will 167 and 980 be admend to serve sembawang interchange

• alantanchunshyan

  30 Oct 04, 07:45

  do u think there is a high chance of 167 and 980 being admend to serve sembawang new interchange ?if 980 is admend to serve the new interchange,then part of the canberra rd residents will only have 856 and 981.also,if 167 is admend to serve the new interchange ,then canberra link residents will lose a thrunk service.as there are only many people to sembawang park during the weekends,putting a feeder service to sembawang park on weekdays will be a waste of resources .hence ,putting 167 to terminate at sembawang park would be a more ideal choice.what are ur views on these?
• Superbus

  30 Oct 04, 08:19

  I honestly think this thread should just continue from the "Sembawang Interchange to complete end October 2005" thread.
• sbs&tibs

  30 Oct 04, 19:44

  I think trunk-feeder svcs would be operated to complement the withdrawn sector of those services that would terminate at Sembawang Int. Since SBW uses no like 980 and 981, perhaps the feeders may name after them like 982, 983, etc. And maybe renumbering for 167, which I hope not.
• alantanchunshyan

  31 Oct 04, 15:34

  if 167 is really diverted to sembawang interchange,i hope that there would be at least a thrunk service to replace it.