Originally posted by Scape_Goat_Token:
ok i rmb posting here quite sometime about growin taller . im back again, but ive grown onli lik 2 cm. so im standin 162cm right now, im 16 in sec 4 now.
the average is around 165+? there r exceptional cases lah, but i find myself the 3rd shortest in class already.
i read some posts from gals about some 'pefect bf"...and they wan their bf to be at least 175cm..-.-|| even though i haf no interest in the owners of e blogs i read, i feel kinda stunned. i min lik....agonized n angry also.
i keep thinkin, if they can say things like they're just fine with average looks but height must be above some criteria..., then we guys can say things like, average looks ok but bo*bs must be of certain size, if not will reject
it's almost the same thing we're comparin. i min as in. a guy's height is part of his physical appearance, and it's is a "want" for a gal. while it's the same way round inversely.., i hope i made sense. cox both u carn control it's growth and it's just part of puberty...
so now is not the problem wif no confidence or whatever crap. it's just that how come gals can be so insensitive. at least some say things lik "taller then me den ok already "..., it's more comforting cox i tink 162 can be onpar or taller den mani gals. so i feel more relived...
how wud pple react if we wud only wan a gf with a considerable size of b**bs...., it wud seem lik the guy is pervertic and askin for too much cox these kind of stuff is not controllable. it's the same thing, just overlooked..
how wud a gal feel if she likes a guy but the guy rejects her by sayin " sorry ur those r too small? "..
guys with good looks or bad looks, as long as they r tall. it doesn't matter. but short or below avg guys even wif avg looks may haf problemss...
haix. just kinda ranting...
Just remember that there're all types of people out there... As much as there're insensitive girls, there could also be insensitive guys... Would you accept and consider if a FAT and UGLY girl ask you to look into her heart
