
Not profitable in the sense that they don't earn much as all passengers pay 63 cents each. To get more money, trunk service is a money making service.Originally posted by gohby:Seems like SBS Transit doesnt want to imtroduce feeder service anymore..
True. Bus companies (esp. SBST) now are reluctant to introduce feeder services due to the flat fare.Originally posted by gohby:Seems like SBS Transit doesnt want to imtroduce feeder service anymore..
Originally posted by ^tamago^:What do you think of this service? Will there be any demand?
[b]Serving You Better, New Service 181
Starting Sunday, 9th Jan 2005, 10.30am, New Service 181 will be introduced to ply between Jurong West Neighbourhood 2 and Boon Lay Interchange.
With the new service, residents of Jurong West Neighbourhood 2 will enjoy (a) new link to Gek Poh Ville Neighbourhood Centre and an additional link to Boon Lay Interchange.
Service 181 will on trial for a period of 6 months.
Operational details:
Boon Lay Int via
Jurong West St 64
Jurong West St 75
Jurong West Ave 5
Jurong West Ave 3
From Boon Lay Interchange:
6am - 12 midnight daily
Frequency:
12 - 15 mins
Eh i think SBST did not re-number then as 32x feeder service as it will only lead to further confusion as the feeder routes now terminate at HGN CTRL intl or Sgoon for sv101. Feeder sv325 originated from HGN ctrl Int. The numbers 101 correspond to Sgoon Int for easy indentification with the interchange {100,ex SBST106,107} or HGN [111] although sv115 trial, sv119 are the odd ones outOriginally posted by Nou_Camp:nowadays we see more of those decent service numbers running on short feeder-like services within its own estate,
SBS 11 , 42, 68, 83, 84, 91, 95, 96, 101, 112, 113, 115, 179, 181, 191, 194,
SMRT, 177, 964, 981
Particularly dislike the numbering of the so-called feeder services 101, 112, 113, 115 plying Hougang estate, with feeder Svc 325 the odd one out, very weird, after NEL, bus services in hougang estate are in such a mess
I agree that SBST did not rename them as 32x because these will only lead to further confusion. But personally, I think that this is not because they terminate at HGN or SGN, but because they are no longer feeder services. I will say that 32x numbers are mainly used for feeders. And also, historically, 11x services passed through Hougang estate as can be seen from the ex-111 and the withdrawn 118.Originally posted by Acx1688:Eh i think SBST did not re-number then as 32x feeder service as it will only lead to further confusion as the feeder routes now terminate at HGN CTRL intl or Sgoon for sv101. Feeder sv325 originated from HGN ctrl Int. The numbers 101 correspond to Sgoon Int for easy indentification with the interchange {100,ex SBST106,107} or HGN [111] although sv115 trial, sv119 are the odd ones out
Don't understand what you are saying. Are you saying that feeders must end after 2400hrs and cannot end before that? And btw, both 112 and 113 end after 2400hrs, think ard 2420-2430hrs, if I'm not wrong... must confirm later.Originally posted by sbst275:They might not made it a feeder as if it is a feeder, it cannot end at 2400
Yes, under the current framework... Feeder's last trip must be made after the last MRT except for Bt Merah as it has no MRTOriginally posted by bendy2003:Don't understand what you are saying. Are you saying that feeders must end after 2400hrs and cannot end before that? And btw, both 112 and 113 end after 2400hrs, think ard 2420-2430hrs, if I'm not wrong... must confirm later.
TRue, trueOriginally posted by bendy2003:I agree that SBST did not rename them as 32x because these will only lead to further confusion. But personally, I think that this is not because they terminate at HGN or SGN, but because they are no longer feeder services. I will say that 32x numbers are mainly used for feeders. And also, historically, 11x services passed through Hougang estate as can be seen from the ex-111 and the withdrawn 118.
I realise the situation too. Especially during peak hours. How many buses on Svc 181? 2 or 3?Originally posted by leeJZ:181 demand is pretty good, 3/4 of queue berth on a Saturday afternoon.
Feeders can end at 2400 hrs.Originally posted by sbst275:They might not made it a feeder as if it is a feeder, it cannot end at 2400
For 181, I dont think it would make a difference whether this service is a feeder or not, since it travels such a short distance and it makes a u-turn (i presume) at stage 4.5Originally posted by tranquilice:True. Bus companies (esp. SBST) now are reluctant to introduce feeder services due to the flat fare.
me noticin sv401 after amendment, ridership is tops 10pax per trip... hope it wun be CANNED!Originally posted by ^tamago^:401 also. its status is pretty vague after it got amended after the trial period.