Originally posted by gonegoose:
What's the primary purpose of a claymore mine? Its area defense isn't it? And compare the cost of 10 X claymore mines to ONE thermobaric or fuel air bomb, you do the maths, it ain't rocket science. And some might even argue that fuel-air bombs and the such are offensive in nature and not defensive...
Also, if you're charging up/down a hill, how many boulders are there for you to hide behind? much less have the reaction time to duck for cover?
these days you dun need to air drop a thermobaric bomb on the enemy, those days are past. Yes of course the yanks developed the MOAB for afganistan but there are much much smaller versions.
There is schmel tube launch version the blast according to experts resembles 122mm arti blast.
The chinese CCP bought 10,000 of those tubes and right to manufacture under license.
The Sri lankans bought 1000 tubes to tame their tigers.
The malaysians may have it in the form of ammo for their not so long ago purchased metis-m launchers
But then recently the russians developed an even smaller thermobaric version for grenade launched weapons the size is like an M203 round
thermobaric grenade launch "One round away" kao tim sai - exercise cut.

claymore you still have to lay charge, lay the cable a certain distance for safety , worry back blast, worry sweaty palms, worry kanna shot in the ass by hidden snipers ....
hoi exercise cut liao lah!!!! 