Opening of Casino in singapore *yes* or *no*
-
NO!!!!!!!!! No No No! NO!!!!!!!! Gambling Sucks!
-
except for mahjong.Originally posted by 798:NO!!!!!!!!! No No No! NO!!!!!!!! Gambling Sucks!
-
no...bcos more gamble ghost....then families will suffer...esp if the parents or children like to gamble.
-
Is the problem a bit exaggerated due to the many Hong Kong or Singapore shows we watched ?
I can remember a scene where a girl has to get her hands fried because she owes them money -
yuan DU FU suOriginally posted by socrates:Is the problem a bit exaggerated due to the many Hong Kong or Singapore shows we watched ?
I can remember a scene where a girl has to get her hands fried because she owes them money 
-
YES FOR CASINO!!Originally posted by subudei:I'm probably going to get flamed for this, but my vote has to be 'YES'.
And why not? We can't, and shouldn't, nursemaid people forever. The choice of whether or not to gamble is a personal decision which should be the individual's prerogative. I don't like gambling myself, but I don't think a ban is the way to go, especially since all we're doing is driving the industry underground, and driving people to those huge casino cruise ships that ply international waters. Personally, I don't think the ban is doing much good at all.
The majority of you, do not realize that Singapore's economy is not growing, and we are facing the worst recession. We are in dire need of a major boost in our economy to get it going.
Singapore has used up most of its trump cards, what I mean by trump cards, are tools which Singapore can utilize to boost the economy.
The very first card, was our PSA port. Which is currently facing strict competition from the Pelatas M'sia port.
Our second card, was Changi airport as a hub and SIA, which is also facing a downturn due to low cost air carriers and losing Changi as an international hub as newer planes can travel further distances and there would'nt be a need to stopover at Singapore.
3rd, 4th card, is our semiconductor and oil refineries. Both facing strict competition and decreased capital inflow.
Singapore as a HQ hub is being phrased out as China is still the biggest thing, its low cost to setup there and most of the factories are out there.
Can you think of another trump card Singapore can use?
Now, instead of complaining about bad vices of gambling, ever realize that cities do remarkably well with casinos.
London has several casions.
Perth has a Casino.
Sdyney has Star City Casino.
Melbourne has Crown Casino.
Macau, Genting M'sia, Las Vegas...
If its so bad, why are'nt these cities and its people crumbling to their feet. Most the citizens in these cities should be beggars already, to what you people have said about how bad a casino is for the people.
A Casino, can bring people/tourist to invest more in Singapore, such as buying/renting properties(fill up all the empty condos...), spending on items like food and clothing....
Seriously, do think with an open mind, how a Casino can benefit Singapore and how disadvantageous it can be. Please backup your suggestions with constructive ideas.
Singapore has no natural resources, with little land, we can only depend on providing high class services and products. -
if my calculation is not wrong,
so far there r
10 votes for "NO"
6 votes for "Yes"
3 vote for "no comments" -
I think some social problems will appear... however it can help in our economy... I will not interfere and let Gov implement it or reject it.
-
well, i hate to say this, but i gotta say yes as a casino would really improve our world status, but i am really in for the casino to only grant membership to people that have a certain financial standard, and each person can only gamble till a certain amount a day(this can be set according to their financial condition), but, i must say that maybe they can grant admission, to all, but only allow members to gamble........because i sure would like to see the interior of a casino
-
even when i went vegas twice i was more interested in staying in the luxurious hotels (and the charges were cheap! i was a student den!) and going for those crazy buffets! had buffets for almost every meals! and o cos not to forget the cabaret shows and all. hardly gambled there.Originally posted by snk86:well, i hate to say this, but i gotta say yes as a casino would really improve our world status, but i am really in for the casino to only grant membership to people that have a certain financial standard, and each person can only gamble till a certain amount a day(this can be set according to their financial condition), but, i must say that maybe they can grant admission, to all, but only allow members to gamble........because i sure would like to see the interior of a casino -
By saying that, you're making Singapore citizens second class citizens in their own country. And you're adding another C to the category of 4Cs... we have enuff stupid Cs already, makes Singaporeans become more materialistic!Originally posted by snk86:well, i hate to say this, but i gotta say yes as a casino would really improve our world status, but i am really in for the casino to only grant membership to people that have a certain financial standard, and each person can only gamble till a certain amount a day(this can be set according to their financial condition), but, i must say that maybe they can grant admission, to all, but only allow members to gamble........because i sure would like to see the interior of a casino
4Cs + C = 5Cs
Car
Club membership
Condo
Credit card
Casino
Reason being, you cannot check a tourist's financial background esp when he comes from switzerland and has a secret swiss bank account! Thus, tourist's from M'sia, indo, india, even the taliban can go into the Casino, so you might see bin laden inside gambling with some genting highland ah-long and an ex-rioter from the indonesian elections playing poker.
