Me 40 SAR 2nd mono-intake '92 and ORD 95.
There are pros and cons in different vocation.
During active time, half of my platoon was downgraded.......

Can it be use as a benchmark to measure the siong-ness????

Frankly, my reservist units consists of Lao Jiao from PDF x-trained to AI to top up our unit strength. 50% of my reservist platoon made up of lao jiao.

After training with them, initially they commented that AI more senang than Infantry as we got the following,
1) Before exercise start and after exercise cut, we got M113 to ferry us.
2) We can store additional ration in M113
3) While vehicle on the move, they quite senang as the driver/comanders are fighting for them.
However, they mentioned the following siong things as an AI
1) We got more stores to take care of and 1206 to sign.
2) We got more weapons to mount/dismount and clean. 40/50, MG/Co-ax(per sectioin)
3) As infantry, once exercise cut, they only need to take care of their own personal weapon and store. As an AI, we need to take care of signal set, optics, heavy weapons (40/50), MGs/Co-ax and stores.
During their first few armour ICT with us, they thought got M113 quite senang, ferry them here and there..........Mounted assualt on objective, dismount to clear enemies.....................
However, during our reservist ATEC, M113s were only used to ferry us to the admin point and laager point only......other than that, us AI were doing coastal hook from Scout camp to Area D, walk by foot to SAFTI live firing area, charge up E-shape knoll.....
After capturing the objectives, then the M113 shows up for defense and laager....

Guess only a true blue Armour trooper kia knows about the "usefulness" of the vechicle......................mrgreen:
