Japan and Germany ?Originally posted by fkh:What are the World Top 5 most powerful nations in terms of military strenghs.
1. USA
2. Russia
3.UK
4.France
5.China.
Is it right?
who sae...wifout the carrier the battle group would be easier bait for the argentine planes wif their assortment of weaponry including the exocet missile which i rmb sank 2 brit warships and dmg 2 others...and furthermore the aircraft carrier was instrumental to the men on the ground in providing CAS and the like until they had a airstrip setup for use in which the aircraft carrier(forget name liao...hahaOriginally posted by SMAPLionHeart:You do not need an aircraft carriers to fight today's war anymore...
Just need to have warships...
Even the 1982 Falklands War , aircraft carrier wasn't really the decisive factor in winning the war, rather its a combination of all the elements.![]()
![]()
you must be a supporter of china. we are talking about the top 5 nations now, not in the future.Originally posted by zquek:I guess the country that is the most powerful and has the strongest potential is China.
The reason is very simple:
1) China has an enormous population and a very capable and large number of technocrats. They have a large number of talented people who excel in R&D. In a prolong conflict, this is definitely an advantage.
2) China is a communist country and has a very strong centralised and command economy. If it wishes it can divert resources to military industries much easier and more efficiently than any democracy.
3) China gives shit about domestic opinion and most of the people are government fearing and obedient peasants who are subjugated to decades of propoganda. They will fight like crazy, the US understood this in the Korean war.
4) China is arming herself at a rate which no country can surpass.
china's military spending is only 1/10 of US. how long do you think it takes for them to catch up?Originally posted by dragg:you must be a supporter of china. we are talking about the top 5 nations now, not in the future.
anything can happen in the future. nobody knows. china might become democratic in 30 years. who knows?
now now..boy this kind of talk will get u stood up against the wall...even though china's military power may seem small...but when they're done wif their upgrading and things...u wan to plae wif fire???Originally posted by idwar:China? Ball-less china?
When the US dropped a bomb on the Chinese embassy in Belgrade, they just could not react..........can only manage to damage a few US websites....hah!..
When the US flew near their air-space, they sent a suicide pilot who manage to kill himself magnificently.........
I think China better stick to making Won Tun Mee......and stop pretending to be a world power.........
sounds like you are describing USSR.Originally posted by zquek:I guess the country that is the most powerful and has the strongest potential is China.
The reason is very simple:
1) China has an enormous population and a very capable and large number of technocrats. They have a large number of talented people who excel in R&D. In a prolong conflict, this is definitely an advantage.
2) China is a communist country and has a very strong centralised and command economy. If it wishes it can divert resources to military industries much easier and more efficiently than any democracy.
3) China gives shit about domestic opinion and most of the people are government fearing and obedient peasants who are subjugated to decades of propoganda. They will fight like crazy, the US understood this in the Korean war.
4) China is arming herself at a rate which no country can surpass.
well..tat's the good side...but u forget about their 100 million army???Originally posted by dragg:china's military spending is only 1/10 of US. how long do you think it takes for them to catch up?
3 million PRC troops lah.Originally posted by Lance_han:well..tat's the good side...but u forget about their 100 million army???
u don need veri good weapons when u can do human wave attacks anywae![]()
![]()
you think this is 1960s? welcome to 2005. land troops are useful only on land.Originally posted by Lance_han:well..tat's the good side...but u forget about their 100 million army???
u don need veri good weapons when u can do human wave attacks anywae![]()
![]()
China indeed needs many years to catch up in its military power. Its armed forces are basically defensive. If we consider china's big land mass then we will appreciate that with 2.5 million soldiers is nothing when spread over the big area.Originally posted by dragg:china's military spending is only 1/10 of US. how long do you think it takes for them to catch up?
China is reluctant to attack Taiwan because the island has the tacit backing of the US. The Americans are still the more powerful opponent when it comes to technology.Originally posted by dragg:if land troops are as good as you think china would have attacked taiwan a long time ago.
Well, put it this way. The salary of a chinese soldier is 100 times lower than a US soldier. In fact a chinese soldier would be more willing to fight, cos he has much lesser to loss than a US soldier.Originally posted by dragg:china's military spending is only 1/10 of US. how long do you think it takes for them to catch up?
it's actually 4.4 million troops and counting....the 100 million man army refers also to the milita and such....Originally posted by SMAPLionHeart:3 million PRC troops lah.
yeah...but then again when they in their own playing field...i dont have to sae more rite???Originally posted by dragg:you think this is 1960s? welcome to 2005. land troops are useful only on land.
if land troops are as good as you think china would have attacked taiwan a long time ago.
Let's raise the stakes a little higher..Originally posted by zenden9:How to identify the 5 most powerful nation? Very simple!
-Which only countries officially declared possess hydrogen bomb or possess the technology to manufacture them?
-Which only countries possess the abilities to make their own SSBN with ICBM cababilities with MIRV warhead?
Only 5 countries can do that!
USA
Russia
France
Britain
China
Only these 5 countries can threaten or annihilate one another in the world.
hydrogen bomb? now already neutron bomb!!Originally posted by zenden9:How to identify the 5 most powerful nation? Very simple!
-Which only countries officially declared possess hydrogen bomb or possess the technology to manufacture them?
-Which only countries possess the abilities to make their own SSBN with ICBM cababilities with MIRV warhead?
Only 5 countries can do that!
USA
Russia
France
Britain
China
Only these 5 countries can threaten or annihilate one another in the world.
and i think you should sign on at SAF!!!Originally posted by SMAPLionHeart:I still believe and i will stick to Israel as one of the world's 5 strongest...
Their willpower, determination and grit to defend their own country truly deserves my praise , not to mention the hundreds of nukes...stored inside their country...
Imagine, if any war happens...M.A.D theory will occur...
Their F-16I is definitely much much more superior in comparison to French, China and even USA's own F-16(s)
"687 enemy airplanes have been shot down in dogfights since Israel`s birth"
---<< in this era...
Can you imagine...the destruction of 3 air forces??
Dude, they can destroy 3 airforces , Egypt , Syrian and Jordanian airforce in 1 day...according to wiki...in the Six-Day War..
Anyway, our RSAF is also trained by them...
don't play play...anyway i don't get it when malaysia forbids any contacts with israel and keep on shortchanging themselves..
I think SAF should go into top 20 at least ...