SG ah-beng: I wanna gamble leh, but ah, I, errr sinGa'POORer'an earn only 2k, work hard yet cannot enjoy this or that, only thing I really get in FINEs and more FINEs.
M'sia ah-beng: I earn double your salary as its worth more in Johor and even am part of the SS, heh I can go anytime to gamble in your country.
SG ah-beng: I go become M'sian already lah, no NS, can still work in sg and earn double salary sum mor3!
Thats a second class act! I must say! -
No to casino, whether u r rich or poor.Gambling imo is a very bad habit. It can break up families. There wouldnt b any loanshark if there is not gambling.And maybe in the near future, the government may introduce some sort of gambling taxes.
-
There must be some gambling tax targeted at the owner of the casino or big winners. Otherwise what is the point of opening a casino...
-
u say liao, that is las vegas,Originally posted by wuming78:even when i went vegas twice i was more interested in staying in the luxurious hotels (and the charges were cheap! i was a student den!) and going for those crazy buffets! had buffets for almost every meals! and o cos not to forget the cabaret shows and all. hardly gambled there.
singapore such a kiasu country with kiasu people, i dun think it will happen in singapore ...
-
Do you know how much singaporeans gambling outside, in BT today, it stated that "Analysts said it makes sense for Genting to be involved in the Singapore casino project to help retain a slice of the Singapore market. Close to a quarter of Genting's gamblers, who help generate nearly RM1 billion (S$444.2 million) in bets every year, come from Singapore."Originally posted by Hitakogi:u say liao, that is las vegas,
singapore such a kiasu country with kiasu people, i dun think it will happen in singapore ...
That equates to about $110 million Sing dollars being sucked out of Singaporean pockets into M'sia. That is just Genting! There's tons of Singaporeans who go to LV, cruises, Macau...
Econ 101: Capital outflow of a country, makes the country poorer!
Casino, provides a capital inflow from foreign investors(gamblers).
Singapore will be better off!
Singapore has been in a recession since 1997 if you guys do not realize it esp those still in school. How are we going to boost our economy, if you can think of one, you will win the nobel prize! -
Yes! I totally agree with , the multi million dollar ministers have ran out of idea on how to increase Singapore revenue. Casino is an easy way out. And lets hope with the revenue rollng in from the casino they will give us poor peasants a break! No more bus/mrt fare hike, no more gst hike, etc, etc ........Originally posted by :YES FOR CASINO!!
The majority of you, do not realize that Singapore's economy is not growing, and we are facing the worst recession. We are in dire need of a major boost in our economy to get it going.
Singapore has used up most of its trump cards, what I mean by trump cards, are tools which Singapore can utilize to boost the economy.
The very first card, was our PSA port. Which is currently facing strict competition from the Pelatas M'sia port.
Our second card, was Changi airport as a hub and SIA, which is also facing a downturn due to low cost air carriers and losing Changi as an international hub as newer planes can travel further distances and there would'nt be a need to stopover at Singapore.
3rd, 4th card, is our semiconductor and oil refineries. Both facing strict competition and decreased capital inflow.
Singapore as a HQ hub is being phrased out as China is still the biggest thing, its low cost to setup there and most of the factories are out there.
Can you think of another trump card Singapore can use?
Now, instead of complaining about bad vices of gambling, ever realize that cities do remarkably well with casinos.
London has several casions.
Perth has a Casino.
Sdyney has Star City Casino.
Melbourne has Crown Casino.
Macau, Genting M'sia, Las Vegas...
If its so bad, why are'nt these cities and its people crumbling to their feet. Most the citizens in these cities should be beggars already, to what you people have said about how bad a casino is for the people.
A Casino, can bring people/tourist to invest more in Singapore, such as buying/renting properties(fill up all the empty condos...), spending on items like food and clothing....
