Let start a War Game vs Modern JapanARMY.
-
the scenario is ,
Singapore PM LHL just kick the ass of the Junichiro Koizumi PM of japan.
Japan Parliment is damn fuc.king angry and prepare to decline War with Singapore. Singapore Army force already recall all it oversea Troop,Jet and fighter plane to return Singapore. Within 24hr , all the countries in the world stated they remain NEUTRAL. But the US and England have make a agreement with the Japan, that Japan will not send any attacking NAVY to the WAR, because Japan need the Navy to standby the threat from suddent war with De south-Korea (the untrustful country). but Japan can use the transport-ship to transport their troop only.
Due to LHL and Abdullah(my) close friendship. Malaysia decide to let singapore deploy troop in Malaysia and free use of all things singapore need..(like airport,military building etc) but not WEAPON.All weapon is on their way to SABAH. All people at malaysia are told to make their way to SARAWAK.
China,Vietnam,Laos and Thailand decide to make way for the Japan ARMY. All Thai were told to go Burma.
The UN had pass case NO.2004, by giving the permission the Singapore and Japan to start war any part of THAILAND AND North-MALAYSIA. but the UN and NATO will to stop the War if Japan cannot WIN the War in 3 year.
Can singapore tahan 3 year or might win de war by forcing Japan to retreat within 3 year? -
It's a SELF DEFENCE FORCE(SDF). They wont do such crap without incuring the anger of the whole of Asia. China allowing the Japs to pass through? DO you know how much the chinese hate them?
-
i already say this is a war 'Game' lah..... like "Risk board game "Originally posted by eurofighter:It's a SELF DEFENCE FORCE(SDF). They wont do such crap without incuring the anger of the whole of Asia. China allowing the Japs to pass through? DO you know how much the chinese hate them? -
FYI, JDF is to change its military role soon to include a combat role in-order for Japan to remaind as a member of the U.N security council.
If your game is base on the actual capabilities of both armed forces, then S'pore is likely to win but with heavy lost.
Reason for this is that JDF to date has not really upgrade or spent on arming its forces in-order to remaind as a non-aggressive military force. However, this does not mean that the JDF soldiers can't fight. Instead, I believe that they'll be more aggressive & better organize then SAF. This is due to the fact that being Japanese, JDF soldiers still have a mentality of following orders & they still believe & follow the teaching of the ways of the warrior. It also helps that JDF soldiers are regular soldiers as compared to SAF soldiers.
-
JDF's NAVY and airforce got quota limit, if USA nv put constriction on the contitution like forbiding them to declare war..u think possible??
Japan furthermore going to build a solid aegis system..
If japan is given a chance to build it's military..i think it will be comparable if not much better then China's one..
Given the level of technology , japan can copy F-2 fighters, make mitsubishi
has the world largest bank of 1.6 trillion in assets , and furthermore japanese stuff are re-owned for their quality.
THEY got alot of trillions of USD in reserves..just during war time..
throw 1 trillion into defense..and the millions and millions of car , plane and highly skilled japanese engineers will outshine singapore/china/taiwan anyway...singapore's defense spending total up from 1967 til now..still haven't even break 350 billion USD mark.(which is USA's defence spending for 1 year)
If japan is allowed to modernise and power up their armed forces , it will definitely be stronger then China's one, even though probably lacking in manpower.
Why? Japan in the world's 2nd largest economy even though it was badly hit by the 1997 stuff..
Thier mcdonald is double the average prices, world's costliest cities..
When it comes to car..best in quality and reliability like Toyota..
and they managed to make a HELL lotsa aircraft carriers in WW II ,
and for a feat to remained undetected during pearl harbor assault against the world's strongest and being so daring..
my bet is if Japan is allowed to modernise , the military will definitely be stronger then China's one -
True Japan's technology is good but it has never venture directly into developing military technology for war.
WW II, Japan did have alot of carriers before the start of war. During the war, however, Japan was unable to make, or repair, warships faster then the U.S. Because like S'pore, Japan lacks in resources & even if they have, the current state of the Japanese people would not willingly help the country develope or make war machines.
To compare Japan to China would not be fair. China's military might in ASIA is the strongest, regardless of whether it be technology, manpower, nuclear-power, etc. Japan today is no fight with China.
-
Disagreed... As of now, China still lacks the capability to stand up to a straight fight with Japan. In a decade or maybe even lesser, China WOULD be the strongest in Asia but not right now. Despite the improvements that have been made to China's military, they are still not evenly spread out. Taking the PLAN as an example, the Chinese have invested in puchasing Sovremenny class destroyers from Soviet Union but there are only 4 of them and their remaining fleet assets consist of Luhai and Luhu class destroyers that are still unable to challange the technologically superior Japanese MSDF. That is if we don't even factor in the MSDF light aircraft carriers, which are able to support Harrier style jets.Originally posted by John Ching:True Japan's technology is good but it has never venture directly into developing military technology for war.
WW II, Japan did have alot of carriers before the start of war. During the war, however, Japan was unable to make, or repair, warships faster then the U.S. Because like S'pore, Japan lacks in resources & even if they have, the current state of the Japanese people would not willingly help the country develope or make war machines.
To compare Japan to China would not be fair. China's military might in ASIA is the strongest, regardless of whether it be technology, manpower, nuclear-power, etc. Japan today is no fight with China.
That being said, the JSDF does have its weaknesses like a lack of air-refuelling capability, standoff weapons but they still hold all the advantages in a standoff vs the PLA. Furthermore, their troops are better trained in the rigours of modern warfare, with their constant exercise against the Americans. But whether that will hold true in the future has yet to be seen... -
Just threaten them with the destruction of Shinjuku District, Tokyo. Game over.
-
Wah lao leh....
They come to Malaysia, and we slug it out, who loses?
Malaysia loses
-
Eh! Point from Bot_in_shop noted, however, China's war strat has never really forcus on its Naval power. PDF recently did admit their weakness in reclaiming Taiwan is its lack of naval power.
Rather China has always forcus its strength on its human power. Remenber the PDF did help N.korea to kick the U.S butt in the Korean war, then help the Viet-cong to kick the U.S butt again in the Vietnam war. In any case, ever wonder why the U.S never, ever, contemplate on going to war with China to wipe out communits?
Back to the point, WW II, Japan was never able to subdue China totally even when Jap was far superior, organize & damn bloody brutal.
As for Japan war games with U.S, Ooh please! The U.S generals are learning the China's Sun Tze Ping Fa & others. While China's been having war games with the late USSR.
China has nuke capablity but won't use it. However, China can use EMP at the start of war with Japan. That would totally freeze all of Japan technologies with remaining effort of using KamiKazi warriors again to fight China's PDF. The odds would be 1 JDF : 1mil PDF -
Just like to point out that China does not have a PDF, there's only the People's Liberation Army (PLA).
-
Ah! Obersturmfuhrer, you are so right.
-
Japan send their Gundam we no need to fight liao.....
-
when my war game turn into dusussion between china and japan ?*sobsob
-
Seneario too general to play out fight.
Time is and important factor. Who strike first, time to build up, time to modernise etc....