i hate both of them , but at least i'll feel safe about eating in the states , the reports of food poisoning coming from china are frighteningOriginally posted by Blueray:I have met a lot of Taiwanese in China. They don't see China as just a land of monetary opportunities. To them China is just like their home.
You said u dislike China bcos she is arrogant and without a heart. Don't u realise that America's human rights record is one of the worst in the world? At least that's how I think. Why do u think the US is hated by so many in the world? Pls take a look at this websities to see what i am talking about:
http://www.informationclearinghouse.info/article4078.htm
http://www.totse.com/en/politics/central_intelligence_agency/166983.html
How do u find that china can not be a frinend to the rest of the world? going by china history? Do u know history? do u know china history?Originally posted by oldbreadstinks:as for china herself, i find it hard to believe that there are idiots who would believe china would be a friend to the rest of the world, going by her history, had china in her prime ever sought to be a friend of anyone whom she can keep as a vassal?
Go and read Gavin Menzies' 1421.Read up on how the Ming Dynasty sought to pursue a vassal-state policy with every state outside of their borders.Tributes and obeisance were the hallmarks and somewhere embedded within the Chinese psyche today still lies dormant.The Qing empire refused to acknowledge that there were other powers equal to her strength, and the very act of making Lord MacCarthy kneel to the Emperor is a symbol of that insular thinking which precipitated their downfall.One thing about Chinese, we are very proud when we are rich.That is the sad reality of the majority of Chinese around the world, especially in China today.The people there are so infatuated with the gold rush that they will pursue unscrupulous means to get rich.Things have not changed and they might not change still.Originally posted by zjw007:How do u find that china can not be a frinend to the rest of the world? going by china history? Do u know history? do u know china history?
Bad china in her prime??? how bad china is? China want to keep which country as a vassal? I want to hear your explaination!
Finally, If a country with full of naive young generation like you, there will be no future for this country. Feel shame on you!
Originally posted by LazerLordz:You will not know real china and its history by just reading a article written by west. Go to china to take a look and you will know whether u r naive or not. I am sorry to say there are too many frogs in the well like you in singapore!
Go and read Gavin Menzies' [b]1421.Read up on how the Ming Dynasty sought to pursue a vassal-state policy with every state outside of their borders.Tributes and obeisance were the hallmarks and somewhere embedded within the Chinese psyche today still lies dormant.The Qing empire refused to acknowledge that there were other powers equal to her strength, and the very act of making Lord MacCarthy kneel to the Emperor is a symbol of that insular thinking which precipitated their downfall.One thing about Chinese, we are very proud when we are rich.That is the sad reality of the majority of Chinese around the world, especially in China today.The people there are so infatuated with the gold rush that they will pursue unscrupulous means to get rich.Things have not changed and they might not change still.
Calling us naive eh, justify yourself instead of using one-liners which only comfort your weak arguments and your irate mind.If you know the history of China, feel free to tell us.We won't bite ya[/b][/b]
so tell me what can i learn from my china trip if i do visit there?Originally posted by zjw007:You will not know real china and its history by just reading a article written by west. Go to china to take a look and you will know whether u r naive or not. I am sorry to say there are too many frogs in the well like you in singapore!
I think the excuse "private and unofficial" visit is just an excuse, which is being misread by the chinese government and everybody else. But obviously the taiwanese played it big to their advantage by giving a lavish welcome and a splash on their media.Originally posted by the Bear:goodness... his excuse?
private and unofficial visit...
fricken idiot...
this brainiac is going to be our PM...
i fear for our country
I feel sad on your generalized statement of forgs in Singapore. I travelled for the past 10 years to China; Huadong, Huabei, Dongbei, Zhongnan, Xinan, Xibei, not only once but > 20 times per year. Do you similarly want others to quote the dark side stories and justify the "frog" in your own world ? Spare a thought and it is sometimes wiser to exercise the art of listening than flaming.Originally posted by zjw007:You will not know real china and its history by just reading a article written by west. Go to china to take a look and you will know whether u r naive or not. I am sorry to say there are too many frogs in the well like you in singapore!
Cheats exist everywhere in the world. It is just that in rich and poor countries the way of cheating is different. Think about it this way. Even in the world's richest country the USA, there are many coporations with a long history such as Enron, Worldcom etc that will purposely falsify their accounts in order to cheat prospective investors. So much so that many old retirees who invested money inside those companies are forced to come out of retirement to work again. The stituation is quite serious... Like I said before I have lived in china for a few years and those years I have been eating foods from China but nothing has happened to me, i am still alive and talking to u right? Honestly the situation of 'fake foods' is nowhere as serious as the local media potrays.Originally posted by oldbreadstinks:i hate both of them , but at least i'll feel safe about eating in the states , the reports of food poisoning coming from china are frightening
as for china herself, i find it hard to believe that there are idiots who would believe china would be a friend to the rest of the world, going by her history, had china in her prime ever sought to be a friend of anyone whom she can keep as a vassal?
Originally posted by LazerLordz:If u have studied European, Chinese and American history. You will find out that although China has a longer history than any other western country, China did not terrorise other countries as bad as the western countries did, right? The british colonised malaysia and plundered its resources, has the ming dynasty done any of those things?
Go and read Gavin Menzies' [b]1421.Read up on how the Ming Dynasty sought to pursue a vassal-state policy with every state outside of their borders.Tributes and obeisance were the hallmarks and somewhere embedded within the Chinese psyche today still lies dormant.The Qing empire refused to acknowledge that there were other powers equal to her strength, and the very act of making Lord MacCarthy kneel to the Emperor is a symbol of that insular thinking which precipitated their downfall.One thing about Chinese, we are very proud when we are rich.That is the sad reality of the majority of Chinese around the world, especially in China today.The people there are so infatuated with the gold rush that they will pursue unscrupulous means to get rich.Things have not changed and they might not change still.