Seriously, do think with an open mind, how a Casino can benefit Singapore and how disadvantageous it can be. Please backup your suggestions with constructive ideas.
Singapore has no natural resources, with little land, we can only depend on providing high class services and products. -
The condition of recession mentioned by is structural in nature.
While conventional recovery tactics can do little but to relief upon the immediate damage, there is little more that these tactics can do to prevent the new wave of seasonal hit.
To effectively rectify on this problem, what is needed is, is a quantum leap performed on our current economic engine model to re-modify it into a better and more efficient one.
Transformational changes are usually revolutionary in nature and in the case at hand, an example of transformational change would be a hypothetical decision to build up the Tourism industry as a whole towards the end goal of having the industry to fuel 20% of the total GDP (This is an example only, of course).
The allowing of a casino is only tactical in nature, meaning that at best, the implementation of plan thru can only reap in rewards at an ordinary level of return (in the value of strategic importance), and not extraordinary in scale.
It is good that has also brought in the issue of ‘Trump-Cards’ in his/her discussion.
A point that I have noted though, is that in Â’s description of the Trump-CardsÂ’ performance, there seemed to be signals indicating abandon.
Of course in face of the harsh economic operating environment, the challenges are naturally greater.
What is more important and constructive at hand then – would be an effective ‘Reload’ mechanism to re-study on where structural lags or genuine unnecessary expenditure has been made – and to effectively take speedy corrective actions to fix up these problems as part of total systems redesigning and execution.
All – the PSA, Changi Airport, our SIA, the semiconductor, chemical refining industries, have had billions of taxpayers’ dollars, and billions and billions more drip of sweat and effort put in by the people before these famous names of success can be capable of being made known to all those who see and hear of us globally.
What they need now – is period of time to consolidate and re-strategize, before they set off forward with a better grasp of the newer competitive reality, as well as the new strengths and weaknesses that each and every individual one of them had already built up over the recent decade. -
In reply to the list of casino cities that you have offered, I have to acknowledge that I do not know much about the Australian cities where casino exist.
But consequently, what I do know about London is that it is also the top ranking city in the world where the highest known amount of money laundering is busy taking place.
Macau, Malaysia and Las Vegas – need we elaborate much, are notorious for their lawlessness.
And although we do not see much physical beggars around the streets, what we can expect from families living within an active sphere of influence from the casino core, will be poverty in respect to their quality of living.
In your own words, , ‘Singapore has no natural resources, with little land, we can only depend on providing high class services and products’.
Since Heaven has dictated this to be, so be it.
We accept this constrain and we will prove that we are capable of surviving well nevertheless.
Singapore – with its relatively high level of technological development – has more or less arrived at a brand new junction where we are now becoming more capable of developing high-end technological services and products.
If we choose to build on existing infrastructures, we have alternate heavens waiting for us to conquer.
Biomedical engineering and pharmaceutical production, nanotechnology products, materials engineering, weapons R&D and manufacturing.
These are just a couple of examples that the country can easily adopt into consideration for its latest review on economic feasibility studies and nurturing.
In fact, we already have much investments being brought in to the country – courtesy of the IE Singapore efforts.
So will we really all starve to death just because we dun have that casino?
Hmm.. probably not I guess.
Cos since we donÂ’t have that so conveniently reached casino in our backyard, we wonÂ’t probably be so eager or diligent to go all the way up to Genting and try our luck to change that little $100 bill that is left in our hands in hope of getting a bigger $1000 bill back.
Think of the $110 million SGD that you have mentioned in your earlier post this wayÂ…
If we already have $110 million SGD out flowing to the Genting casino, then having a casino in our own backyard might just as easily cost us two or three times that amount in domestic consumer spending when a new competitive source appears to view for the average SingaporeanÂ’s disposable income.
What we will all have on hand by then – will be a cannibalizing effect when disposable income gets diverted away from the ‘traditional’ basket of disposable income purchase, typically to the domestic retailing and F&B industries.
WhatÂ’s going to happen then?
How are we going to effectively solve the new set of problems then?
These are all deeply rooted concerns that we have to keep thoroughly in check at all times. -
no..... will definitely see "loansharks" swimming near casino......
-
Is true that Singapore can go into other areas like Nanotech bio tech etc... however another venue which is casino may help too
Talking about money laudering... to me people can still go to other casino and change their currency easily... I mean... now money laudering is so easy... About your example of a person changing 250,000... they could do that in a malaysia casino too If other part of the world have casino, then stopping singapore from building casinoes to stop money laudering isn't going to help much...
