To: Reyes,
It is my recommendation that before talking publicly about practising disclosure, accountability and transparency, the basics of what to disclose as well as reliability of sources of information be established.
We do not know whether any corporate disclosures were based on certain facts, data or figures from information flow independently generated by work processes that existed or from secondary sources or based on intuitive or ad hoc management. If the sources of information are unclear or obtained only by interpretations or ad hoc management processes, will such disclosures be useful or objective? I suppose if we fail to maintain such integrity and standards, at the end, our disclosures may lead to justifications or concoctions?
So if the public asks for information about whether charitable organizations are passing down donations received mostly to needy people instead of only or mainly for management or artistes or organizers, there will be many questions to be answered by the charitable organizations themselves.
For example, what are the sources of information ? Are the information from company accounts, balance sheets or work processes? Donations and costs of events are to be verified by work processes started from donation registers and quotations/registers of artistes and fees and each one should be accounted for.
In disbursing payments to needy, a similar work process starting from registers of needy folks and facts of investigations and independence of verifications should generate information that can be used to disclose to public or the press. Better still, processed information can be published.
So I would strongly recommend that disclosure information be obtained only from available information flow from work processes. The best practice will be to plan works to be carried out in component processes that generate information at the same time. Only such sources will offer reliable first-hand information."

[/b][/quote]