mr... u are not rationale... YOU are not thinking straight, claiming that unauthorised training is akin to realistic training. i would dare say u are not biased against anyone, just not thinking clearly.Originally posted by 35MM Gunner:seems like every 1 here is some how in some way biased against da SAF thus resulting in a 1 sided opinion on wat happened
as such i dun see n e point in tryin 2 reason da rationale behind all tat has happened![]()
its not really that simple... and no matter how much we may debate over here... the problem will remain and will continue to take lives and limbs of our younger gens passing through NS...Originally posted by CenturionMBT:Our society can tolerate a tough military training.Our society can tolerate blood, toil and sweat.But our society will not tolerate death.NS is military training, and i emphasise on the word training. NS is not a system to end the life of young men prematurely.It is not that we are anti NS.But we entrust our life to the country, we expect the country to get us out of those 3 years alive. We can't have maniacs running the camps, we will lose more people both psychologically and physically.
its not really that simple... and no matter how much we may debate over here... the problem will remain and will continue to take lives and limbs of our younger gens passing through NS...Originally posted by CenturionMBT:Our society can tolerate a tough military training.Our society can tolerate blood, toil and sweat.But our society will not tolerate death.NS is military training, and i emphasise on the word training. NS is not a system to end the life of young men prematurely.It is not that we are anti NS.But we entrust our life to the country, we expect the country to get us out of those 3 years alive. We can't have maniacs running the camps, we will lose more people both psychologically and physically.
HEAR HEAR!! BRAVO! I AGREE TOTALLY! at least they shouldn't cover their mistakes with "unauthorized" and all that bullsh!tOriginally posted by the Bear:an instructor trains..
an instructor does not drown their charges...
i believe in tough training... goodness knows i went through it myself... my OC for BMT said that to us...
BUT, he fought with the CO himself over things he saw as "too tough" for recruits...
because he saw his primary unspoken and unwritten duty... to look after and protect his men...
you seem to be unable to see this...
training can be aborted and done again.. lives once lost are gone forever....
lax training can kill too...
thing is this: is there any reason to simulate drowning?
a life has been lost and you trivialise it by ranting about "training"...
the instructors? damn! of course they are to be blamed!! the bastards went against safety considerations of training and caused a trainee to be drowned!
they need to take some personal responsibility in this.. the armed forces, as much as i abhor military forces, become nothing more than armed rabble and gangsters if personal responsibility is abandoned
we are, after all, HUMAN...
HUMAN first before being soldier...
oh, its not that we are bias, its just that we weren't dropped on our head as a baby.Originally posted by 35MM Gunner:seems like every 1 here is some how in some way biased against da SAF thus resulting in a 1 sided opinion on wat happened
as such i dun see n e point in tryin 2 reason da rationale behind all tat has happened which wuz my intent all along![]()
i agree with 100%Originally posted by tripwire:i think i need to clarify... it seems that my last post might be a bit misleading....
1... i dont think admiral teo... is also one of those bastard CO whose only thing in their head is promotion...
2... neither do i think admiral teo approves of non-compliance with standing general orders...
3... i dont think he is negligent... nor the COA or CDF as well...
to be fair... in SAF... there are strict orders against unauthorised training and unlawful orders... and SAF do take a very serious view when such breaches occurs,....
i have seen several list of officers who were reprimanded, striped of their ranks and even put behind DB for ill-treatment of those under their charge... and serves that as a warning to would be other rambos in SAF...
unfortunately, commandos are slightly different from other units... their seeming lack of discipline, over-breaming self confidence and off-worldly pride, is truely, out of this world....
I agree partially with you about the asses thing. But I would like to say that submerging a person' head under the water for 4 times won't kill that person unless it is for a long period of time. Trust me I know it. I don't think that the water treatment part is a punishment. It is more like part of the standard training package which is not stated in the training programme.Originally posted by dumbdumb!:besides.. it was proven that that fella's head was sumerged 4 times.. i dun believe any idiot would force his body into the water to near drowning state.. his body reflexes would hv instinctively tried to protect itself.. more likely some asshole trainer use it as punishment.. condecending asses who loves to push their weight around..
no one is blaming the School Of Commandos..Originally posted by ahkiat83:The school of commando's officer is very professional. They really do have the ability to train a good soldier. Unauthorised training??
