WHAT IS GOING TO HAPPEN TO SBS1688K
-
after 84 is gone which service is SBS1688k going to be on
-
Someone held their wedding on this bus last year....
-
Most likely on Services like :
- 147
- 100
- 80
- 153
- 371 (dont be surprise)
- 83 (Same.. back to PGL)
- 27 (Airport route.. )
*this info is IMO only... -
Sv 371... Going to be withdrawn together with Sv 84Originally posted by sBs_boy:Most likely on Services like :
- 147
- 100
- 80
- 153
- 371 (dont be surprise)
- 83 (Same.. back to PGL)
- 27 (Airport route.. )
*this info is IMO only... -
HOW ABOUT ON SERVICES
161,163
,74,86,87,82,62,136,107,112,113,101,151,51,89,81,54, -
Probably be a SP. Hope it will go back to the original sv- sv36!
-
not possible on 136, 54 and 81.... the 1st 2 are AM/BRAM controlled... the latter under BNOriginally posted by 5454:HOW ABOUT ON SERVICES
161,163 ,74,86,87,82,62,136,107,112,113,101,151,51,89,81,54, -
Transfer to AMDEP to pamper 25.
-
Go to 1 of the Hgdep svcs?
-
If SBS1688k is Transfered to AMDEP or BRADELL DEPOT than i hope it goes to services like 25,166 ,130 ,24,133,135,138,70,72,76,13,162 ,22,21,131,88,8,28,73, 143,155,157,53,54,55,56,139,145,31,26,39,168
-
Let it be 72, please...........
-
What will happen to 621J? Hope to see it again in Hg........
-
SORRY.. It should be 372.. Not 371.. SORRY for the error...Originally posted by sBs_boy:Most likely on Services like :
- 147
- 100
- 80
- 153
- 371 (dont be surprise)
- 83 (Same.. back to PGL)
- 27 (Airport route.. )
*this info is IMO only...
-
I believe it will go to services which are currently using low floor buses...
51, 62, 64, 80, 89, 161
But my bet would still be either 27, 80 or 147. -
161...SBST still want to pamper WRI bus services meh? Maybe on Short distance service lor I think.Originally posted by off_service:I believe it will go to services which are currently using low floor buses...
51, 62, 64, 80, 89, 161
But my bet would still be either 27, 80 or 147. -
i jus took it a day before the LRT ran and i must say the performance of the bus is not good, jus average. expecting it to be on one of the shorter trunk-feeder 11x routes. my guess: 119.
-
How about 101 ??Originally posted by ^tamago^:i jus took it a day before the LRT ran and i must say the performance of the bus is not good, jus average. expecting it to be on one of the shorter trunk-feeder 11x routes. my guess: 119.
-
Why not?! Then I can see it real often!Originally posted by sBs_boy:How about 101 ?? -
why not have SBS1688K ply on every service and the same for special buses like SBS 9888Y,SBS 2888T,SBS9810X,AND THE CNG BUSES
-
Ever heard of depot-control? In other words, it is virtually impossible.Originally posted by 5454:why not have SBS1688K ply on every service and the same for special buses like SBS 9888Y,SBS 2888T,SBS9810X,AND THE CNG BUSES -
ok than how about putting the bus on services that are from that depotOriginally posted by Superbus:Ever heard of depot-control? In other words, it is virtually impossible. -
If you ask us, we can say any service which is controlled by that depot. Since SBS 1688K is controlled by HGDEP, HGDEP can deploy that bus on any service controlled by HGDEP. We can only speculate and for all we know, no one really knows what's gonna happen to 1688K. The decision will be in the hands of HGDEP.Originally posted by 5454:ok than how about putting the bus on services that are from that depot -
you are RightOriginally posted by Superbus:If you ask us, we can say any service which is controlled by that depot. Since SBS 1688K is controlled by HGDEP, HGDEP can deploy that bus on any service controlled by HGDEP. We can only speculate and for all we know, no one really knows what's gonna happen to 1688K. The decision will be in the hands of HGDEP. -
It's a waste to put on 11X buses. These buses are quite unpopular because of it's 'time wasting' route (except 119). Maybe should put on 101 or 325. Especially since these 2 services has so many NAC Mk2 running around.
-
Hmmm, in that case, why not 113 or 112?Originally posted by ah_kwang:It's a waste to put on 11X buses. These buses are quite unpopular because of it's 'time wasting' route (except 119). Maybe should put on 101 or 325. Especially since these 2 services has so many NAC Mk2 running around.