a nobel prize winner is still many classes below a PSLE dropout owning enterprises worth billions. class is always measured in $$$$$ and influential power.Originally posted by JeffQuek:Issit true that Polytechnics Grads are always a class below JC grads ??? Does it mean that JC grads will definitely stand a higher chances of being more successful in futUre ?? Poly GraDs inferior to JC GraDS???
Have Ur Say pls... thank you![]()
A jack of all traits is a master os none... AgreE???Originally posted by Parka:The education minister should just combine the JC and poly together and offer a 2 years course.
There will then be a variety of subjects students can choose from. Students can then choose to study more practical subjects.
A jack of all traits is a master os none... AgreE???Originally posted by Parka:The education minister should just combine the JC and poly together and offer a 2 years course.
There will then be a variety of subjects students can choose from. Students can then choose to study more practical subjects.
Actually, it is smarter to go do Poly because it would be easier for you to excel if you're hardworking and smarter as the majority of the intelligent ones not necessarily the hard workings ones go to JCs.Originally posted by JeffQuek:Also, y haven't the gov thought of relaxing the uni criteria even more ? Poly grads may be less academically gifted..but that doesn't means tt they are less gifted practically right ?.. Many Poly grads yearn to get into local uni But the criteria for poly grads to enter uni isn't flavourable for them at all... top 5 - 10% i think... Issit fair for them not being able to enter uni because they are less academically abled BUT practically gifted ???
Today in Chn i's "i contact", mr Tharman talked ab singapore wanting different types of students... i presumed that he meant having this 2 types of students: 1) academically gifted, 2)practically gifted... So y can't the gov allow more poly grads to make it into uni then ? since they have the intentions to develop "different types" of students ? right ?
Ppl do have ur says
The contents taught in both JCs and Polys are too diversed to be merged.Originally posted by Parka:The education minister should just combine the JC and poly together and offer a 2 years course.
There will then be a variety of subjects students can choose from. Students can then choose to study more practical subjects.
Agree.Originally posted by stupidissmart:Being too specialised have its own problem...
if tat industry sinks or float, u sink or float with it.... Like the internet bubble which burst few years ago... u will be at a disadvantage in finding jobs if your degree or something wrote "Internet management" or something (tat may be no such courses now but wat I meant is when education becomes too specialise)
second if u realise u do not like the job tat comes with your specialization, too bad tat should be your career for the rest of your 30+ working life...
I guess a bit more broad spectrum is not tat bad....![]()
not necessary true.. if say i only have psle or o levels but i working for 5 years in the same industry already so alot of exp, take courses to upgrade(but wif no certs, jus upgrade knowledge n stuff only) would they give me the job as compared to a fresh graduate? that piece of paper, still plays an impt part in sg no matter how u detest it..Originally posted by weidev:basically i feel tat papers do affect but in a limited way...
more important is the initiative to upgrade urself...
if u have the degree... but don upgrade urself... useless...
if u have no degree... but lots of experience... and upgrade urself constantly... i feel u have a better chance to be employed den fresh graduates who have no experience...
dun have such thing.Originally posted by JeffQuek:Issit true that Polytechnics Grads are always a class below JC grads ??? Does it mean that JC grads will definitely stand a higher chances of being more successful in futUre ?? Poly GraDs inferior to JC GraDS???
Have Ur Say pls... thank you![]()