About investing the money using laudered money is a bit... common too. George Soros, a businessman also use its money to play with the economics of poor countries. This phenomenon do not need specially laudered money from casino, this can take place as long as there are rich people.
About your third point and forth point, I guess it is okie
By then gambling is like postitutes... is a vice, addictive and harmful. But human by nature need to have some place to vent it off... That explains the people going to casinoes and cruise ships. The effect of broken home etc are real... however the economic benifits are real too... -
And now, for the 6th C
I AM a goal-driven man. I try to achieve every goal the Government or Singapore society sets.
Over the past years, I worked hard to achieve the five Cs: cash, car, condominium, credit card and country club. Just when I thought I could relax, I have to chase another C: casino membership.
This C is very important. If you cannot go to the casino, your overseas friends see you no up and you become a second-class citizen.
First, you are not smart enough compared to foreign talents, now you are not rich enough compared to foreign tourists. Sigh! I must study and work overtime again.
TAN CHOW BOON
" target="_blank" rel="nofollow">http://straitstimes.asia1.com.sg/forum/story/0,4386,242286,00.html?>" target="_blank" rel="nofollow">taken from ST 260404http://straitstimes.asia1.com.sg/forum/story/0,4386,242286,00.html?> -
Should we have a casino?
YES
I'VE always thought it was high time for Singapore to have a casino. If Singapore seriously wants to promote itself as a fun place, it has to do better than trumpeting bar-top dancing and reverse bungee jumping.
I visited Las Vegas some years ago and, till this day, I remember the dynamism and vibrancy of the place, the ebullient vibes.
Singapore has nothing remotely resembling a decent nightlife and is positively boring, compared to cities such as Hong Kong and Shanghai, and needs to reinvent itself to remain attractive to foreign MNCs.
I don't foresee how organised crime, long a mainstay of an active gambling scene and the bane of most governments, can ever abound, much less take root, given the tightly-policed city state that Singapore is.
Far from being a hive of criminal activity, a well-run and properly regulated casino - Genting is an example - can be marketed as a wholesome, family-oriented experience.
Monte Carlo in Monaco with its pristine and picturesque beaches, resorts and a casino for the rich and pampered, has developed a reputation for attracting high-rollers, the swaggering European elite.
What if Singapore can position itself as the Asian equivalent with Sentosa and the Southern Islands? As competitors go, Singapore has virtually the entire playing field to itself. Thailand and the resort islands of Indonesia, namely Bali and Bintan, are almost exclusively for low-budget backpackers and nature lovers.
Hong Kong and Shanghai have a dazzling entertainment scene but lack the beaches and the idyllic 'island resort' feel. Macau, popular with high-stakes gamblers, is marred by its association with triads and crime.
Aside from reaping the obvious economic gains of building a world-class, luxurious playground for the rich and famous, Singapore would be able to boost its international profile, much like what Dubai has achieved.
Social problems will inevitably arise because gambling can have adverse effects on the family setup, but I question the impact.
SHANE HUANG JINWEI
IT IS good to see the Government exploring the feasibility of a casino. It shows that the Government is willing to open its mind even to subjects that have been considered taboo for the longest time.
Granted there may be social repercussions but a progressive country needs to stop worrying incessantly about too many things, especially when the pros outweigh the cons, and the cons are not all that insurmountable.
One of the biggest worries is addiction to gambling and the ensuing problems. But there are already many outlets to satisfy the urge to gamble, including the casino ships which may be inconvenient but not all that inaccessible.
A minister said that one solution is to restrict entry to those of a certain economic class. But that smacks of elitism and discrimination, not the done thing for a country that wants to be seen as progressive and dynamic, judging from the Uniquely Singapore campaign.
I remember visiting a casino that issued entry cards with date and time of entry marked on them. On each card, there are boxes with denominations from $5 to $100. Each time you change cash for chips, the croupier would stamp the appropriate boxes. This is in essence your credit limit for the night. It also helps you keep track of your losses.
I also remember seeing cards with a helpline you can call if you felt that you needed help. I believe this was a casino in the United States, although I cannot remember which as I had visited a fair number in my reckless youth!
Of course, you could also apply for membership and be given a card for entry without the credit limit.
