Basically services 190, 700 and 960 are those which have overloading in only 1 direction during the weekdays peak hours, the loading in the other direction during these times is much lesser.Originally posted by khk:hi, i'm new here...agreed tt CCK was better under SBS...under tibs the freq became more erratic...w 2 to 3 buses coming at the same time...svc 190 was better w the DDs of sbs....now even w svc 700 serving bpj, u cannot get up 190 at whitley rd sometimes during peak hrs... had waited for 3 190s b4 successfully squeezing up one...tt was on a particular monday at ard 6-7pm
yah i noe abt tt...but the prob is quite bad...even w 3 svcs serving the same corridor...rem it wasn't so bad last time...mayb becos of new residential areas in bpj increasing the population there...Originally posted by tranquilice:Basically services 190, 700 and 960 are those which have overloading in only 1 direction during the weekdays peak hours, the loading in the other direction during these times is much lesser.
Obviously is SMRT fault! About 10 years since it took over 190Originally posted by khk:yah i noe abt tt...but the prob is quite bad...even w 3 svcs serving the same corridor...rem it wasn't so bad last time...mayb becos of new residential areas in bpj increasing the population there...
Svc 190 only came under Tibs in 1999, unless you are talking about BPJ services.Originally posted by phillipC:Obviously is SMRT fault! About 10 years since it took over 190
Still not much improvement! what the heck man, still ask got the cheek to ask for fare hike!
yah..6 years aft it left CCKOriginally posted by iveco:Svc 190 only came under Tibs in 1999, unless you are talking about BPJ services.