hmm...that means we can be considered a superpower...proton torpedo...meagton yield, blaster...kiliton yield...speed...faster than light...shield...need nukes to take out with shield on!Originally posted by Lance_han:haha...we have tis in real life we wont even need an army liao![]()
![]()
Got. The Harrier. But I think the F-15 holds the record for climbing fastest to 10 000ft. The F-15 also holds the distinction of shooting Foxbats down, despite that the Foxbat has top-speed of M3+. Both the F-15 and F-16 were among the first aircrafts to be able to climb vertically and still gain speed.Originally posted by LazerLordz:Me.The vertical thrust capability of the Eagle is only surpassed by the Space Shuttle.And I don't think any other plane can do the zoom-climb on afterburner immediately upon taking off.
The F-16 can loiter too.Originally posted by SMAPLionHeart:We need air superiority fighters now..
not , F-16s..
can...but not many aircraft have the endurance of the F-15...even wif add-on fuel tanks...Originally posted by SBS1908B:The F-16 can loiter too.
vote already got lucky draw or not?Originally posted by Orcishwarrior:looks like rafale is undeniably a hot favourite
yeap pi!!!
Possible but still many factors to consider. RMAF's MIG-29Ns are much more advanced than Syria's and there is also the quality of pilots. I don't think Syrian pilots have adequate training sorties on their planes due to budget problems. Also, the tatics employed and weapons/avionics of both types of planes also plays a part. Furthermore, I would be inclined to believe that the Israeli F-16s were not alone, most likely they had an AWACS nearby which directed the attacks.Originally posted by zquek:Hi guys,
Im not sure if you have heard of this news from Israel. In September 2004, two Israeli F-16 shot down two Syrian Mig 29 over the Mediterrenean Sea. It was hushed up until this year. Both Syrian pilots are rescued which prove that Russian ejection seats do work! The first F-16 shot down the Mig with a Aim-9 while the other one used a Python 4.
This seems like a very very possible scenario involving RSAF and RMAF. Hope that the outcome is duplicated as well,
hmm...but then again...u don wan to wait until a war starts to find out it isn't wad u expected it would be...so better plae safe buy eagle....ahhhhhh~Originally posted by Zooish:It all boils down to the 3 Ps:
Price - Rafale cheaper
Politics - America/Boeing has stronger political power
Performance - Depends on what RSAF needs (?)
I prefer Rafale. Though it hasn't been battle-tested like F-15, it is a pretty good fighter on paper. Plus RSAF already has US-made F5s and F16s, time to diversify to new sources.
Dilemma of diversifying with a new untested platform or putting all your combat-proven eggs into one basket /Originally posted by Zooish:It all boils down to the 3 Ps:
Price - Rafale cheaper
Politics - America/Boeing has stronger political power
Performance - Depends on what RSAF needs (?)
I prefer Rafale. Though it hasn't been battle-tested like F-15, it is a pretty good fighter on paper. Plus RSAF already has US-made F5s and F16s, time to diversify to new sources.
F-14 lor.Originally posted by Lance_han:can...but not many aircraft have the endurance of the F-15...even wif add-on fuel tanks...
They have stopped building newer variants for F-14 already..Originally posted by fett:get from the frogs.
if want to get f15, might as well get f14. both 30+ years, and f14 can create more jobs too. RIO, anyone?