This is a combat survival training. it teaches us how to survival without food for day. It teaches how to survival under the hand of the enemy. It is just an accident. Every Man in the CST, go through for the past 79 batch.. Until the last batch 80th , the first accident happened. POWs Treatment is a need for the commandos and other of the elite forces in SAF, The water treatment is just one of the way how the enemy forced you to say out all the essential information that they need. If this course discontinued, then how to you expected the future soldier to face the small experience of what they will be treated if they are in the hand of the enemy. Are they going to expect, food being served to them, shelter available, enough rest or 7 hours of sleeps?
hear hear!Originally posted by dumbdumb!:oh, its not that we are bias, its just that we weren't dropped on our head as a baby.
either that or u play too much CS.. hey.. reality check.. once shot, u can't do no bunny hop and run around like u're alright..
i dun believe in just because the media made the accident look unintentional.. means the SAF should just sweep it under the carpet. a human life was lost. for no reason at all. dying in battle is one thing.. dying for no reason at all.. thats just a waste of human life.. i believe the SAF should take responsibility for whatever that happens in the camp. since they are the ones who are incharge.
besides.. it was proven that that fella's head was sumerged 4 times.. i dun believe any idiot would force his body into the water to near drowning state.. his body reflexes would hv instinctively tried to protect itself.. more likely some asshole trainer use it as punishment.. condecending asses who loves to push their weight around..
yes... agreed...Originally posted by NathanG5:no one is blaming the School Of Commandos..
someone die...so who is at fault now? who is to blame?
there are 100 and 1 way for a enemy soldier to force information out of u..how do u know that the instructor never over do?
how do u know all 80 Courses are done by the same batch of instructor?
the rest might be professional..but i dun think this guy is..
ive got a feeling that your tryin to tell me that that Guardsmen deserve to die?
all in support of the instructors here..u guys still cant get it do u..
its peace time training...u dun kill people in peace time training...
u guys talk as if its just another death..pls mind u.that its somebody son..
u wan realism?? as the Bear have recommend..in War most soldier die of gunshot wound..y not we implement live round n shoot our NSF? see if they can survive..if they die too bad then..just another death to u right..
pls act like a human..with a heart..
a soldier is to protect his country..protect the weak..protect the innocent...
during that time of the incident..who is there to protect that 2nd Sgt?
im glad to see u think that they can just have their own unauthorised training as and when they like. If it is so important, then include it into the training plan!Originally posted by Icemoon:Heng@, you seem to suggest we should divide the CST trainees into regulars and NSFs. Not that we must do it, but doing it will not violate your logic about professional soldiers and at the same time, maintain the realism for a SERE course.
I'm not against the water treatment and do not think that it is unauthorized. If MINDEF studies the training package of other SERE courses in the world, they will undoubtly find it in many countries. What happens was those damn instructors overdo it. 4 times and the hell knows how long each time.
Hey, be nice! We're not all like that!Originally posted by the Bear:put a pile of gungho testosterone poisoned maniacs with single digit IQs, this is just waiting to happen...
It's not our fault that we're smarter, tougher and prettier than you lot!Originally posted by tripwire:unfortunately, commandos are slightly different from other units... their seeming lack of discipline, over-breaming self confidence and off-worldly pride, is truely, out of this world....
I have lost touch with army long time liao, and I dunno abt the things there. One thing for sure, NSF will never have the rank of 2nd SGT. The reports may be wrong in mentioning the NS status of the soldiers, sometimes in articles, they wrote active NSF as NSman.. (NSman title is for those who already ORD).Originally posted by HENG@:yes... agreed...
come on all u who think this is ok. STOP with all the pointless comparisms with other armies, SEALS, royal commandos and such! These guys are professional career soldiers! Thay were given the freedom of choice when they decided to enlist, whereas 2SG Hu is A NSF! DAMNIT! He had no choice, he is but a NSF, he's not even getting paid a quarter of what the commandos are getting paid to risk his life this way! SO WHATS YOUR POINT OF COMPARING US WITH SEALS? their SEALS aren't NSFs, so whats your point? The day when SEALS, Royal Commandos, yada yada have conscripted soldiers serving, then u morons come n talk. UNTIL THEN, stop this bullshit about comparing SAF Commandos and foreign elite forces!