Flying Fish
-
>>>Deleted due to public opinions<<<
-
another term is call, Stardex~
-
so that all the COL, BG, MG, LT GEN and GEN can get together for kopi or teaOriginally posted by Arena:Anybody knows what is the objective of Ex Flying Fish or Bersama Lima?
It's a FPDA exercise... SG ships going are:
... ... ...
think it's one of the biggest exercise in the calender year... but wat is they gonna do or i mean their objective?? -
actually..... i have bought up this topic LONG LONG TIME ago.... and... i was kena F and suan when i POINT out the objective of this series of ex....
ok... for what i know... its a combine ex between those county which assume that INDO whack singapore or malaysia.... if u notice.... all the ENEMY was using indo current weapon..... somthing like that..... -
Arena, ur confidentiality note is useless, cos u are the one disseminating all these information. Its wtf man.... Shudden entrust secrets to ppl like u.
-
hey buddy... All these info can be available... Not classified as secret la dey...
-
u think i would post infos(secret) on forum ar??
-
So please be kind enough to post the source please.Originally posted by Arena:hey buddy... All these info can be available... Not classified as secret la dey... -
ex- flying fish or star fish are all ANNUALLY ex lah...... not CONFIDENTIAL at all..... you will get to see them in papers.......
-
buddy, i dun wish to be mean.... but i have wide network of frens in navy... in diff squadrons n diff ships... and they already knows when they r sailing... and for wat ex long ago... and tts why i got to know it... believe it or not...Originally posted by Viper52:So please be kind enough to post the source please.
if i am so great, then maybe i should know all the foreign ships going for the ex liao... -
I'm referring to ur confidentiality NOTE.
This kinda note on a PUBLIC forum... Hello? Can u tell me the logic?
No tom dick or harry is legally binded at all to NOT distribute whatever information u give out here. -
hi Arena
i have frens in all 3 forces also...they too will tell me where they will go n wat ex izit abt..but i prefer to make the conversation private..i just hear wat they have to say n give comment..tats all..
u might get your frens into trouble..some of u might think that shotgun n me are making a big deal out of nothing..there are arrest of servicemen which never surface on the news..
out of sight, out of mind? -
Well then buddy...perhaps you would like to read AND understand the posting guidelines which are posted at the top of the Forum Index page again, specifically the followingOriginally posted by Arena:buddy, i dun wish to be mean.... but i have wide network of frens in navy... in diff squadrons n diff ships... and they already knows when they r sailing... and for wat ex long ago... and tts why i got to know it... believe it or not...
if i am so great, then maybe i should know all the foreign ships going for the ex liao...
What you've been told by your in-service friends DOES NOT count as public domain information. And so what if you have a wide network of information, I'll dare bet most of the regulars here would have a lot of friends in the services as well who have told them things, but that doesn't give them the right to spill their guts all over the place. You can Ar Ka Liao with the CDF who told you about the sun, the moon and the stars, and I still won't give a flipping damn. What you've been told by whoever you talked to is in-confidence, don't go blabbing about all over the Internet.
2) Public domain information should be accompanied by the source of information. At the very least, references should ideally include the name of the publication as well as the date of the publication (Month/Year), or a link the full URL should it come from a website. And no, information from material restricted to MINDEF personnel doesnÂ’t count as public domain information!
3) Separate facts from rumours. If youÂ’ve been told about something your friendÂ’s brother girlfriendsÂ’ brother heard/saw, state it as such. In addition, if what youÂ’ve been told is supposed to be classified, rule (1) applies
Good that you have removed the information. Because I would have done so.