RMAF F/A-18D vs RSAF F-16 Block 52
-
well liar...its not tat we cant win u 1v1..its becos ur alone here...Originally posted by [-t-]:ok ok..i understand....1 vs 1 cannot...u need backup from the other singaporeans here....to outnumber me...just kidding
bye
n some of us r not realli into A/C...some r much pro in other machine or weapon.. -
i forgot all abt AC liao ehheee i'm into girls now
-
marathon finished already ar?
i just want to hear it again, can someone say that our hornets are good? it sounds so nice to hear -
dude..nobody in tis thread say tat ur Hornet r good..Originally posted by [-t-]:marathon finished already ar?
i just want to hear it again, can someone say that our hornets are good? it sounds so nice to hear
n they r no gd at all...i dunno much abt A/C..but i have frens in RSAF..thinks it sucks to the core....waste of money to get one also
ask them y is tat so..they give me some deep shit i dun understand...lolz..i believe them..cos they noe much more den we do...
so dude ur Hornets SUCKS...n tats the bottomline
-
hey moderators, this guy is saying bad things...plz give him warning.Originally posted by NathanG5:dude..nobody in tis thread say tat ur Hornet r good..
n they r no gd at all...i dunno much abt A/C..but i have frens in RSAF..thinks it sucks to the core....waste of money to get one also
ask them y is tat so..they give me some deep shit i dun understand...lolz..i believe them..cos they noe much more den we do...
so dude ur Hornets SUCKS...n tats the bottomline
viper52, are our hornets good?
btw, viper52 is RSAF Black Knights -
btw, mods
now u know why i want ur assurance that u will not ne biased....people like NathanG5 are just shooting at me...i only asked someone to say our hornets are good..and he flame me...
if u dont want me to ask u guys to say our hornets are good, u can just tell me...i want ask anymore...why flame me? -
hmmm..... warnings given to pplwho say bad things? then what about the pages before when we saying the bugs downgraded %!@#! thing? Like that might as well give all of us warning?Originally posted by [-t-]:hey moderators, this guy is saying bad things...plz give him warning.
viper52, are our hornets good?
btw, viper52 is RSAF Black Knights
Get a life...... btw.... even if ur hornets are good... we have the insecticide or if u wan the traditional fly swatter... Fulcrums... hmm... fulcrum also known as support in school last time i remember... so we become the force or momentum lor...
lol.......
love crapping..... haha.....
Btw... is this considered "this guy is saying bad things" too ? -
OK..he is saying bad things with bad language and he is flaming meOriginally posted by Moonstriker:hmmm..... warnings given to pplwho say bad things? then what about the pages before when we saying the bugs downgraded %!@#! thing? Like that might as well give all of us warning?
Get a life...... btw.... even if ur hornets are good... we have the insecticide or if u wan the traditional fly swatter... Fulcrums... hmm... fulcrum also known as support in school last time i remember... so we become the force or momentum lor...
lol.......
love crapping..... haha.....
Btw... is this considered "this guy is saying bad things" too ?
is that enough? see..u guys only help ur fellow countrymen.... -
Oh ya.... anyone here remember an old simulator called Strike Commander? Pilot the F16.... fav food = MiG21, MiG29 and also the F18... heehee..... no offence though..... =)
if anyone have this game still... sell it to me!!!!!! I cannot find it now anywhere!~!! -
it is just a game...Originally posted by Moonstriker:Oh ya.... anyone here remember an old simulator called Strike Commander? Pilot the F16.... fav food = MiG21, MiG29 and also the F18... heehee..... no offence though..... =)
if anyone have this game still... sell it to me!!!!!! I cannot find it now anywhere!~!!
even though the F16 is better in AA combat, the hornet is way better in strike missions -
Originally posted by [-t-]:
All for one and One for all brudder...... not really though... The hornets are good for carrier naval missions... besides à don't think anyone in SEA has a carrier except for Thailand...
OK..he is saying bad things with bad language [b]and he is flaming me
is that enough? see..u guys only help ur fellow countrymen....[/b] -
Strike missions? strike wad?Originally posted by [-t-]:it is just a game...
even though the F16 is better in AA combat, the hornet is way better in strike missions -
interdiction..strike..SEAD..DEAD..CAS..BAIOriginally posted by Moonstriker:Strike missions? strike wad? -
Maritime strike... shoot freighters and oil tankers?Originally posted by [-t-]:maritime strike..anti armour..anti-kiasu..SEAD..
Anti armour... hmmm............
Anti Kiasu? ooooo......
SEAD... dunno what's the point too..... Hornets mainly for anti shipping.... -
who said for mainly anti-shipping?Originally posted by Moonstriker:Maritime strike... shoot freighters and oil tankers?
