Air Force losses thread

Viper52

4 Apr 03, 13:27

I have deleted the "Air Force losses" thread as I feel that classified information has been posted. Even though the original poster claims that the information is on public domain, I have on the safe side deleted the information for now.

If the original poster would be so kind as to let me know the public domain source which he got the information on to me in a private message, I'll allow the thread.

I hope the other moderators and forum users understand my unilateral decision, and I assure you that its information of a sensitve nature which I would allow restored once I'm happy that its indeed public domain information

foga

4 Apr 03, 13:28

glad you came. tot the infor was too sensitive to be in public domain.

trainner

4 Apr 03, 15:00

im very sure the info is safe.
if it wasnt, i would be able to retrieve the info unless i had security clearance

trainner

4 Apr 03, 15:08

can the thread be undeleted?
this is because i took a lot of time gathering the info.

trainner

4 Apr 03, 18:15

can any other moderator undelete my post?

NathanG5

4 Apr 03, 21:22

u get ur info frm other website or frm frens currently in the force?
i feel the stuff u post is quite sensitive

Viper52

4 Apr 03, 21:28

Trainner,

I've received your private message, thanks for responding to my query about the source of your information.

Unfortunately I cannot undelete the message, so you'll have to post it again. In the future, to prevent such an occurrence from happening again, please quote your source as well as related links where applicable.

trainner

5 Apr 03, 14:33

im going to post a thread about the locations of all our combat aircraft so we can discuss whether or not we should have more in Singapore land and etc.

hope you dont delete it this time

trainner

5 Apr 03, 16:32

moderators,
assuming that i have some sensitive but not classified information i would like to share about the Felta Frigates, can i post it?

CenturionMBT

5 Apr 03, 16:38

Just quote your source and it should be alright.

trainner

5 Apr 03, 17:21

Originally posted by CenturionMBT:
Just quote your source and it should be alright.

can i quote it as: an official speaking on condition of anonymousity?

NathanG5

5 Apr 03, 19:11

Originally posted by trainner:
can i quote it as: an official speaking on condition of anonymousity?

sori dude..r u a NSmen? im sure they gave u a guide line..the topic of tat guideline is Leave Your Secret Behind..
it seem ur very eager to give out info..if it frm ur regular frens or NSF frens..im sure he is not suppose to tok abt it..but if he told u as a fren..pls dun get him in trouble..keep to urself..

kopiosatu

5 Apr 03, 19:14

Originally posted by NathanG5:
sori dude..r u a NSmen? im sure they gave u a guide line..the topic of tat guideline is Leave Your Secret Behind..
it seem ur very eager to give out info..if it frm ur regular frens or NSF frens..im sure he is not suppose to tok abt it..but if he told u as a fren..pls dun get him in trouble..keep to urself..

lol~ official secrets acts.
best way to avoid getting in trouble is to keep quiet abt it, hahaha!
i tink the safest thing to post are articles from Jane's Defence mag, *hint hint* so those who subscribe / have access to it?

|-|05|

5 Apr 03, 20:33

Originally posted by kopiosatu:
lol~ official secrets acts.
best way to avoid getting in trouble is to keep quiet abt it, hahaha!
i tink the safest thing to post are articles from Jane's Defence mag, *hint hint* so those who subscribe / have access to it?

very true.....as for location of our planes unless you have it on official or public domains it is not very useful

Viper52

5 Apr 03, 23:52

Originally posted by trainner:
can i quote it as: an official speaking on condition of anonymousity?

No. Only open acknowledged sources.

trainner

7 Apr 03, 15:02

Originally posted by NathanG5:
sori dude..r u a NSmen? im sure they gave u a guide line..the topic of tat guideline is Leave Your Secret Behind..
it seem ur very eager to give out info..if it frm ur regular frens or NSF frens..im sure he is not suppose to tok abt it..but if he told u as a fren..pls dun get him in trouble..keep to urself..

i was just saying assuming.

and no, i am not in NS

trainner

7 Apr 03, 15:06

i would also like to clear one thing.

just now, someone private messaged me and mistakened me for the innocent hornet character.

i am saying now that i am not that person.

|-|05|

7 Apr 03, 15:09

Originally posted by trainner:
i was just saying assuming.

and no, i am not in NS

when you going in?

trainner

7 Apr 03, 15:14

Originally posted by |-|05|:
when you going in?

i am already 30.

i didnt go for NS

i am a malay born in singapore.
when i was 10, i live in germany until i was 24.

after germany, i applied for PR in malaysia.

that is why i missed NS

nWo

7 Apr 03, 17:04

Hi guys,

Having been lurking around this forum for a long time now, I am also having doubts whether:

InnocentMalaysian = superhornet64 = trainner

|-|05|

7 Apr 03, 18:30

Originally posted by trainner:
i am already 30.

i didnt go for NS

i am a malay born in singapore.
when i was 10, i live in germany until i was 24.

after germany, i applied for PR in malaysia.

that is why i missed NS

uh huh......and so what citizenship do you currently hold?other then the PR

trainner

7 Apr 03, 19:26

i guess im considered singaporean citizen. in germany i was PR also, but now im not a PR in germany

trainner

7 Apr 03, 19:29

Originally posted by nWo:
Hi guys,

Having been lurking around this forum for a long time now, I am also having doubts whether:

InnocentMalaysian = superhornet64 = trainner

one more thing,

what did i do to make you think this?

Typhoon

7 Apr 03, 19:40

Your pro-Malaysia stance.

trainner

7 Apr 03, 21:13

Originally posted by Typhoon:
Your pro-Malaysia stance.

yes, i am pro-malaysia. maybe because i feel half malaysian because of my race.
but i am not anti-singapore.

so far here i have not created any trouble.

i am just sharing facts.