Well, there's LOTS of stuff that the SAF operates and is not on the website.Originally posted by rascallyun:Was surfing the MINDEF site, no mention of the 25 version in the list of equipment.
You wouldn't list your family heirlooms for all to see right?Originally posted by rascallyun:Was surfing the MINDEF site, no mention of the 25 version in the list of equipment.
I would feel just the same in a Centurion APC/IFV Nakapadon or M48 equivalent.Originally posted by zenden9:Because Merkava can accomodate 4-5 infantry inside the tank! Would u want to be inside a M113 or Merkava?
Would it really hurt to post a comprehensive list of non-classified SAF equipment with specs and pictures? AND I AM NOT TALKING ABOUT CLASSIFIED INFO HERE.Originally posted by LazerLordz:You wouldn't list your family heirlooms for all to see right?
Okay.I did not mean it that way.My apologies there.I was referring more to people who accidentally let out info on projects currently still classified.There are people around like that.Trust me, I would love it also if we have more publicly accessible MINDEF information being showcased.Originally posted by tvdog:Would it really hurt to post a comprehensive list of non-classified SAF equipment with specs and pictures? AND I AM NOT TALKING ABOUT CLASSIFIED INFO HERE.
For example I can't even find a pic of a Singapore-made Frag grenade anywhere on the MINDEF site.
The MINDEF website guys don't realise that a website with great weapon specs and pics would attract a lot of visitors and act as a recruitment tool. It would also greatly bolster SAF's image at home and abroad.
So let's stop making excuses for the lazy and short-sighted MINDEF website guys or drop clever hints and analogies about "secrecy" leaking etc. Would posting the rpm or range of the Ultimax for example make us lose battles?
like our Killer Hamster Commandos trained by the Singapore Zoological gardens...based in their Children Petting Zoo....Originally posted by LazerLordz:Okay.I did not mean it that way.My apologies there.I was referring more to people who accidentally let out info on projects currently still classified.There are people around like that.Trust me, I would love it also if we have more publicly accessible MINDEF information being showcased.
If you're just doing all the seeing, its always a wow.Originally posted by I_love_my_toilet:Guaranteed plus chop.
BX 25 still in service and play a critical part in an ABG.
I heard the 25mm Live Firing is WOW
PaM~PaM~PaM
Currently phasing out guard duty, implementing the oblisk of light systems to keep trespassers at bay.Originally posted by sidestep1984:like our Killer Hamster Commandos trained by the Singapore Zoological gardens...based in their Children Petting Zoo....
Originally posted by tvdog:Would it really hurt to post a comprehensive list of non-classified SAF equipment with specs and pictures? AND I AM NOT TALKING ABOUT CLASSIFIED INFO HERE.
For example I can't even find a pic of a Singapore-made Frag grenade anywhere on the MINDEF site.
The MINDEF website guys don't realise that a website with great weapon specs and pics would attract a lot of visitors and act as a recruitment tool. It would also greatly bolster SAF's image at home and abroad.
So let's stop making excuses for the lazy and short-sighted MINDEF website guys or drop clever hints and analogies about "secrecy" leaking etc. Would posting the rpm or range of the Ultimax for example make us lose battles?
