I said soldiers, not combatants. And soldiers include dirvers, clerks, storemen etc.Originally posted by Shotgun:Nope, not every male has the aptitude to be good combatants. Thats why some are drivers, clerks, storemen etc.
Wow, you've got it all figured out. "To be a good soldier, one ONLY need to follow orders." So simple one meh?Originally posted by Shotgun:To be a good soldier, one only need to follow orders.
So does being a salesgirl at a department store, or a waitress. Your point? Besides, being a nurse doesn't mean you are able to help perform operations. Even among nurses, there are many different types.Originally posted by Shotgun:BUT to be a good paramedic or nurse, one needs a lot of training and a degree of smartness and alertness to do the right thing at the right time.
The medic in my platoon, probably can't give anyone an IV either. And some riflemen in my reservist platoon have very low IQ. At 30 years old still don't know how to clear an IA and many can't pass their CTSS. The SAW gunners are all bobo kings. Should we abolish NS just because some people are "slower and not as smart as others"?Originally posted by Shotgun:Also, imagine an inapt person being a medic. Wanna IV u also cannot find ur vein. Poke u 2 dozen times liao, ur arm become pin cushion liao still cant find. How?
Some ppl are just a bit slower and not as smart as others...
Since u know there ppl who are alreayd inapt at this kinda stuff, why expand the population by making all females train to be paramedics? U alr kao peh this kinda ppl cannot make it liao and u want SOME MORE? Whats the logic?Originally posted by tvdog:The medic in my platoon, probably can't give anyone an IV either. And some riflemen in my reservist platoon have very low IQ. At 30 years old still don't know how to clear an IA and many can't pass their CTSS. The SAW gunners are all bobo kings. Should we abolish NS just because some people are "slower and not as smart as others"?
If you don't agree, you don't agree. There's often more than one poiint of view.Originally posted by Shotgun:Since u know there ppl who are alreayd inapt at this kinda stuff, why expand the population by making all females train to be paramedics? U alr kao peh this kinda ppl cannot make it liao and u want SOME MORE? Whats the logic?
How about women who serve in volunteer welfare organisations, serving the under privileged? Do they not serve their country? and that's just one group of women.Originally posted by Ito_^:i dunnoe any "woman" wanna serve their country..
Nonsense. So a guy needs just afew months to pass out as a combat medic and a girl needs afew years ? Shut up and sit down if you dont know how to use your brain.Originally posted by Shotgun:Nope, not every male has the aptitude to be good combatants. Thats why some are drivers, clerks, storemen etc.
To be a good soldier, one only need to follow orders.
BUT to be a good paramedic or nurse, one needs a lot of training and a degree of smartness and alertness to do the right thing at the right time.
Also, imagine an inapt person being a medic. Wanna IV u also cannot find ur vein. Poke u 2 dozen times liao, ur arm become pin cushion liao still cant find. How?
Some ppl are just a bit slower and not as smart as others...
Great. You compared your dad to a dog. Well done dog boy ! Clap Clap.Originally posted by Shotgun:Since u know there ppl who are alreayd inapt at this kinda stuff, why expand the population by making all females train to be paramedics? U alr kao peh this kinda ppl cannot make it liao and u want SOME MORE? Whats the logic?
One does not need to have special talents to be a soldier. Tell me, wat kinda special talents does one need to lead a more disciplined and regimented life style? If a dog can also be trained in obedience school, a normal human being cannot learn how to be more disciplined in the army meh?
I've seen enuff examples in the army where ppl can actually stay out of trouble if they just shut up and do their job. Its those ppl that keng here keng there that make all the other ppl dulan.
Btw, the way u reply sounds too damn aggressive. Hence my above reply.
but only fair wad. if u can serve NS at age 18-20, u can also give birth at later age like women.Originally posted by tvdog:What has that got to do with anything?
Oh, you mean the old excuse that giving birth is national service enough already?
They serve NS at 18 - 20. At that age they shouldn't be giving birth.
that is a very good suggestion.Originally posted by ShrodingersCat:How about women who serve in volunteer welfare organisations, serving the under privileged? Do they not serve their country? and that's just one group of women.
Military National Service is just one form of serving the country.
While I do not think that making women perform Military National Service is the best or only way of enforcing empathy, understanding or patriotism, I do feel that women SHOULD have some form of enforced "National Service" in fields such as teaching, nursing, community work, volunteer work, etc.
It will help to make them better mothers, better partners and better citizens.
Great. If you'd just shut up and not post, no one would know u lack substance. Go sit in a corner kid.Originally posted by NavDv04:Great. You compared your dad to a dog. Well done dog boy ! Clap Clap.
Substance to you would be dog food. Good Dog.Originally posted by Shotgun:Great. If you'd just shut up and not post, no one would know u lack substance. Go sit in a corner kid.
I suspect that report sick rates will drop instead.Originally posted by BillyBong:When that happens, male report sick rates will sky-rocket....abortion rates will rise astronomically and the suicide lines will be flooded with calls.
Not that I don't want to serve SAF, but they don't really want me! I've applied quite a number of times for signing on. Never been successfulOriginally posted by jeyelmed:Girls can contribute.
They can be nurses, we have a serious need for nurses. Now a lot of nurses are foreign workers.
They can be child care givers.
They can take on intelligence , driving , logistics positions in the SAF.
Girls always want equality, fine, how about serving SAF?
Indeed.Originally posted by HENG@:that is a very good suggestion.
i think the problem is that, in this sad hell hole we call a nation and a society, people seemto have been brainwashed so severely that they all think military service is the ONLY way of serving a country. And that leads to severe jealousy about anyone who doesn't need to serve. If u have to serve, take it like a man, be gracious and stop whinning about making others who don't serve, serve. If its as good character building for u, then be happy you went thru it, feel sorry for those who didn't, and thats it. No need to keep being bitter about others who don't serve. I mean, if u are bitter about it, doesn't that just show it didn't really build character and that u're just lying about it? That, i believe, is called hypocrisy. Open your minds people. Service to a nation is more than just military service. And stop being bitter about those who don't have to serve. U are all just sounding more and more like programmed robots without the capacity for independent thought
In Israel, women must serve their NS term in military...why can't Spore do that? Jus need to put them in the right place..like ku niang ones to service side and ganghou ones to combat....I c many women are tougher than men...look around u folks....Originally posted by ShrodingersCat:How about women who serve in volunteer welfare organisations, serving the under privileged? Do they not serve their country? and that's just one group of women.
Military National Service is just one form of serving the country.
While I do not think that making women perform Military National Service is the best or only way of enforcing empathy, understanding or patriotism, I do feel that women SHOULD have some form of enforced "National Service" in fields such as teaching, nursing, community work, volunteer work, etc.
It will help to make them better mothers, better partners and better citizens.