Anti armour... hmmm............
Anti Kiasu? ooooo......
SEAD... dunno what's the point too..... Hornets mainly for anti shipping....
dont B.P.L.O.B. -
wad is BPLOB? Can define?Originally posted by [-t-]:who said for mainly anti-shipping?
dont B.P.L.O.B. -
BPLOB also dunno ar?Originally posted by Moonstriker:wad is BPLOB? Can define?
sigh..
i tell u, u also dun understand..whats the point? -
Originally posted by [-t-]:
dude..u sure im flaming u?
OK..he is saying bad things with bad language [b]and he is flaming me
is that enough? see..u guys only help ur fellow countrymen....[/b]
im toking abt the bugs..n u say im flaming u?
read carefully 1st..lolz -
u very smart ok? *kowtow* I stupid.... i very slow in understanding funny terminalogy..... U the best.. u the smartest here ok?
Everyone..... i declare i the most slow and stupid person here ok? -
U cant realli conclude any thing eg...MiG-29 and Hornets are better than F-16s (vice versa ). It is wiser to conclude which airforce have the better training and better logistic to support her toys......
If u are toking on pure technical classification of the aircraft , then let mi ask u one simple logical question. Do u think singapore , the wealthier and smaller country will allow herself to be armed inferior to her neighbours????? If so , do u think we can survive till now without the ''kaisu'' attitude....?? Wat do u think our defence industry is for???? -
As he said... its like giving a veteran pilot with superior training and experience in an old jet pitting against a fresh pilot with little training in a 3rd gen fighter.....chances are the old jet will win.... of course there are exceptions...Originally posted by foxtrout8:U cant realli conclude any thing eg...MiG-29 and Hornets are better than F-16s (vice versa ). It is wiser to conclude which airforce have the better training and better logistic to support her toys......
If u are toking on pure technical classification of the aircraft , then let mi ask u one simple logical question. Do u think singapore , the wealthier and smaller country will allow herself to be armed inferior to her neighbours????? If so , do u think we can survive till now without the ''kaisu'' attitude....?? Wat do u think our defence industry is for???? -
but that malaysian seems to like technical specs alot....
-
Innocent Malaysian or whatever schizophrenic crap you call yourself now, I'm sorry to disappoint you, but I'm not RSAF Black Knights from the Fighters Forum/aCIG. I have lurked there, in ACIG, in the old and new BATM, but unlike you, I believe empty vessels make the most noise and have sat back watching you make a fool of yourself everywhere.
As for the Hornets being good, I'm sorry, but I must have missed the post, because I did not see anything like that. Were you taking LSD and hallucinating? Sounds like it.
The fact is that while the Hornet is the best aircraft in the RMAF inventory, its more due to the limitations of the other RMAF aircraft rather than its strong points. As a strike aircraft, I would use the word ABSOLUTE CRAP because of its lack of range/endurance. With this in mind, any mitigating factors such as payloads, avionics fit etc would be negated because as a strike aircraft, if you can't get anywhere near your targets to strike it, its pointless.
As for NathanG5 flaming you. Let this be a warning to all including our dear Malaysian friend. All nasty posts and flame baits will be removed. Regardless of nationality of the poster.
One last thing, to the Malaysian budak bodoh, if you dislike us so much and think of us as biased etc etc, why then do you bother coming here? Is is because you cannot speak Melayu well so cannot join BATM actively, and in fact had your credentials and you claims to be a Malaysian kid questioned by Tomel and Saadullah Johan in the old BATM? I saw that thread, and boy, that was a real laugh! -
The first rumours of Singapore and P4s appeared in a official shownews report from Asian Aerospace 1998. The report then stated that it was "believed/rumoured" that Singapore has acquired the P4. It NEVER stated that the news is a fact. Since then, I have seen the rumour become fact, although what information was used to confirm that rumour into fact was never known. What I've meant is that the institute might have taken one of these reports and further propogated the rumour as a fact.Originally posted by cavsg:last week's aviation week also mention about the python 4s. would a respected aviation magazine based its reports on rumours from here?
I've never said the Swedish institute used rumours from here. -
No one said that if no one saw and posted it means it doesn't exist. What I've said, and I think the moderators have made clear repeatedly is to stick to information in the public domain. If you've heard anything from someone in the know/seen anything with your own eyes during your course of work etc thats not public knowledge please keep it to yourself and do not go blabbing about it if its not officially revealed that we have it. The last thing we want if for the forum closed for violating the OSA. Get it?Originally posted by cavsg:did they ever confirm that there are centurions in service too. and if someone saw and never post it here means that it does not exist? anyway i did saw a centurion on s'pore soil and i know of people who have seen and touch a centurion too.
The "use" of the P4 by the RSAF falls into this category