My point is that it is possible to have measures to minimise any fallout. Encourage the formation of self-help groups, make it mandatory for the casino operator to contribute funds for counselling programmes...
It would be a pity to dismiss this potentially lucrative source of revenue simply out of fear.
ALICIA TAN GEK CHENG (MS)
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
NO
I STRONGLY object to having a casino in Singapore.
The Govern-ment has always rejected calls to have a casino because it knows it can cause great harm to Singaporeans, especially those who are unfortunate enough to have a close family member who is addicted to gambling. Families have broken up and children suffered.
So what if many Singaporeans are already gambling in neighbouring countries or on cruise ships?
While we want to attract rich tourists we must not forget that we are harming our own people just to satisfy the few who will benefit from the opening of a casino.
I feel sad for Singapore if this is what we call 'Remaking Singapore'.
When I was young, I was proud to learn that Singapore became successful despite the fact that we did not have any natural resources.
We faced difficult times and yet we overcame every difficulty to be where we are today, thanks to our early leaders, without whom we would not be able to enjoy a good life.
I fear for the future of Singapore if our leaders think it is all right to set up a casino now because we must keep up with the times. It takes strong leaders to reject pressure from a few.
There are certain businesses we should never get involved in and gambling is definitely one of them. How could one enjoy spending money that had caused families to break up and children to suffer because their parents went to the casino in Sentosa, our resort in the sun?
It is even more ridiculous to suggest that we divide Singaporeans into classes - the 'can go' and the 'cannot go'.
I know of a man who earned $10,000 monthly who would spend all his salary within two days in a casino and return home empty-handed and in a daze. He did this for the last two years.
What happened to his family? The children suffered.
KELVIN LING WAI PING
IN RESPONSE to the proposal to set up a casino in Sentosa to make Singapore a more attractive travel destination, I urge the authorities to tread carefully.
Hong Kong, for instance, has increasingly recognised that gambling is a fiercely addictive activity, and that an addiction to it plagues a considerably large proportion of its population.
Such is the government's concern that numerous campaigns have been implemented to educate the public on the dire consequences of gambling addiction, and particularly how it could, very possibly, adversely affect one's family and loved ones.
The way Hong Kong deals with the problem of gambling addiction is not unlike how we discourage drug abuse. Prime-time television programming is peppered with campaign advertisements which inform viewers of the far-reaching consequences of their gambling habits.
Viewers are also reminded that a counselling service and hotline are available for addicted individuals.
Clearly, such action was taken because it is a serious problem; many an individual's dalliance with gambling has spiralled out of control, with dire conse-quences.
Closer to home, there is much value, and truth, in urban legends and grandmothers' tales of how gamblers lost their home and family.
Singapore's largely Asian population is not unlike Hong Kong's. Culturally, we are very similar. We both share an inherent enthusiasm for food, shopping - and gambling.
Although Hong Kong's gambling problems are not solely casino-linked, the scale ought to be a warning to us.
Are we ready to deal with the numerous social problems which would follow from making gambling even more accessible than it already is, and on a larger scale? Would introducing a casino lead to problems which we have largely avoided, quite successfully, by restricting legalised gambling to its current forms?
JONATHAN WONG SHOOU-HUANG
Taken from ST forum section 260304 -
I am god of gambler... muahahahahahhahaha!
Actually I don't mind a Casino - I like gambling, especially Marjong. But not hardcore.
Wo yao yong zhe si kuai, lai ying ni de du chang. (I want to use this $10 chip to win your casino) - Yanfei
Cheers -
Okay, I will tackle each of your inputs, as I strongly disagree to your obtuse views. First, is money laundering, if you do not know recently Singapore has setup a task force to counter money laundering (effectively checking accounts for frauds) and is working together with world banks on this issue. Secondly, the MAS, has supreme powers to look into any bank account (why do you think our IRAS is very good at catching tax evaders, even ktv ma ma san also can catch). Thirdly, any cash or large transaction or TT wired in will be investigated, amounts more than $1 million (or high transactions on individuals or groups, most suspicious are companies setup in the Bahamas). There are other measures setup as well... if you want to know about M'sia fallout in currency that was due to currency speculation, it goes in far greater detail than just that. We can still keep both issues separate.Originally posted by socrates:Is true that Singapore can go into other areas like Nanotech bio tech etc... however another venue which is casino may help too
Talking about money laudering new word... to me people can still go to other casino and change their currency easily... I mean... now money laudering is so easy... About your example of a person changing 250,000... they could do that in a malaysia casino too If other part of the world have casino, then stopping singapore from building casinoes new word to stop money laudering isn't going to help much...
