ya shell scrape is correct.Originally posted by lwflee:What's a sleeping trench? Is that what they are calling Shell scrapes now?
no mine is 7 days. didn't u read my title? "Diary of a chao recruit's 7 days field camp in tekong.Originally posted by lwflee:Roger! Your Fieldcamp sounds slightly tougher than mine. I suppose this is the 10-day field camp that the new(at the time) CO of BMTC wanted to institute?
Luckily, we did not have trench digging during field camp!
Originally posted by Gordonator:Diary of a Chao RecruitÂ’s 7 days field camp in Tekong
Day 6
280803 Thursday
I woke up super early this morning. It was so cold I was waken up from my sleep, slivering, my teeth chattering. It then started raining (yet again!). Everyone was in a bad mood. Our trench was flooded, our boots were full of mud, the ground felt like quick sand and our uniforms soaked wet. Everyone just stood there like a rock, staring at the muddy ground. Our poncho was not of much help anyway, talk about waterproof.
After the rain, we were instructed to prone inside our trench! Needless to say all of us were reluctant about lying down in mud but we still have to follow orders right? I was covered from head to toes in mud inside the trench, I felt like mud. But I constantly remind myself that today will be our 2nd last day and we will finally be able to return to civilization tomorrow.
The main focus for today is our FOC test. Basically, we will go around the surrounding in section level and will be tested of our understanding of the various FOC drills. Together with 2 other recruits, I was selected to play the role of the enemy. Playing the role of enemy required me to camp in an area and fire blanks at passing sections. It was a relatively easy job because all we have to do is stay stationary behind cover and shoot. The fun part playing the enemy is that we can fire 300++ blanks rounds. The tiring part is that we have to camp there for a long amount of time. We camped there from 11am+ to 7pm+. Yes I cannot believe we camped there for 8 hours! After all that blanks I shot and all those IA drills I performed, I became more confident in shooting my rifle.
After dinner, we have no night training so we headed back to sleep.
To be continued...
i'm not kidding. i really felt like mud.Originally posted by kwlee:![]()
![]()
![]()
Ay... How come you got no re-sup meh? My BMT just slightly before your's only..Originally posted by Gordonator:i'm not kidding. i really felt like mud.
my uniform is covered in mud, my SBO is covered in mud, my field pack is covered in mud. my boots is covered in mud. wet and cold.
screw the poncho btw.![]()
what the fcuk is this?Originally posted by Dreamslacker:Passing SoC and IPPT is also no longer a requirement for BMT..
we have a re-sup on the 5th day. that was the last re-sup. and it started again as always later that day and at night too.Originally posted by Dreamslacker:Ay... How come you got no re-sup meh? My BMT just slightly before your's only..
You gotta be shyttin' me!Originally posted by Dreamslacker:Passing SoC and IPPT is also no longer a requirement for BMT..
Lots of my obese mates moved hell and heaven to pass their IPPT and SOC, and they were better off for it.Lost weight, firmed up and were much healthier.Originally posted by fett:what the fcuk is this?anyone know a reason for this?
only those who pass IPPT can go command school.Originally posted by 12qwaszx:
since there's no need to pass SOC and IPPT, why not juz scrapped PTP???
this is crazy.
that's the thing. no all of them wants to go command schs. so they won't be motivated to pass IPPT. unlike last time where passing IPPT is the main criteria to pass out of BMT. guess we will be seeing more unfit soldiers now.Originally posted by Obersturmfuhrer:Then again, not many people are actually aiming to get into command schools, are there?![]()
A bit more detail for you guys, the USAF pronounced this act as inadvisable, though Pardo was awarded a medal. The damaged F-4 that needed help could actually fly on its own, but it lacked fuel, so Pardo pushed it with the starboard engine at full-thrust, and the other F-4 shut-down the engines to reduce turbulence. The aircraft made it to Thailand, if I am not mistaken, where all 4 crew ejected.Originally posted by CenturionMBT:http://www.boeing.com/defense-space/military/f4/pardopush.htm
Pardo's Push
It was March 10, 1967, in enemy skies over Hanoi. The last of 44 F-4 aircraft were just coming off a bombing raid into North Vietnam when Capt. Bob Pardo and his wingman Capt. Earl Aman were both hit by enemy fire. Aman's aircraft was the worse off. Hit by two damaging blows to the fuel tank, he suddenly was down to 2,000 pounds of fuel instead of the 7,000 pounds he needed to safely return to the refueling tanker.