Calling us naive eh, justify yourself instead of using one-liners which only comfort your weak arguments and your irate mind.If you know the history of China, feel free to tell us.We won't bite ya[/b][/b]
Something can reduce ur bias on china!Originally posted by oldbreadstinks:so tell me what can i learn from my china trip if i do visit there?
Why do you keep harping on the bad record of the US as a basis to support China.Your line of reasoning is getting way out.I'm focusing on the flaws of China and you insist on taking the harm that America has committed to rebut my arguments.Where is the brilliance in that?So what if China has a longer history of civilisation, does it mean that it's people are more civilised in our context today?If you have your views on the American government(let's make this distinction clear) today, which I agree is one hegemonistic entity, by all means,no one is going to condemn you for it.But if you want to persuade me to look at your views on China, you gotta give out examples which can demolish my stand, instead of hiding behind a smokescreen.Shesh, what is the value of a debate today man..Originally posted by Blueray:If u have studied European, Chinese and American history. You will find out that although China has a longer history than any other western country, China did not terrorise other countries as bad as the western countries did, right? The british colonised malaysia and plundered its resources, has the ming dynasty done any of those things?
Look at the last 30 years, which country has invaded more nations? US or China.
Duh... LHL brought defence minister with him. We got to remember that we still have our defence forces training over there too.Originally posted by Aulf:The question is why he go stir up hornets nest ? Why fix sth dats not broken ?
He muz rem that he is representating the country by virtue of his position and who he is ... somemore didn't go alone, go with minister and can somemore say personal/private visit .... KNN !
Such sovereignty issues are very delicate .. dunno whether got consult MFA before he made the decision to go ...
I am just trying to tell u that in the real world, there is no such thing as a civilised world. We live in a world in which every man, country( whether it's US or China) will work in their own interests. Sorry if I am wrong but you seem to give me the impression you are prejudiced against China and always tend to pick on that country.Originally posted by LazerLordz:Why do you keep harping on the bad record of the US as a basis to support China.Your line of reasoning is getting way out.I'm focusing on the flaws of China and you insist on taking the harm that America has committed to rebut my arguments.Where is the brilliance in that?So what if China has a longer history of civilisation, does it mean that it's people are more civilised in our context today?If you have your views on the American government(let's make this distinction clear) today, which I agree is one hegemonistic entity, by all means,no one is going to condemn you for it.But if you want to persuade me to look at your views on China, you gotta give out examples which can demolish my stand, instead of hiding behind a smokescreen.Shesh, what is the value of a debate today man..
I am just trying to tell u that in the real world, there is no such thing as a civilised world. We live in a world in which every man, country( whether it's US or China) will work in their own interests. Sorry if I am wrong but you seem to give me the impression you are prejudiced against China and always tend to pick on that country.Originally posted by LazerLordz:Why do you keep harping on the bad record of the US as a basis to support China.Your line of reasoning is getting way out.I'm focusing on the flaws of China and you insist on taking the harm that America has committed to rebut my arguments.Where is the brilliance in that?So what if China has a longer history of civilisation, does it mean that it's people are more civilised in our context today?If you have your views on the American government(let's make this distinction clear) today, which I agree is one hegemonistic entity, by all means,no one is going to condemn you for it.But if you want to persuade me to look at your views on China, you gotta give out examples which can demolish my stand, instead of hiding behind a smokescreen.Shesh, what is the value of a debate today man..
Explain what do you mean by "our context"? Remember there is no absolute in this world, everything is relative and old conventional wisdom can be made irrelevant by changes across time.Originally posted by LazerLordz:...does it mean that it's people are more civilised in our context today?..
not possible, since i do not think i'm bias towards china, i have chinese friendsOriginally posted by zjw007:Something can reduce ur bias on china!
Read up on how the Ming Dynasty sought to pursue a vassal-state policy with every state outside of their borders.Tributes and obeisance were the hallmarks and somewhere embedded within the Chinese psyche today still lies dormant.If i recall my Chinese history right, the Ming dynasty sent out an armada of ships that was vastly more powerful than any fleets at that point of time in history, they were the most powerful and advanced civilization during that time. But unlike the Westerners and their gunboat diplomacy, the armada did not raze cities and demanded their people to submit to their rule like the old Roman Empire.
Well, you're right.The Ming fleets are exemplary in nature.But why is the government of PRC today acting like an overlord to countries who have "relations" with Taiwan.That is the cruz of the issue here, don't you find their tone used quite condescending?Regardless of how China might have suffered at the hands of the West in the 19th century, that is no way to progress.Right?Originally posted by Stevenson101:If i recall my Chinese history right, the Ming dynasty sent out an armada of ships that was vastly more powerful than any fleets at that point of time in history, they were the most powerful and advanced civilization during that time. But unlike the Westerners and their gunboat diplomacy, the armada did not raze cities and demanded their people to submit to their rule like the old Roman Empire.
In fact, their intention was only to open trade routes and offered advanced science, Confucism as well as better strains of grains that was to be given freely. Yes, they wanted tributes and obesiance from the countries they visited, but they did not sought to rule them only wanting them to concede that China then to be the most powerful country in the world. At that point of time, it's not an unreasonable view to take.
All in all, they were much more benevolent and respectful with their armies than the West did. So the Ming Dynasty is not exactly the best example to use.