go to Iraq..they hav killers for hire out in the openOriginally posted by HENG@:what about state sponsered and state sanctioned terrorism?
Israel also have.Originally posted by sgboy2004:go to Iraq..they hav killers for hire out in the open
prob the Protestant groupiesOriginally posted by John Ching:Domestic & Foregin terrorism, irregardless of whether the act is government sponsor or not.
The IRA were consider terrorist by the British government. Can you guess the other Irish terror group in Ireland that had the support of the British government to fight the IRA?![]()
as long as the target is classified as 'threat', take him down. otherwise, disorient, neutralise or flex-cuff him and secure your sector.Originally posted by Sardaukar:In this 'War on Terror',there are too many shades of grey.How can we tell who to shoot and who not to?
Originally posted by Sardaukar:A MATTER OF OPINION
What's the difference between a terrorist and a freedom fighter
Radicals: One who advocates fundamental or revolutionary changes in current practices, conditions, or institutionsOriginally posted by palmerised:radicals, extremists, terrorists, guerillas, militants. call em whatever you wanna, they're still the same.
For the man who wrote fictions that have terrorism involved, I'm surprised at your quote!!Originally posted by TomClancy:A MATTER OF OPINION
Er! I think Lernado Da Vinci & the likes, can also be considered as radicals considering the fact that they enjoy ass-licking, licking ass & getting poked in the ass****.Originally posted by Johnston:Radicals: One who advocates fundamental or revolutionary changes in current practices, conditions, or institutions
Example: Charles Darwin
Hmm.Originally posted by Sardaukar:What's the difference between a terrorist and a freedom fighter?
For example,how would you see a Palestinian guerilla?
Replace "Palestinian" with "Afghanistan"
And set the timezone back to the Soviet invasion.
.
Hmm! I actually do see your point.Originally posted by Johnston:Oh, and just for info,
The entire US Revolutionary War was fought by:
radicals, extremists, terrorists, guerillas, militants. call em whatever you wanna, they're still the same.
(Direct Quote)
Because:
Radical: They were going against Britain.
Extremist: They were doing un-normal colonial things.
Terrorists: Darned right some "terroristy" actions were done.
Guerilla: The whole war was more or less a guerilla action.
Militant: The US colonist was a Militant to the extreme.
So...
Hmm.
Erm...
The entire UNITED STATES OF AMERICA is a "Terrorist State"?
Oh, come to think of it, SM Lee Kuan Yew was also a radical.
He advocated views that were different.
Yes yes, rifle volleys, cavalry charges.Originally posted by John Ching:Hmm! I actually do see your point.
But I would like to add that there was an "army" formed, with the help of the frenchis, to fight the Brits face to face on the battle fields.
And since you know so much about muskets, I'm sure you know how they fought wars during that time.
I can't remember who came up with the following quote but I guess its true," lifes a Bi*&h".Originally posted by Johnston:Yes yes, rifle volleys, cavalry charges.
But really, im angry at the "catch all statement" made by someone.
Hmm.
Example:
Bill Gates, Sim Wong Hoo.
Should they have stayed quiet there and worked at a job?
Hey i got this radical idea, but it's too dangerous. I think i will be tarred and feathered if i say anything.
I wonder what sound we will be hearing from our PCs now. PC Speaker? Anyone remember that?
History is changed by people who are radical and extreme.
Not by people who are meek and conformist.
The sun revolves around the earth.
Yes it does. You believe that?
The earth is flat too.
It's very flat. You'd fall off past a certain point.
Human behaviour is controlled by humors.
So on, so forth.