sv16 is not long! If it ends up at Upp East Coast, it will partly duplicate sv14! Do note tt sv16 has an Partial Express sector in the form of Nicall Highway & there are few commuters utilising Nat Stadium bus-stops, so it's a breeze to drive sv16Originally posted by SBS9611D:Service 16 is so long, shouldn't it end at Upp East Coast instead of Svc 13?
Also, if Service 63 can have some ARBP buses, why can't BNDEP take part responsibility for Service 16. Both have a similar arrangement regarding the first trip departing from the midpoint (T2) of the route.
ARBP to Mandrian Gdn is a 20 min drive along AYE and ECPOriginally posted by SBS9611D:What about the Striders?
Also, it means a rush for service captains in the morning when they leave ARBP for Mandarin Gdns. Unlike their friends on Svc 63, who set off for Rumah Tinggi, a stone's throw from ARBP.
If Svc 16 captains don't mind the rush, it's possible to give BRAM full responsibility for Svc 63.
I'm sure ARBP to Mandarin Gdns is further than BRAM to Rumah Tinggi.Originally posted by SBS9611D:What about the Striders?
Also, it means a rush for service captains in the morning when they leave ARBP for Mandarin Gdns. Unlike their friends on Svc 63, who set off for Rumah Tinggi, a stone's throw from ARBP.
If Svc 16 captains don't mind the rush, it's possible to give BRAM full responsibility for Svc 63.
ARBP... but since ARBP is a sub depot under BBDEP... u can say it is under BBDEP.Originally posted by Acx1688:Enlighten me please. Who controls sv16?
BBDEP fully? or joint BBDEP ARBP?
Eh pardon my ignorance, i dun tink tt there's any more space for sv16 at ARBP. Although shorter than from BBDEP, nevertheless, it means re-deploying other buses out.Originally posted by SBST390:ARBP... but since ARBP is a sub depot under BBDEP... u can say it is under BBDEP.
Actually it isnt so bad.... ARBP to MPR Mandrian Gdns is much more direct in a 20 min cruise down AYE and ECP. this is unlike 63 which has a less direct route from BRAM to RMT. hence i think 16 could still be ARBP deployed.
it is indeed deployed by ARBPOriginally posted by Acx1688:Eh pardon my ignorance, i dun tink tt there's any more space for sv16 at ARBP. Although shorter than from BBDEP, nevertheless, it means re-deploying other buses out.
Again, pardon my ignorance, is sv16 full or partial ARBP? Then wat about sister svc sv195 whom sv16 likes to swop buses with? Coz SBS666E,SBS832S,SBS834L,SBS745K have swopped to sv195 in exchange for SBS812A,SBS864A,SBS878K. Especially cameos of SBS877M, SBS1716M,SBS1726J,SBS1727G,SBS1730X,SBS1741P,SBS2646A,SBS2674T which i believe are from BBDEP?Originally posted by SBST390:it is indeed deployed by ARBP
608 provides good competition to 16, maybe one of the factors for its good frequency.Originally posted by iveco:How about this:
Pull out 608 and let 16 cover its deleted sector up to BDK Int.
605 also provided good competition to 162, but it bit the dust. Also provided a more direct link to Bt Purmei from BMR Int.Originally posted by smrt_950:608 provides good competition to 16, maybe one of the factors for its good frequency.
Dei, u kiddin me? pull out CSS608, do u know tt CSS608 is the only svc tt links up East Coast, Marine Parade, NAtional Stadium, Suntec, CBD, Chinatown to Bukit Merah, it's very convenient to East Siders! bsides tt, each svc have their own passengers... shldnt combine...Originally posted by iveco:How about this:
Pull out 608 and let 16 cover its deleted sector up to BDK Int.
From Bukit Purmei walk out short distance, there's sv65, sv855 to Harbour Front... less than 300metresOriginally posted by SBS9611D:605 also provided good competition to 162, but it bit the dust. Also provided a more direct link to Bt Purmei from BMR Int.
By the way, is Bt Purmei accessible for double decks? I think it's nearer to HBF MRT. How about Svc 65 be amended to ply there?
From Bukit Purmei walk out short distance, there's sv65, sv855 to Harbour Front... less than 300metresOriginally posted by SBS9611D:605 also provided good competition to 162, but it bit the dust. Also provided a more direct link to Bt Purmei from BMR Int.
By the way, is Bt Purmei accessible for double decks? I think it's nearer to HBF MRT. How about Svc 65 be amended to ply there?
& being charged exorbitant fares with no improvement in svc?Originally posted by 5454:CSS608 should be converteded to a SMRT service and renumbed as 860
all the regos there are ARBP buses.Originally posted by Acx1688:Again, pardon my ignorance, is sv16 full or partial ARBP? Then wat about sister svc sv195 whom sv16 likes to swop buses with? Coz SBS666E,SBS832S,SBS834L,SBS745K have swopped to sv195 in exchange for SBS812A,SBS864A,SBS878K. Especially cameos of SBS877M, SBS1716M,SBS1726J,SBS1727G,SBS1730X,SBS1741P,SBS2646A,SBS2674T which i believe are from BBDEP?
fullOriginally posted by Acx1688:Thanks But juz wondering for sv16, is it juz partial or full fleet at ARBP?