About investing the money using laudered new wordmoney is a bit... common too. George Soros, a businessman also use its money to play with the economics of poor countries. This phenomenon do not need specially laudered money from casino, this can take place as long as there are rich people.
About your third point and forth point, I guess it is okie
By then gambling is like postitutes new word... is a vice, addictive and harmful. But human by nature need to have some place to vent it off... That explains the people going to casinoes and cruise ships. The effect of broken home etc are real... however the economic benifits new word are real too...
Did you know that Singapore allows prostitution in brothels? I heard sex is more addictive and far more demanding than money. Why do I not hear more broken homes due to prostitutes taking husbands away from their families?
Stealing is a bad habit did you know that? Some people are addicted to it. Same goes for a lot of illegal activities, you can't stop people from doing it, the government can only place measures to ensure that strict rules are followed and are in place.
See beyond, gambling being a vice that is the con, what good can it bring Singapore? From what I can see, the pros sure outweigh the cons!
ps. please do not get offended for the spelling mistakes I pointed out.
-
Originally posted by [ Neo ]:And although we do not see much physical beggars around the streets, what we can expect from families living within an active sphere of influence from the casino core, will be poverty in respect to their quality of living.
You do not want to know what our govt did to rid beggars off the streets in the early 90s.
In your own words, , ‘Singapore has no natural resources, with little land, we can only depend on providing high class services and products’. Singapore – with its relatively high level of technological development – has more or less arrived at a brand new junction where we are now becoming more capable of developing high-end technological services and products.
If we choose to build on existing infrastructures, we have alternate heavens waiting for us to conquer. Biomedical engineering and pharmaceutical production, nanotechnology products, materials engineering, weapons R&D and manufacturing.
You mention all these great trump cards, ppssttt know which ones we failed in?
These are just a couple of examples that the country can easily adopt into consideration for its latest review on economic feasibility studies and nurturing. In fact, we already have much investments being brought in to the country – courtesy of the IE Singapore efforts.
Hey, you know thereÂ’s more capital investment outflow then inflow?
So will we really all starve to death just because we dun have that casino?
Hmm.. probably not I guess.
I love it when youÂ’re cynical, good to joke once in a while. Yes we will not, but imagine the services and jobs it opens up for Singaporeans? If youÂ’re interested to know which sectors of the economy drive SingaporeÂ’s GDP, please visit the MAS website. Which sectors of the economy's GDP has been reducing? Identify, explain why? If you're not sure, I will tell you. I know how most sectors are doing and whether we can remain competitive!
Cos since we donÂ’t have that so conveniently reached casino in our backyard, we wonÂ’t probably be so eager or diligent to go all the way up to Genting and try our luck to change that little $100 bill that is left in our hands in hope of getting a bigger $1000 bill back. Think of the $110 million SGD that you have mentioned in your earlier post this wayÂ…If we already have $110 million SGD out flowing to the Genting casino, then having a casino in our own backyard might just as easily cost us two or three times that amount in domestic consumer spending when a new competitive source appears to view for the average SingaporeanÂ’s disposable income.
Yes, we spend more in the SingaporeÂ’s Casino, but psstt guess who gets the profits back? Our dear government! And who comes to gamble as well?
What we will all have on hand by then – will be a cannibalizing effect when disposable income gets diverted away from the ‘traditional’ basket of disposable income purchase, typically to the domestic retailing and F&B industries.
YouÂ’re forgetting the tourist that the casino draws. The boom in the hotel industry, more business for taxis.... etc
WhatÂ’s going to happen then?
How are we going to effectively solve the new set of problems then?
These are all deeply rooted concerns that we have to keep thoroughly in check at all times.
My answer: How does a city survive in the desert with no resources? EXCEPT FOR HOOVER DAM! Las Vegas but without the drugs and guns - Singapore
SINGAPOREANS ALL CLAIM ITS BORING HERE, NOW GOVT BRING CASINO, PEOPLE SAY BOOO BAD BAD BADÂ… WHAT DOES THAT SAY OF SINGAPOREANS? BORING LAH!!!!