


poor guy....Originally posted by Pressure-Forward:









is tat a bradly?Originally posted by Pressure-Forward:iraqi citizen watch a destroyed coalition force vehicle.
looks like a british M113 to meOriginally posted by CenturionMBT:is tat a bradly?
i dun think the british use m113Originally posted by |-|05|:looks like a british M113 to me
oops...then it looks like wadever the royal marines were using in thereOriginally posted by CenturionMBT:i dun think the british use m113
Aiya, people, its US Marine Amphibious Assault Vehicles (AAV7).Originally posted by |-|05|:oops...then it looks like wadever the royal marines were using in there
The one destroyed did not have the reactive tiles add-on armour that will protect them from RPG. Unfortunately, it was incidentally destroyed by RPG kinda figured since there was no turrent leftOriginally posted by Joe Black:Aiya, people, its US Marine Amphibious Assault Vehicles (AAV7).The one destroyed did not have the reactive tiles add-on armour that will protect them from RPG. Unfortunately, it was incidentally destroyed by RPG
the OICW the grenade launcher not ready yet....only the rifle is readyOriginally posted by Joe Black:If the US and British army is to go into urban warfare, I reckon they should quickly "up-armour" their APCs with the reactive armour just like what the Israeli did to their M113. The M113 are specially modified to take hit from RPGs and some less advanced ATGMs. The coalition APCs and tanks also should mount additional machine guns.
Perhaps US army could also field trial the OICW rifles (with prudence backup of M16/M203s). I also reckon to do FIBUA / urban warfare, the fire team needs more snipers - one should be able to easily call "god" to take out any bad guys hidding behind some concrete walls


ya.....it's a heavy division.......Originally posted by foga:heard somethng that the US is sendnig in another division of soldiers into iraq. amount 20000 troops.
4th infantry division?
