Time for Enlistment of women in SAF/NS?
-
At least he's more intelligent than you.Originally posted by Alphapunk2:who are you? ah lee ar? Talk until like politician
-
Thanx.Originally posted by ArdusKane:At least he's more intelligent than you. 
-
If required, it will be done very openly with many months of "hints"
Suddenly, you will see a hoard of FEMALE SAF regulars on promo shows. You also wont expect SAF to have that many female wearing uniform.
Then the MIW will start talking about lack of babies then "we need more
(wo)manpower blah blah blah"
Then a few more months, fathers will get heart attack when their duaghters start receiving enlistment papers.
You will heard the female population scream and our young men cheer. (You wish ah, no co-ed facilities) -
YAY!!! THAT MEANS SHARING THE COMMON BATH WITH THE WOMEN YAY!!
-
Lol like he said u wish ah...no co-ed facilities ahOriginally posted by Alphapunk2:YAY!!! THAT MEANS SHARING THE COMMON BATH WITH THE WOMEN YAY!!
Anyway i'm all for women doing some NS but i do not want them in the military.No offence but training is slack enuf as it is loh -
Haha no lar...if really going to enlist women, they must ammend the SAF Act.
Which will be paliamentary debate already....which I think even PAP MPs may be divided about it. -
Deployed into enemy rear lines via gliders....Originally posted by TrixCereals:Upon deploy, they rush towards their own base.
We definitely need beserkers in SAF.
Capture them as POWs, also no worries about them giving away ops secret.
It also may make our servicemen to kill the enemy all that much harder as they know they may not have a chance to surrender. -
My friend, they dont need to amend the SAF Act. You are looking at the wrong legislature.Originally posted by specialOps:Haha no lar...if really going to enlist women, they must ammend the SAF Act.
Which will be paliamentary debate already....which I think even PAP MPs may be divided about it.
As for the proper Act in discussion, there's NO need for amendment.