's invitation for ALPA-S to be under the umbrella of the NTUC.
Interestingly, the rebuttal from the President of ALPA-S - which embarrassed the Sec-General of NTUC - was not published in the ST report but had slipped through the censors scissors at ChannelNewsAsia.
Surely Capt Ryan Goh was intelligent enought to have given a reasonable reply to the accusation that he instigated and crafted the 'PETITION', and refusing to sign it ?
I will not be surprised if his reply to this point had been censored, and I would guess his reply would have followed the following lines -
that he was one amongst the Committee Members opposing the decision of compromising to the SIA Management - in the face of list of grieviances that has been endured by all at ALPA-S, and which SIA Management had refused to respond to,
that SIA Management do not believe in dealing with ALPA-S with equal status and respect;
that he was given this task of drafting a petition by the Members, and being in the Committee he could not possibly sign on that petition to sack himself.
It remains unfortunate that a PR - whose talent was sought by Singapore - is being singled out for abuse, and that his status as a PR do not entitle him to represent himself - or be represented in any industrial action.
This will be a telling statement to all PR in Singapore, and any others who plan to take up PR status.
It would have been helpful if the rights and privileges of PRs in Singapore be made clearer, and that PRs be informed that they have NO RIGHTS to any benefits of Industrial Representations.
With regards to SM LKY's view of Singaporeans taking Foreign PR status, it is unfortunate that he has allowed Singapore to benefit from the services offered by PR from other countries.
It is typical hypocrisy of the Ruling Party that they should encourage Singaporeans to spread our Wings, and yet will deride Singaporeans who take up PR status in foreign countries so as to circumvent the regulations of host countries in deterring 'economic migrants'.
Will it not be to this effect that by telling Singaporeans to spread our Wings is practically making Singaporeans to be 'Economic Migrants' in one form or another ?