read about that...it will work againest heat but you're good old fashion ww2 ammo will break through it by shear force.As for small shots across a small area it shld still work......after all it's main purpose is to set up a field away from the actual armour and make the round expolde prematurely.And when the heat round does get through the nana metals are suppose to harden infront of the hot gases or something like that....not too sure read that awhile back.Originally posted by Si Geena:This is an interesting development...
The liquid still has to "give" a bit or it will transfer the kinetic energy of the round to the wearer, which means a nasty bruise.
I came across another article that argued for the use of Magnetic Fields to activate the Armour. Supposedly, the Armour has nano-sized metals which only harden and "solidify" as a mass when a Magnetic Field is activated.
Still, i wonder how the armour will perform against contact shots or multiple hits across a small area...
hmm... i was thinking of it being a Personnel Body Armour rather than for AFVs... Most threats we are talking about belong to the Kinetic types, not HEAT ones...Originally posted by |-|05|:read about that...it will work againest heat but you're good old fashion ww2 ammo will break through it by shear force.As for small shots across a small area it shld still work......after all it's main purpose is to set up a field away from the actual armour and make the round expolde prematurely.And when the heat round does get through the nana metals are suppose to harden infront of the hot gases or something like that....not too sure read that awhile back.
Lol most prob we talking about different things....ill try to find the article or something and link it here...Originally posted by Si Geena:hmm... i was thinking of it being a Personnel Body Armour rather than for AFVs... Most threats we are talking about belong to the Kinetic types, not HEAT ones...
The Magnetic Field was supposed to activate the Nano-metals, not act like some Force-field...
Of course, we could be talking about dis-similar things and got it all wrong. Can't find the link to the article... sorry.