Pardo knew he had to do something quickly if Aman was going to make it out. First, he tried to use Aman's drag chute to help the wounded Phantom. With the drag chute extended, Pardo tried to maneuver behind Aman's aircraft so he could use the drag chute compartment to push the aircraft toward the tanker. No good. Turbulence was too great.
Pardo decided to try to use the tailhook on Aman's aircraft. He moved in under Aman's aircraft and got the tailhook against the windscreen of his F-4 Phantom. Success. By this time, Aman's aircraft was so low on fuel that Pardo told him to shut down the engines. Pardo's push was working, but the two aircraft had to stay directly in line with one another. Pardo would push for 15 to 20 seconds, lose the necessary balance and slide off to the side. Then he'd have to reposition and push again. By now the pressure of Aman's F-4 aircraft was cracking the windscreen of Pardo's fighter. As the spider web of cracks grew, Pardo became increasingly concerned. He moved the hook down the windscreen into a small metal area below. The hook stayed put, and the push continued. To keep his own damaged Phantom flying, Pardo shut down one engine for the last 10 minutes of the flight.
After pushing Aman's aircraft almost 88 miles, the two damaged Phantoms reached friendly air space. At 6,000 feet, with practically no fuel left, the two pilots and their weapons systems officers parachuted to safety.
"That was one hell of an airplane," retired U.S. Air Force Lt. Col. Bob Pardo recalled later. "For one aircraft to get two airplanes that far out of Vietnam speaks very well of the people who put it together."
thanks dudeOriginally posted by SBS1908B:Here's 2 stories on request of CeturionMBT.
1. Peter Sijan, F-4, in Nov 9 1967 was shot down over N Viet. His pilot was never seen again. Sijan was badly injured in the ejection, with frac shull, leg and arm. He reached the ground and in utter agony, managed to crawl through thick brush for 3 weeks evading Viet Congs at the same time. An A-1E was shot down searching for him. He was eventually caught by the Viet Congs. But amazingly, despite his weak condition, he overpowered the guard and escaped or a few hrs. Unfortunately, he was recaptured, and was brutally tortured for that. Despite the best efforts by fellow POWs, Capt Peter Sijan died of pneumonia 3 months later. He was posthumously awarded for his spirit.
2. Michael Blassie was shot down at An Loc on 1972 May, he was never seen again. His wingman reported that the A-37 was streaming smoke and fuel, and winged over and crashed. There was no response to the wingman calling for him to eject. Years later, The N Viet repatriated 6 bones reportedly from a crash site to USA as a gesture of "good will", along with them came a parachute, a life-raft and amazingly, a name tag saying "Michael Blassie". The USA decided to use the 6 bones to represent the unknown dead in Viet as they had no way of identifying the bones then. The bones were given ceremonial burial,sealed in the mausoleum, along with selected WWI and WWII dead that had been unidentified. In 1990s, DNA identification sparked interest in the bones again, and Clinton opened up the mausoleum and the bones were proven to be that of M Blassie, the bones were reburied in Airlington National Airforce.
Mine was 6 years ago and it was totally different from yours! Not as eventful and enriching as yours. Though i rem the camou lessons n IFCs (Individual Field Crafts) lessons but yours was more informative and relevant. Maybe your OC was really good.. with all the practical hands on after the theory. Sounds more fun too!Originally posted by Gordonator:2 year ago. BMT changed so much now. it cannot be compared with the one many of us went through.